Estimating Income Distributions Using a Mixture of Gamma Densities

  • Duangkamon Chotikapanich
  • William E. Griffiths
Part of the Economic Studies in Equality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 5)


The estimation of income distributions is important for assessing income inequality and poverty and for making comparisons of inequality and poverty over time, countries and regions, as well as before and after changes in taxation and transfer policies. Distributions have been estimated both parametrically and non-parametrically. Parametric estimation is convenient because it facilitates subsequent inferences about inequality and poverty measures and lends itself to further analysis such as the combining of regional distributions into a national distribution. Non-parametric estimation makes inferences more difficult, but it does not place what are sometimes unreasonable restrictions on the nature of the distribution. By estimating a mixture of gamma distributions, in this paper we attempt to benefit from the advantages of parametric estimation without suffering the disadvantage of inflexibility. Using a sample of Canadian income data, we use Bayesian inference to estimate gamma mixtures with two and three components. We describe how to obtain a predictive density and distribution function for income and illustrate the flexibility of the mixture. Posterior densities for Lorenz curve ordinates and the Gini coefficient are obtained.


Income Distribution Posterior Density Stochastic Dominance Lorenz Curve Poverty Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barret, G. F. and S. G. Donald (2003) Consisitent Tests for Stochastic Dominance, Econometrica, 71(1), 71-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chotikapanich, D. and W. E. Griffiths (2006) Bayesian Assessment of Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance in Income Distributions, in J. Creedy and G. Kalb (eds.) Research on Economic Inequality, vol. 13: Dynamics of Inequality and Poverty, pp. 297-321, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Chotikapanich, D., W. E. Griffiths and D. S. P. Rao (2007) Estimating and Combining National Income Distributions Using Limited Data, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 25, 97-109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowell, F. A. (1999) Estimation of Inequality Indices, in J. Silber (ed.) Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. Hasegawa, H. and H. Kozumi (2003) Estimation of Lorenz Curves: A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 277-291.Google Scholar
  5. Kakwani, N. (1999) Inequality, Welfare and Poverty: Three Interrelated Phenomena, in J. Silber (ed.) Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, Kluwer Aca-demic Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  6. Kleiber, C. and S. Kotz (2003) Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences, Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Silber, J. (1999) Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  8. Wiper, M., D. Rios Insua and F. Ruggeri (2001) Mixtures of Gamma Distributions with Applications, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 440-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duangkamon Chotikapanich
    • 1
  • William E. Griffiths
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Econometrics and Business StatisticsMonash UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations