New Four- and Five-Parameter Models for Income Distributions
Two parametric models for income distributions are introduced. The models fitted to log(income) are the 4-parameter normal-Laplace (NL) and the 5-parameter generalized normal-Laplace (GNL) distributions. The NL model for log(income) is equivalent to the double-Pareto lognormal (dPlN) distribution applied to income itself. Definitions and properties are presented along with methods for maximum likelihood estimation of parameters. Both models along with 4- and 5-parameter beta distributions, are fitted to nine empirical distributions of family income. In all cases the 4-parameter NL distribution fits better than the 5-parameter generalized beta distribution. The 5-parameter GNL distribution provides an even better fit. However fitting of the GNL is numerically slow, since there are no closed-form expressions for its density or cumulative distribution functions. Given that a fairly recent study involving 83 empirical income distributions (including the nine used in this paper) found the 5-parameter beta distribution to be the best fitting, the results would suggest that the NL be seriously considered as a parametric model for income distributions.
KeywordsIncome Distribution Geometric Brownian Motion Generalize Beta Luxembourg Income Study Generalize Beta Distribution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aitchison, J. and J. A. C. Brown (1969) The Lognormal Distribution with Special References to Its Uses in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Ammon, O. (1895) Die Gesellschaftsordnung und ihre Naturlichen Grundlagen, Jena.Google Scholar
- Bandourian, R., J. B. McDonald and R. S. Turley (2002) A Comparison of Parametric Models of Income Distribution across Countries and over Time, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper, No. 305.Google Scholar
- Bartels, C. P. A. and H. van Metelen (1975) Alternative Probability Density Func-tions of Income, Vrije University Amsterdam: Research Memorandum 29.Google Scholar
- Dagum, C. (1977) A New Model for Personal Income Distribution: Specification and Estimation, Economie Appliqu ée, 30, 413-437.Google Scholar
- Dagum, C. (1983) Income Distribution Models, in S. Kotz, N. L. Johnson and C. Read (eds.) Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol. 4, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Dagum, C. (1996) A Systemic Approach to the Generation of Income Distribution Models, Journal of Income Distribution, 6, 105-126.Google Scholar
- Gibrat, R. (1931) Les In égalit és E'conomiques, Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris.Google Scholar
- Johnson, N. L., S. Kotz and N. Balakrishnan (1994) Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Kotz, S., T. J. Kozubowski and K. Podg órski (2001) The Lapace Distribution and Generalizations, Birkhauser, Boston.Google Scholar
- Luxembourg Income Study (2004) www.lis.ceps.lu.
- Pareto, V. (1897) Cours d’Economie Politique, Rouge, Lausanne.Google Scholar
- Reed, W. J. (2004) On Pareto’s Law and the Determinants of Pareto Exponents, Journal of Income Distribution, 13, 7-17.Google Scholar
- Taillie, C. (1981) Lorenz ordering within the Generalized Gamma Family of Income Distributions, in C. Taillie, G. P. Patil and B. Balderssari (eds.) Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work, vol. 6, pp. 181-192, Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
- Thurow, L. C. (1970) Analyzing the American Income Distribution, American Economic Review, 48, 261-269.Google Scholar