Behavioral Perspectives

  • Ronald A. Cohen


Behaviorism emerged in response to the early schools of psychology that had put a premium on the analysis of consciousness and subjective experience. With roots in the principles of associationism, objectivism, and logical positivism, behaviorism maintained that psychology should be an empirical science, its focus restricted to measurable behavior. This could be best accomplished by studying the characteristics of association formation between external events (stimuli) and the resulting responses. The term conditioning became synonymous with the process by which an associative linkage was established and learning occurred. By characterizing the relationship between the responses of the animal and the stimuli in its environment, learning theorists specified building blocks for more complex behaviors.


Conditioned Stimulus Conditioned Response Classical Conditioning Behavioral Inhibition Discrimination Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Donahoe, J., & Palmer, D. C. (1989). The interpretation of complex behavior: Some reactions to parallel distributed processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donahoe, J., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donahoe, J., & Burgos, J. E. (1999). Timing without a timer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 257–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Attention. In E. L. Thorndike (Ed.), The principles of teaching based on psychology (pp. 105–109). New York: AG Seiler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence; experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human learning. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes; an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sechenov, I. M., & Shaternikov, M. N. (1968). Selected works. Amsterdam: E.J. Bonset.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Inhibition of delay in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64(1), 114–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 74(1), 71–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67(4), 504–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Establishment of a positive reinforcer through contrast with shock. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67(2), 260–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74(3), 151–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rescorla, R. A. (1999). Associative changes in elements and compounds when the other is reinforced. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 25(2), 247–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rescorla, R. A. (2000). Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 26(4), 428–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mandel, I. J., & Bridger, W. H. (1973). Is there classical conditioning without cognitive expectancy? Psychophysiology, 10(1), 87–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Honig, W. K. (1969). Attention factors governing the slope of the generalization gradient. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mackintosh, N. J. (1965). The effect of attention on the slope of generalization gradients. British Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 87–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solomon, P. R., & Moore, J. W. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89(10), 1192–1203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spence, K. W., Kendler, H. H., & Spence, J. T. (1971). Essays in neobehaviorism; a memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Glanzman, D. L., Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1972). Stimulus generalization of habituation in spinal interneurons. Physiology & Behavior, 8(1), 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rescorla, R. A. (2006). Stimulus generalization of excitation and inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H., & Wagner, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110(1–2), 67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siddle, D. A. T., & Spinks, J. A. (1979). Orienting response and information processing: Some theoretical and empirical problems. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Obeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siddle, D. (1983). Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Exploratory behavior: I. Orienting responses. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism. New York: The People’s Institute Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 57, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lawrence, D. H. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zeaman, D., & House, B. J. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency (pp. 159–223). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Logan, F. A. (1972). Essentials of a theory of discrimination learning. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Tenets of neurobehaviorism (pp. 265–284). New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pearce, J. M., Esber, G. R., George, D. N., & Haselgrove, M. (2008). The nature of discrimination learning in pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 36(3), 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nevin, J. A., Davison, M., Odum, A. L., & Shahan, T. A. (2007). A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(2), 285–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Denny, M. R., Wells, R. H., & Maatsch, J. L. (1957). Resistance to extinction as a function of the discrimination habit established during fixed-ratio reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain (second printing ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Konorski, J. (1968). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. New York: Hafner Publications (Facsim. Reprint of the 1948 ed).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Konorski, J., Dickinson, A., & Boakes, R. A. (1979). Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum (distributed by Halsted Press Division of Wiley).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain; an interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Konorski, J. (1973). The role of prefrontal control in programming of motor behaviour. In J. D. Maser (ed.), Efferent organization and integrative behaviour. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Konorski, J. (1972). Physiological mechanisms of internal inhibition. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and learning. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bernheim, J. W., & Williams, D. R. (1967). Time-dependent contrast effects in a multiple schedule of food reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10(3), 243–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krane, R. V., & Ison, J. R. (1971). Positive induction in differential instrumental conditioning: Effect of the interstimulus interval. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75(1), 129–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Senf, G. M., & Miller, N. E. (1967). Evidence for positive induction in discrimination learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64(1), 121–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hull, C. L. (1970). Mathematico deductive theory of rote learning: A study in scientific methodology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spence, K. W., & Taylor, J. A. (1953). The relation of conditioned response strength to anxiety in normal, neurotic, and psychotic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 265–272.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Spence, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning (1956). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Denny, M. R. (1946). The role of secondary reinforcement in a partial reinforcement learning situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 373–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Amsel, A. (1989). Behaviorism, neobehaviorism, and cognitivism in learning theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kendler, H. H., & Kendler, T. S. (1966). Selective attention versus mediation: Some comments on Mackintosh’s analysis of two-stage models of discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 66(4), 282–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kendler, T. S. (1971). Continuity theory and cue-dominance. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Tenets of neurobehaviorism (pp. 237–264). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kendler, T. S., Basden, B. H., & Bruckner, J. B. (1970). Dimensional dominance and continuity theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2), 309–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Grusec, T. (1968). The peak shift in stimulus generalization: Equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(3), 239–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Terrace, H. S. (1963). Errorless discrimination learning in the pigeon: Effects of chlorpromazine and impiramine. Science (New York, N.Y.), 140, 318–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Terrace, H. S. (1973). Conditioned inhibition in successive discrimination learning. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 35(1), 39–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Terrace, H. S. (1985). On the nature of animal thinking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 643–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Honig, W. K. (1970). Attention and the modulation of stimulus control. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Terrace, H. S., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bignami, G., & Rosic, N. (1972). Acquisition and performance effects of scopolamine and of treatment withdrawal in avoidance situations. Physiology & Behavior, 8(6), 1127–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hoffman, H. S., & Barrett, J. (1971). Overt activity during conditioned suppression: A search for punishment artifacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16(3), 343–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Weiss, S. J. (1972). Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning. A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 78(3), 189–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Abramson, C. I., & Aquino, I. S. (2002). Behavioral studies of learning in the Africanized honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 59(1–2), 68–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bonardi, C. (1989). Inhibitory discriminative control is specific to both the response and the reinforcer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(3), 225–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Carr, A. F. (1974). Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning with rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86(4), 718–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lombas, A. S., Kearns, D. N., & Weiss, S. J. (2008). A comparison of the effects of discriminative and Pavlovian inhibitors and excitors on instrumental responding. Behavioural Processes, 78(1), 53–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schachtman, T. R., Kasprow, W. J., Chee, M. A., & Miller, R. R. (1985). Blocking but not conditioned inhibition results when an added stimulus is reinforced in compound with multiple pretrained stimuli. The American Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 283–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Weiss, S. J., Thomas, D. A., & Weissman, R. D. (1996). Combining operant-baseline-derived conditioned excitors and inhibitors from the same and different incentive classes: An investigation of appetitive-aversive interactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 357–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zimmer-Hart, C. L., & Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86(5), 837–845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Amsel, A. (1962). Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychological Review, 69(4), 306–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Amsel, A. (1992). Frustration theory–many years later. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 396–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Amsel, A., & Chen, J. S. (1976). Ontogeny of persistence: Immediate and long-term persistence in rats varying in training age between 17 and 65 days. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90(8), 808–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Amsel, A., Rashotte, M. E., & Mackinnon, J. R. (1966). Partial reinforcement effects within subject and between subjects. Psychological Monographs, 80(20), 1–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Amsel, A., & Surridge, C. T. (1964). The influence of magnitude of reward on the aversive properties of anticipatory frustration. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 321–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Surridge, C. T., & Amsel, A. (1966). Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 361–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lovejoy, E. (1965). An attention theory of discrimination learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mackintosh, N. J. (1965). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 124–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1968). Attention in learning theory and research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1975). Attention in learning: Theory and research. Huntington, NY: R. E. Krieger.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kendler, H. H., & Kendler, T. S. (1962). Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. Psychological Review, 69, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Colombo, J., Mitchell, D. W., Coldren, J. T., & Atwater, J. D. (1990). Discrimination learning during the first year: Stimulus and positional cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 98–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Burr, D., Banks, M. S., & Morrone, M. C. (2009). Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration. Experimental Brain Research, 198(1), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Koppen, C., & Spence, C. (2007). Seeing the light: Exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect. Experimental Brain Research, 180(4), 737–754.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fort, A., Delpuech, C., Pernier, J., & Giard, M. H. (2002). Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(1), 20–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Wagner, A. R., Mazur, J. E., Donegan, N. H., & Pfautz, P. L. (1980). Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 6(4), 376–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bordnick, P. S., Copp, H. L., Traylor, A., Graap, K. M., Carter, B. L., Walton, A., et al. (2009). Reactivity to cannabis cues in virtual reality environments. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(2), 105–112.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Waters, A. J., Carter, B. L., Robinson, J. D., Wetter, D. W., Lam, C. Y., Kerst, W., et al. (2009). Attentional bias is associated with incentive-related physiological and subjective measures. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(4), 247–257.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sargent, J. D., Morgenstern, M., Isensee, B., & Hanewinkel, R. (2009). Movie smoking and urge to smoke among adult smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(9), 1042–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Attwood, A. S., O’Sullivan, H., Leonards, U., Mackintosh, B., & Munafo, M. R. (2008). Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 103(11), 1875–1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Field, M., & Duka, T. (2004). Cue reactivity in smokers: The effects of perceived cigarette availability and gender. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 78(3), 647–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Shadel, W. G., Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Goldstein, M. G., Rohsenow, D. J., Sirota, A. D., et al. (1998). Scripted imagery manipulations and smoking cue reactivity in a clinical sample of self-quitters. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(2), 179–186.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Niaura, R., Shadel, W. G., Abrams, D. B., Monti, P. M., Rohsenow, D. J., & Sirota, A. (1998). Individual differences in cue reactivity among smokers trying to quit: Effects of gender and cue type. Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 209–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Juliano, L. M., & Brandon, T. H. (1998). Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: Evidence with urge and reaction time. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(1), 45–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Yanover, T., & Sacco, W. P. (2008). Eating beyond satiety and body mass index. Eating and Weight Disorders, 13(3), 119–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Nijs, I. M., Franken, I. H., & Muris, P. (2008). Food cue-elicited brain potentials in obese and healthy-weight individuals. Eating Behaviors, 9(4), 462–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ferriday, D., & Brunstrom, J. M. (2008). How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes? The British Journal of Nutrition, 100(6), 1325–1332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hill, A. J. (2007). The psychology of food craving. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 66(2), 277–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Carter, F. A., McIntosh, V. V., Joyce, P. R., & Bulik, C. M. (2001). Abstention during cue reactivity assessment is associated with better outcome among women with bulimia nervosa. Eating Behaviors, 2(3), 273–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Overduin, J., Jansen, A., & Eilkes, H. (1997). Cue reactivity to food- and body-related stimuli in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Addictive Behaviors, 22(3), 395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lee, J. H., Lim, Y., Wiederhold, B. K., & Graham, S. J. (2005). A functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) study of cue-induced smoking craving in virtual environments. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(3), 195–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Chiamulera, C. (2005). Cue reactivity in nicotine and tobacco dependence: A “multiple-action” model of nicotine as a primary reinforcement and as an enhancer of the effects of smoking-associated stimuli. Brain Research, 48(1), 74–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Waters, A. J., Shiffman, S., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2003). Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 98(10), 1409–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Spence, K. W. (1960). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. In K. W. Spence (Ed.), Behavior theory and learning: Selected papers (pp. 269–291). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Spence, K. W. (1978). Behavior theory and conditioning. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Grice, G. R. (1971). A threshold model for drive. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Tenets of neurobehaviorism. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Taylor, J. A. (1951). The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(2), 81–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald A. Cohen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry and AgingGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Center for Cognitive Aging and MemoryUniversity of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Warren Alpert School of MedicineBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations