Advertisement

Environmental Effects on Cardiac Pacing Systems

  • Louise Cohan
  • Fred M. Kusumoto
  • Nora F. Goldschlager

Early artificial pacemakers delivered asynchronous pulses at a fixed rate regardless of the intrinsic activity of the heart. As pacemaker technology improved, devices were developed that not only delivered pacing stimuli but also sensed intrinsic cardiac electrical activity. However, the circuitry used to detect small amplitude (1–20 mV) intracardiac electrical signals generated by the atrium and ventricle can also detect signals generated from both internal and external sources (1–3). Internal sources of signals include extracardiac muscle depolarization and other implanted devices such as ICDs and spinal cord stimulators. External sources of signals can arise from a variety of sources and are collectively referred to as electromagnetic interference (EMI).

Keywords

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Spinal Cord Stimulator Cellular Phone Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Cardiac Pacemaker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barold SS, Falkoff MD, Ong LS, Heinle RA. Interference in cardiac pacemakers: Exogenous sources. In: El-Sherif N, Samest P, eds. Cardiac pacing and electrophysiology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:608–632.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irnich W. Interference in pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1984;7:1021–1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furman S, Parker B, Krauthammer J, Esher DJ. The influence of electromagnetic environment on the performance of artificial cardiac pacemakers. Ann Thorac Surg 1968;6:90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olson WH. The effects of external interference on implanted cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers. In: Estes M III, Manolis AS, Wang PJ, eds. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Boston: Marcel Dekker, 1994:139–152.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toff WD, Edhag OK, Camm AJ. Cardiac pacing and aviation. Eur Heart J 1992;13(Suppl H):162–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barold SS, Ong LS, Falkoff MD, Henle RA. Inhibition of bipolar demand pacemaker by diaphragmatic myopotentials. Circulation 1977;56:679–683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gialafus J, Maillis A, Kalogeropoulos C, Kalikazaros J, Basiakos L, Avqoustakis D. Inhibition of demand pacemakers by myopotentials. Am Heart J 1985;109:984.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fetter J, Bobeldyk GL, Engman FJ. The clinical incidence and significance of myopotential sensing with unipolar pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1984;7:871–881.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Exner DV, Rothschild JM, Heal S, Gillis AM. Unipolar sensing in contemporary pacemakers: using myopotenial testing to define optimal sensitivity settings. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 1998;2:33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandler MJ, Kutalek SP. Inappropriate discharge by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: recognition of myopotential sensing using telemetered intracardiac electrograms. Pacing Clin Electophysiol 1994;17:665–671.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deshmukh P, Anderson K. Myopotential sensing by a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: two case reports. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:767–772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neuzner J, Dursch M, Sperzel J, Konig S, Pitschner HF. Myopotential sensing: cause of inappropriate arrhythmia detection and device discharges in implantable defibrillator therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:Pt II:1225A.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kusumoto FM, Goldschlager N. Unusual complications of cardiac pacing. In: Barold SS, Mugica J, eds. Recent advances in cardiac pacing: Goals for the 21st century, vol. 4. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing, 1998:237–279.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glikson M, Trusty JM, Grice SK, Hayes DL, Hammill SC, Stanton MS. A stepwise testing protocol for modern cardioverter defibrillator systems to prevent pacemaker-implantable cardioverter defibrillator interactions. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:360–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen AI, Wish MF, Fletcher RD, Miller FC, McCormick D, Shuck J, Shapira N, Delnegro AA. The use and interaction of permanent pacemakers and the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988;11:704–711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Slepian M, Levine JH, Watkins L, Brinker J, Guarnieri T. Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator/pacemaker interaction: loss of pacemaker capture following ICD discharge. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987:1;1194–1197.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monahan K, Casavant D, Rasmussen C, Hallet N. Combined use of a true-bipolar sensing implantable cardioverter defibrillator in a patient having a prior implantable spinal cord stimulator for intractable pain. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;12:2669–2672.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fiek M, Dowarth U, Durchlaub I, Janko S, VonBary C, Steinbeck G, Hoffman E. Application of radiofrequency energy in surgical and interventional procedures: are there interactions with ICDs? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:293–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    El-Gamal HM, Dufresne RG, Saddler K. Electrosurgery, pacemakers and ICDs: a survey of precutions and complications experienced by cutaneous surgeons. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:385–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices. Anesthesiology 2005;103:186–198.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rastogi S, Goel S, Tempe D, Virmani S. Anaesthetic management of patients with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators for noncardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2005;8:21–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Epstein MR, Mayer JE, Duncan BW. Use of an ultrasonic scalpel as an alternative to electrocautery in patients with pacemakers. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1802–1804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Das G, Eaton J. Pacemaker malfunction following transthoracic countershock. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1981;4:487–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Waller C, Callies F, Langenfeld H. Adverse effects of direct current cardioversion on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. Eurospace 2004;165–168.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McPherson C, Manthous C. Permanent pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Am J Respiratory Crit Care Med. 2004; 170:933–940.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aylward P, Blood R, Tonkin A. Complications of defibrillation with permanent pacemaker in situ. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1979;2:462–464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Furman S. External defibrillation and implanted cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1981;4:485–486 (editorial).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aylward P, Blood R, Tonkin A. Complications of defibrillation with permanent pacemaker in situ. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1979;2:462–464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levine PA, Barold SS, Fletcher RD, Talbot T. Adverse acute and chronic effects of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:1413–1422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Altamura G, Bianconi L, Lo Bianco F, Toscaro S, Ammarati F, Pandozi C, Castro A, Cardinale M, Mennuni M, Santini M. Transthoracic DC shock may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:194–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gould L, Patel S, Gomes GI, Chokshi AB. Pacemaker failure following external defibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1981;4:575–577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tobisch RJ, Irnich W. Electromagnetic compatibility of pacemakers and magnetic resonance imaging. In: Aubert AD, Ector H, Stroobandt R, eds. EURO-PACE ‘93; 6th European Symposium on Cardiac Pacing. Ostend, Belgium, June 6–9, 1993. Bologna, Italy. Monduzzi Eitore 1993;215–218.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nair P, Roguin A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and pacemakers. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2005;5(3):197–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loewy J, Loewy A, Kendall E. Reconsideration of pacemakers and MR imaging. Radiographics 2004;24:1257–1268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, Weiss RG, Berger RD, Bluemke DA, Halperin HR. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imagimg of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 Tesla. Circulation 2006;114:1277–1284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roguin A, Zviman M, Meininger GR, Rodrigues ER, Dickfeld TM, Bluemke DA, Lardo A, Berger RD, Calkins H, Halperin HR. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe. Arrhythmia/electrophysiology. Circulation 2004;110:475–482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sommer T, M.D., Vahlhaus C, Lin H, Skowasch D, Naehle CP, Yang A, Schild H, Zeijlemaker V, Strach K, Hackenbroch M, Schmeidel A, Mayer C. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients. Circulation 2006;114:1285–1292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Faris OP, Shein MJ. Government viewpoint; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; pacemakers, ICD’s, and MRI. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:268–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fiek M, Remp T, Reithmann C, Steinbeck G. Complete loss of ICD programmability after magnetic resonance imaging. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:1002–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Holmes DR Jr, Hayes DL, Gray JE, Merideth J. The effects of magnetic resonance imaging on implantable pulse generators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986;9:360–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hayes DL, Holmes DR Jr, Gray JE. Effect of 1, 5 Tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:782–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lauck G, von Smekal A, Wolke S, Seelos KC, Jung W, Manz M, Luderritz B. Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:1549–1555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Iberer F, Justich E, Tscheliessnigg KH, Wasler A. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in pacemaker patients. In: Atlee JL, Gombots H, Tscheliessnigg KH, eds. Perioperative management of pacemaker patients. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992:86–90.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Achenbach S, Moshage W, Diem B, Bieberle T, Schibqilla V, Bachmann K. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. Am Heart J 1997;134:467–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shellock FG, O’Neil M, Ivans V, Kelly D, O’Connor M, Toay L, Crues JV. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators are unaffected by operation of an extremity MR imaging system. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:165–170.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann WA, Gufler H, Weiler G. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace 2005;7:353–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Drach GW, Weber C, Donovan JM. Treatment of pacemaker patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: experience from 2 continents. J Urol 1990;143:895–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jocham D, Brandl H, Chaussy C, Schmiedt E. Treatment of nephrolithiasis with ESWL. In: Gravenstein JS, Peter K, eds. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for renal stone disease: Technical and clinical aspects. Boston: Butterworth, 1986:35–60.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Carlson CA, Gravenstein JS, Gravenstein N. Ventricular tachycardia during ESWL: etiology, treatment, and prevention. In: Gravenstein JS, Peter K, eds. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for renal stone disease: Technical and clinical aspects. Boston: Butterworth, 1986:119–123.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cooper D, Wilkoff B, Masterson M, Castle M, Belco K, Simmons T, Morant V, Streem S, Maloney J. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on cardiac pacemakers and its safety in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988;11:1607–1616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Langberg J, Abber J, Thuroff JW, Griffin JC. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pacemaker function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987;10:1142–1146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chung MK, Streem SB, Ching E, Grooms M, Mowrey KA, Wilkoff B. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:738–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Souliman SK, Christie J. Pacemaker failure induced by radiotherapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:270–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rodriguez F, Filimonov A, Henning A, Coughlin C, Greenberg. Radiation-induced effects in multiprogrammable pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14:2143–2153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Raitt MH, Stelzer KJ, Laramore GE, Bardy GH, Dolack GL, Poole JE, Kudenchuk DJ. Runaway pacemaker during high-energy neutron radiation therapy. Chest 1994;106:955–957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lee RW, Huang SK, Mechling E, Bazqan I. Runaway atrioventricular sequential pacemaker after radiation therapy. Am J Med 1986;81:883–886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Venselaar JLM, Van Kerkoerle HLMJ, Vet AJTM. Radiation damage to pacemakers from radiotherapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987;10:538–542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Venselaar JLM. The effects of ionizing radiation on eight cardiac pacemakers and the influence of electromagnetic interference from two linear accelerators. Radiother Oncol 1985;3:81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lewin AA, Serago CF, Schwade JG, Arbitol AA, Margolis SC. Radiation induced failures of complementary metal oxide semiconductor containing pacemakers: a potentially lethal complication. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physiol 1984;10:1967–1969.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Maxted KJ. The effects of therapeutic x-radiation on a sample of pacemaker generators. Phys Med Biol 1984;29:1143–1146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Quertermous T, Megahy MS, Das Gupta DS, Griem ML. Pacemaker failure resulting from radiation damage. Radiology 1983;148:257–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shehata WM, Daoud GL, Meyer RL. Radiotherapy for patients with cardiac pacemakers: possible risks. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986;9:919.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mellenberg DE Jr. A policy for radiotherapy in patients with implanted pacemakers. Med Dosim 1991;16:221–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Muller-Runkel R, Orswolini G, Kalokhe UP. Monitoring the radiation dose to a multiprogrammable pacemaker during radical radiation therapy: a case report. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;12:1466–1470.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ngu SL, O’Meley P, Johnson N, Collins C. Pacemaker function during irradiation: in vivo and in vitro effect. Australas Radiol 1993;37:105–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chin MC, Rosenqvist M, Lee MA, Griffin JC, Lanberg JJ. The effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on permanent pacemakers: an experimental study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:23–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pfeiffer B, Tebbenjohanns J, Schumacher B, Jung W, Luderitz B. Pacemaker function during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:1037–1044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, el Gamal MIH. Upper rate pacing after radiofrequency catheter ablation in a minute ventilation rate adaptive DDD pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:1437–1440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Burke MC, Kopp DE, Alberts M, Patel A, Lin AC, Kall JG, Arrida M, Mazeika P, Wilber DJ. Effect of radiofrequency current on previously implanted pacemaker and defibrillator ventricular lead systems. J Electrocardiol 2001;34s:143–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lakireddy D, Patel D, Ryschon K, Bhateja R, Bhakru M, Thal S, Chung M, Wilkoff B, Tchou P, Natale A, Verma A, Wazni O, Kilcaslan F, Kondur A, Prasad S, Cummings J, Belden W, Burkhardt D, Saliba W, Schweikert R, Bhargava M. Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:1309–1316.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chen D, Philip M, Philip PA, Monga TN. Cardiac pacemaker inhibition by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:27–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rasmussen MJ, Hayes DL, Vlietstra RE, Thorsteinsson G. Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be safely used in patients with permanent pacemakers? Mayo Clin Proc 1988;63:443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Eichers P. Hyperbaric chamber and pressure vessel tests. Medtronic Design Assurance Rep 1992;PE92–292.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Duru F, Lauber P, Klaus G, Candinas R. Hospital pager systems may cause interference with pacemaker telemetry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:2353–2359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lau W, Corcoran SJ, Mond HG. Pacemaker tachycardia in a minute ventilation rate-adaptive pacemaker induced by electrocardiographic monitoring. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29: 438–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Agarval A, Hewson J, Redding V. Ultrasound dental scalers and demand pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988;11(6):853.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Miller CS, Leonelli FM, Latham E. Selective interference with pacemaker activity by electrical dental devices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1998;85:33–36.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, Militello C, Atamura G, Ammirati F, Santini M. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:1218–1224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW, Estes M 3rd, Griffith JL, Stephens RA, Carlo GL, Finday GK, Johnson CM. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular phones. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1473–1479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Irich W, Batz L, Muller R, Tobisch R. Electromagnetic interferences of pacemaker by mobile phones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1431–1446.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chen WH, Lau CP, Leung SK, Ho DS, Lee IS. Interference of cellular phones with implanted permanent pacemakers. Clin Cardiol 1996;19:881–886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Altamura G, Toscano S, Gentilucci G, et al. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1632–1641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yousef J, Lars AN. Validation of a real-time wireless telemedicine system using a Bluetooth protocol and a mobile phone, for remote monitoring patient in clinical practice. Eur J Med Res 2005;10:254–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Bassen HI, Moore HJ, Ruggera PS. Cellular phone interference testing of implantable cardiac defibrillators in vitro. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1709–1715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Bellocci F, Caruso F, Donato A, Gabrielli D, Militello C, Montenaro AS, Zecchi P. Electromagnetic interference of digital and analog cellular telephones with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro and in vivo studies. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:626–634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Trigano A, Blandeau O, Dale C, Wong MF, Wiary J. Reliability of electromagnetic filters of cardiac pacemakers tested by cellular phone ringing. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:837–841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dodinot B, Godenir JP, Costa AB. Electronic article surveillance: a possible danger for pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993;16:46–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lucas E, Johnson D, McElroy BP. The effects of electronic article surveillance systems on permanent pacemakers: an in vitro study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17(Pt II):2021–2026.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Pacemaker patients in department stores: anti-theft security systems are dangerous. Med Tribune 1991;40:28–29.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    McIvor ME, Reddinger J, Floden E, Sheppard RC. Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices (SPICED TEAS). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1847–1861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Harthorne JW. Theft deterrent systems: a threat for medical device recipients or an industry cat fight? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1845 (editorial).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Santucci PA, Haw J, Trohman RG, Pinski SC. Interference with an implantable defibrillator by an electronic antitheft surveillance device. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1371–1374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cooperman Y, Zarafti D, Laniado S. The effect of metal detector gates on implanted permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988;11:1386–1387.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kolb C, Schmieder S, Lehmann G, Zrenner B, Karch MR, Plewan A, Schmitt C. Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers and cardiac defibrillators? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:2054–2059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Marco D, Eisinger G, Hayes DL. Testing work environments for electromagnetic interference. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992;15:2016–2022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Fetter JG, Benditt DG, Stanton MS. Electromagnetic interference from welding and motors on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators as tested in the electrically hostile work site. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:423–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Toff WD, Edhag OK, Camm AJ. Cardiac pacing and aviation. Eur Heart J 1992;13(Suppl H):162–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Tri JL, Trusty JN, Hayes DL. Potential for personal digital assistant interference with implantable cardiac devices. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:1527–1530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Chan NY, Ho LWL. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock due to external alternating current leak; Report of two cases. Europace 2005;7:193–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Al Khadra AS, Al Jutaily A, Al Shuhri S. Detection of refrigerator associated 60 Hz alternating current as ventricular fibrillation by an implantable defibrillator. Europace 2006;8:175–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kolb C, Schmieder S, Schmitt C. Inappropriate shock delivery due to interference between a washing machine and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2002;7:255–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Vlay SC. Fish pond electromagnetic interference resulting in an inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hirose M, Hida M, Sato E, Kokubo K, Nie M, Kobayashi H. Electromagnetic interference of implantable unipolar cardiac pacemakers by an induction oven. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:540–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Binggelli C, Rickli H, Ammann P, Bingelli C, Brunkhorst C, Hufschmid V, Luechinger R, Duru F. Induction ovens and electromagnetic interference: What is the risk for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillatos? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:399–401.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Kolb C, Deisenhofer I, Weyerbrock S, Schmeider S, Plewan A, Zrenner B, Schmitt C. Incidence of antitachycardia therapy suspension due to magnet reversion in implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:221–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Bonnet CA, Elson JJ, Fogoros RN. Accidental deactivation of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Am Heart J 1990;120:696–697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ferrick KJ, Johnston D, Kim SG, Roth J, Brodman R, Zimmerman J, Fisher JD. Inadvertant AICD inactivation while playing bingo. Am Heart J 1991;121:206–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Wolber T, Ryf S, Binggeli C, Holzmeister J, Brunkhorst C, Luechinger R, Duru F. Potential interference of small neodymium magnets with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Toivonen L, Valjus J, Hongisto M, Metso R. The influence of elevated 50 Hz electric and magnetic field on implanted cardiac pacemakers: the role of the lead configurations and programming of the sensitivity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14(12):2114–2122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Roy OZ, Podgorshi AS. Tests on a shocking device: the stun gun. Med Biol Eng Comput 1989;27:445–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Haegeli LM, Sterns LD, Adam DC, Leather RA. Effect of a Taser shot to the chest of a patient with an implantable defibrillator. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:339–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Madrid A, Sanchez A, Bosch E, Fernandez E, Morro Serrano C. Dysfunction of implantable defibrillators caused by slot machines. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:212–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Patel MB, Thaker JP, Punnam S, Jongnarangsin K. Pacemaker interference with an i Pod. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:781–784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Trignano A, Lafav V, Blandeau O, Levy S, Gardette B, Micoli C. Activity-based rate-adaptive pacemakers under hyperbaric conditions. J Interven Card Electrophysiol 2006;15:179–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Cohan
    • 1
  • Fred M. Kusumoto
    • 1
  • Nora F. Goldschlager
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MedicineMayo ClinicJacksonvilleUSA
  2. 2.ECG Laboratory and Coronary Care UnitUniversity of California San Francisco School of MedicineSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations