Toward a Comprehensive Model of Social Dilemmas

  • Robert Gifford


Decision Maker Public Good Comprehensive Model Design Element Social Dilemma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bonacich, P. (1976). Secrecy and solidarity. Sociometry, 39, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brann, P., Foddy, M. (1987). Trust and the consumption of a deteriorating common resource. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budescu, D. V., Au, W. T., Chen, X. P. (1997). Effect of protocol of play and social orientation on behavior in sequential resource dilemmas. Experimental Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawes, R. M. (1973). The commons dilemma game: An N-person mixed motive game with a dominating strategy for defection. ORI Research Bulletin, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior communication and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a common dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawes, R. M., Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edney, J. J. (1981). Paradoxes on the commons: Scarcity and the problem of equality. Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edney, J. J. (1984). Rationality and social justice. Human Relations, 37, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edney, J. J., Bell, P. A. (1984). Sharing scarce resources: Group-outcome orientation, external disaster, and stealing in a simulated commons. Small Group Behavior, 15, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., Gärling, T. (2002). Spill-over effects of intermittent costs for defection in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gifford, R. (1987). Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice (1st ed.). Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  15. Gifford, R. (1994). A community study of the commons dilemma. Unpublished study, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  16. Gifford, R. (2002a). Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.). Colville, WA: Optimal Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gifford, R. (2002b). Resource management: A matter of life and death. Keynote address to the International Association of Applied Psychology, Singapore.Google Scholar
  18. Gifford, R. (2005). Resource dilemmas: A perspective from environmental psychology. Keynote address to the Nordic Environmental Social Science Conference, Gothenburg, June 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Gifford, R., Hine, D. W. (1997).Toward cooperation in commons dilemmas. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 29, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hine, D. W., Gifford, R. (1991). The commons dilemma: A quantitative review. Canadian Psychological Association annual meetings, Calgary, June.Google Scholar
  21. Hine, D. W., Gifford, R. (1997). What harvesters really think about in commons dilemma simulations: A grounded theory analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 29, 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Komorita, S. S., Lapworth, C. W. (1982). Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Komorita, S. S., Parks, C. D. (1994). Social Dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
  25. Leal, D. R. (1998). Community-run fisheries: Avoiding the “tragedy of the commons”. Pollution and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 19, 225–245.Google Scholar
  26. Liebrand, W., Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. (eds.) (1992). Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  27. Lloyd, W. F. (1837/1968). Lectures on Population, Value, Poor Laws and Rent. New York: August M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  28. Lomborg, B. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Liebrand, W. B. G. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  30. Moore, S. F., Shaffer, L. S., Pollak, E. L., Taylor-Lemeke, P. (1987). The effects of interpersonal trust and prior commons problem experience on commons management. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 19–29.Google Scholar
  31. Naseth, G. J. (1990). The effects of warning of impending resource depletion, resource control and environmental attitudes on behavior in a social dilemma. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(3-B), 1549.Google Scholar
  32. Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A., Messick, D. M. (1987). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Samuelson, C. D., Hannula, K. A. (2001). Group identity and environmental uncertainty in a sequential resource dilemma. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  34. Sato, K. (1989). Trust and feedback in a social dilemma. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 123–128.Google Scholar
  35. Schroeder, D. A. (ed.) (1995). Social Dilemmas: Perspectives on Individuals and Groups. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Shulz, U., Albers, W., Mueller, U. (eds.) (1994). Social Dilemmas and Cooperation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Simon, J. (1980). The Ultimate Resource. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, J. M., Bell, P. A., Fusco, M. E. (1988). The influence of attraction on a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of General Psychology, 115, 277–283.Google Scholar
  40. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Suleiman, R., Budescu, D., Fischer, I., Messick, D. (eds.) (2004). Contemporary Approaches to Social Dilemma Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tindall, D. B., O’Connor, B. (June 1987). Attitudes, social identity, social values, and behavior in a commons dilemma. Presentation at the Canadian Psychological Association Conference, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  43. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yamagishi, T., Shinada, M., Kasahara, M. (July 2005). Direct and indirect effects of punishment in social dilemmas. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference of Social Dilemma, Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Gifford
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations