Using Genetic Algorithms for Simulation of Social Dilemmas

  • Ilan Fischer

Studying social dilemmas and their underlying behavioral, cognitive, and evolutionary constructs is a more complicated challenge than most laboratory experiments or empirical data collection methods can meet. In contrast to those behaviors observed in a well defined laboratory setting, naturally occurring social dilemmas have a high level of complexity, interdependencies, and many non-linear links. Over the last three decades, several attempts have been made to study intricate social interactions by using computer simulations. A well-known study conducted by Robert Axelrod (1980a, b, 1981, 1984) examined the evolution of cooperation among agents who played a repeated prisoner’s dilemma game in a heterogeneous population. This seminal work inspired many more studies in diverse social science domains (see, for example, Latane & Novak’s (1997) study of attitude change, Fischer & Suleiman’s (1997) study of the evolution of intergroup cooperation, or Axelrod’s (1986) and Saam & Harrer’s (1999) studies on the influence of social norms).


Genetic Algorithm Personal Care Domestic Work Social Dilemma American Political Science Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axelrod, R. (1980a). Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1980b). More effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Science Review, 75, 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80, 1095–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chattoe, E. (1998). Just how (un) realistic are evolutionary algorithms as representations of social processes? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 1(3). http:/
  7. Dasgupta, D., Michalewicz, Z. (1997). Evolutionary algorithms—An overview. In D. Dasgupta & Z. Michalewicz (eds.), Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Applications (pp. 3–28). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, I., Suleiman, R. (1997). The emergence of cooperation in a simulated intergroup conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, I., Sullivan, O. (2007). Evolutionary modeling of time-use vectors. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.Google Scholar
  10. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gershuny, J., Sullivan, O. (1998). Sociological uses of time-use diary data. European Sociological Review, 14, 69–85.Google Scholar
  12. Gorrini, V., Dorigo, M. (1996). An application of evolutionary algorithms to the scheduling of robotic operations In J. M. Alliot, E. Lutton, E. Ronald & M. Schoenauer (eds.), Artificial Evolution. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  13. Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Latane, B., Nowak, A. (1997). Self-organizing social systems: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of consolidation, clustering, and continuing diversity. In G. Barnett & F. Boster (eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences: Persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 43–74). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, J. P (1997). Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Saam, N. J., Harrer, A. (1999). Simulating norms, social inequality, and functional change in artificial societies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2(1).
  17. Sullivan, O. (1996). The enjoyment of activities: Do couples affect each others’ well-being? Social Indicators Research, 38, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilan Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HaifaMount CarmelIsrael

Personalised recommendations