Skip to main content

Acquired Atrioventricular Block

  • Chapter
  • 1619 Accesses

There are many causes of atrioventricular (AV) block but progressive idiopathic fibrosis of the conduction system related to an aging process of the cardiac skeleton is the most common cause of chronic acquired AV block. Barring congenital AV block, Lyme disease is the most common cause of reversible third-degree AV block in young individuals and it is usually AV nodal. Before implantation of a permanent pacemaker, reversible causes of AV block such as Lyme disease, hypervagotonia, athletic heart, sleep apnea, ischemia, and drug, metabolic, or electrolytic imbalance must be excluded. Table 10.1 outlines the format used in the 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (ACC/AHA/NASPE) guidelines for pacemaker implantation (1). The indications for permanent pacing in second- or third- degree AV block unlikely to regress are often straightforward in symptomatic patients but they are more difficult in asymptomatic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Winters SL, Gibbons RI, Antman EM, Alpert JS, Hiratzka LF, Faxon DP, Jacobs AK, Fuster V, Smith SC Jr. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology Committee. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:1183–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO. Clinical evidence of hemiblock: syndrome of RBBB and intermittent LAH and LPH. Trifascicular block. In: Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO, (Eds.). The Hemiblocks. Oldsmar, FL, Tampa Tracings 1970;55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barold SS, Hayes DL. Second-degree atrioventricular block: a reappraisal. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:44–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Sherif N, Aranda J, Befeler B, Lazzara R. Atypical Wenckebach periodicity simulating Mobitz type II AV block. Brit Heart J 1978;40:1376–1383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman HS, Gomes JAC, Haft JI. An analysis of Wenckebach periodicity. J Electrocardiol 1975;8:307–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Denes P, Levy L, Pick A, Rosen KM. The incidence of typical and atypical AV Wenckebach periodicity. Am Heart J 1975;89:26–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Connelly DT, Steinhaus DM. Mobitz type I atrioventricular block: an indication for permanent pacing? PACE 1996;19:261–264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaw DB, Kekwick CA, Veale D, Gowers J, Whistance T. Survival in second-degree atrioventricular block. Br Heart J 1985;53:587–593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw DB, Gowers JI, Kekwick CA, New KH, Whistance AW. Is Mobitz type I atrioventricular block benign in adults? Heart 2004;90:169–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barold SS. Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1018–1020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barold SS, Friedberg HD. Second degree atrioventricular block. A matter of definition. Am J Cardiol 1974;33:311–315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange HW, Ameisen O, Mack R, Moses SW, Kligfield P. Prevalence and clinical correlates of non-Wenckebach narrow QRS complex second degree atrioventricular block detected by ambulatory ECG. Am Heart J 1988;115:114–120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO/ISC Task Force. Definition of terms related to cardiac rhythm. Am Heart J 1978;95:796–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Surawicz B, Uhley H, Borun R, Laks M, Crevasse L, Rosen K, Nelson W, Mandel W, Lawrence P, Jackson L, Flowers N, Clifton J, Greenfield J Jr, De Medina EO. The quest for optimal electrocardiography. Task Force I: standardization of terminology and interpretation. Bethesda Conference co-sponsored by the American College of Cardiology and Health Resources Administration of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Task Force 1. Standardization of terminology and interpretation. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:130–144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barold SS. 2:1 atrioventricular block: order from chaos. Am J Emerg Med 2001;19:214–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Möbitz W. Uber die unvollstandige storung der erregungsuberleitung zwischen vorhof und kammer des menschlichen herzems. Z Ges Exp Med 1924;41:180–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shohat-Zabarski R, Iakobishvili Z, Kusniec J, Mazur A, Strasberg B. Paroxysmal atrioventricular block: clinical experience with 20 patients. Int J Cardiol 2004;97:399–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barold SS. Indications for permanent cardiac pacing in first-degree AV block: class I, II, or III? PACE 1996;19:747–751.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iliev II, Yamachika S, Muta K, Hayano M, Ishimatsu T, Nakao K, Komiya N, Hirata T, Ueyama C, Yano K. Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate. PACE 2000;23:74–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luscure M, Dechandol AM, Lagorge P, Marot M, Goutner C, Donzeau P. Blocs auriculo-ventriculaires d’effort. Ann Cardiol Angeiol 1995;44:486–492.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sumiyoshi M, Nakata Y, Yasuda M, Tokano T, Ogura S, Nakazato Y, Yamaguchi H. Clinical and electrophysiologic features of exercise-induced atrioventricular block. Am Heart J 1996;2:1277–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barold SS, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Haïssaguerre M, Clémenty J. Exercise-induced second-degree AV block: is it type I or type II? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8:1084–1086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deaner A, Fluck D, Timmis AD. Exertional atrioventricular block presenting with recurrent syncope: successful treatment by coronary angioplasty. Heart 1996;75:640–641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrac D, Radic B, Birtic K, Gjurovic J. Prospective evaluation of infrahisal second-degree AV block induced by atrial pacing in the presence of chronic bundle branch block and syncope. PACE 1996;19:784–792.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Englund A, Bergfeldt L, Rosenqvist M. Pharmacological stress testing of the His-Purkinje system in patients with bifascicular block. PACE 1998;21:1979–1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harthorne JW, Barold SS. Atherosclerosis, the conduction system and cardiac pacing. In: Fuster V, Ross R, Topol EJ (Eds.): Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996:1013–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barold SS. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for pacemaker implantation after acute myocardial infarction. What is persistent advanced block at the atrioventricular node? Am J Cardiol 1997;80:770–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Barold SS. Narrow QRS Mobitz type II second-degree atrioventricular block in acute myocardial infarction: true or false? Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1291–1294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheinman MM, Gonzalez RP. Fascicular block and acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1980;244:2646–2649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sclarovsky S, Strasberg B, Hirshberg A, Arditi A, Lewin RF, Agmon J. Advanced early and late atrioventricular block in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1984;108:19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Behar S, Zissman E, Zion M, Hod H, Goldbourt U, Reicher-Reiss H, Shalev Y, Kaplinsky E, Caspi A. Prognostic significance of second-degree atrioventricular block in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. SPRINT Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:831–834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Hampton JR, Hatala R, Fain E, Gent M, Connolly SJ; DINAMIT Investigators. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2481–2488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Massie B, Scheinman MM, Peters R, Desai J, Hirschfield D, O’Young J. Clinical and electrophysiologic findings in patients with paroxysmal slowing of the sinus rate and apparent Mobitz type II atrioventricular block. Circulation 1978;58:305–314.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Barold SS. Cardiac pacing in special and complex situations. Indications and modes of stimulation. Cardiol Clin 1992;10:573–591.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clarke M, Sutton R, Ward D, et al. Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Report of a working party of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group. Br Heart J 1991;66:185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review. Europace 2003;5:275–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barold SS, Herweg B. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: not ready for prime-time. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2005;13:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, Tsang V, Leung YL, Ho WY, Lau CP. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1451–1458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Victor F, Mabo P, Mansour H, Pavin D, Kabalu G, de Place C, Leclercq C, Daubert JC. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:238–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barold SS, Lau CP. Primary prevention of heart failure in cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:217–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tse HF, Lau CP. Selection of permanent ventricular pacing site: how far should we go? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1649–1651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:282–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Doshi RN, Daoud EG, Fellows C, Turk K, Duran A, Hamdan MH, Pires LA. Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (The PAVE Study). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:1160–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA, for the MOST Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932–2937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing. Circulation 2006;113:2082–2088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gillespie ND, Brett CT, Morrison WG, Pringle SD. Interpretation of the emergency electrocardiogram in junior hospital doctors. J Accid Emerg Med 1996;13:395–397.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Phibbs BP. Diagnosis of complex forms of AV block: some tricks, some booby traps. In: Phibbs BP, Advanced ECG. Boards and Beyond, Boston MA, Little, Brown, 1997:110–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barold, S.S., Herweg, B. (2008). Acquired Atrioventricular Block. In: Kusumoto, F.M., Goldschlager, N.F. (eds) Cardiac Pacing for the Clinician. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72763-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72763-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72762-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72763-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics