Advertisement

The Herdsman and the Sheep, Mouton, or Kivsa? The Influence of Group Culture on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

  • Shirli Kopelman

Does culture influence decision making in a global economy? Without doubt, culture influences the cuisine we prefer and whether we are likely to order and enjoy a rack of lamb smothered in a Southwestern U.S.-style barbeque sauce and a cold beer, lamb stew à la Provençale with a glass of red wine, or lamb marinated in fresh herbs and served over rice along with hot mint tea. Even in an era of fusion restaurants and widespread globalization, culture may influence how decision makers manage both local and global resources in situations that risk the tragedy of the commons—the classic example being the decision of a herdsman grazing sheep1 on a common pasture whether to cooperate or defect (G. Hardin, 1968). That is, the cultural context provides insights into the problem of cooperation. We may learn how to effectively manage resources in social dilemma settings (for a review, see Dawes, 1980; Messick & Brewer, 1983; Kopelman et al., 2002), by studying solutions that arise in distinct cultural settings (e.g., McCay, 2002; Ahn et al., 2004). Furthermore, even if a global management culture may be emerging, this by no means indicates homogeneity of group-level culture. Unique subcultures continue to emerge on an organizational and institutional level in which the effect of group-level factors such as cultural values and norms is critical to understanding behavior of decision makers (e.g., Gelfand & Brett, 2004; Markus & Kitayama, 1991). Therefore, it is important to incorporate culture into both the theoretical frameworks and the empirical research on cooperation in social dilemmas.

Keywords

Decision Maker Group Culture Social Motive Social Dilemma Experimental Social Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 335–343.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2002). Common Resources and Institutional Sustainability. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Sonich, & E. U. Weber (eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 41–85). Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ahn, T. K., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E. (2004). Signals, symbols, and human cooperation. In R. Sussman & A. Chapman (eds.) The Origins and Nature of Sociality (pp. 122–139). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195–204.Google Scholar
  5. Bettenhausen, K. L., Murnighan, J. K. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 350–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettenhausen, K. L., Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The development of an intragroup norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural challenges. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornstein, G. (1992). The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bornstein, G., Ben-Yossef, M. (1994). Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein, G., Erev, I., Goren, H. (1994). The effect of repeated play in the IPG and IPD team games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 690–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiating Globally. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Brett, J. M., Kopelman, S. (2004). Culture and social dilemmas. In G. Michelle & J. M. Brett (eds.), Negotiation and Culture: Research Perspectives (pp. 395–411). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Forgas, J. P. (1982). Episode cognition: Internal representations of interaction routines. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 59–103). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gelfand, M. J., Brett, J. M. (2004). The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gelfand, M. J., Dyer, N. (2000). A cultural perspective on negotiation: Progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Applied Psychology, 49, 62–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gärling, T. (1999). Value priorities, social value orientations and cooperation in social dilemmas. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardin, C. D., Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & H. E. Tory (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hemesath, M., Pomponio, X. (1998). Cooperation and culture: Students from China and the United States in a prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 32, 171–184.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Kashima, Y., Siegal, M., Tanaka, K., Isaka, H. (1988). Universalism in lay conceptions of distributive justice: A cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kopelman, S. (1999). Social motives and reciprocity in negotiations: Implications for cross-cultural settings. DRRC Working Paper #271.Google Scholar
  27. Kopelman, S. (2003). Culture and power asymmetry in resource negotiations: Implications for self-interested behavior in social dilemmas. Unpublished dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  28. Kopelman, S., Weber, J. M., Messick, D. M. (2002). Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Sonich & E. U. Weber (eds.), The Drama of the Commons (pp. 113–156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G., Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 576–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lalljee, M., Lamb, R., Abelson, R. P. (1992). The role of event prototypes in categorization and explanation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 153–182). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (pp. 640–675). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  34. Leung, K., Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luce, R. D., Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Lytle, A. M., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H., Janssens, M. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 167–214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mann, L., Radford, M., Kanagawa, C. (1985). Cross-cultural differences in children’s use of decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1557–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. March, J. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCay, B. J. (2002). Emergence of institutions for the commons: Contexts, situations, and events. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Sonich, & E. U. Weber (eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 361–402). Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers & B. Jonathan (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 11–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Messick, D. M. (1999). Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Messick, D. M., McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moghaddam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C. (1993). Social Psychology in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  45. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parks, C. D. (1994). The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parks, C. D., Vu, A. D. (1994). Social dilemma behavior of individuals from highly individualist and collectivist cultures. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 708–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Probst, T., Carnevale, P. J., Triandis, H. C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pruitt, D. G., Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roch, S. G., Samuelson, C. D. (1997). Effects of environmental uncertainty and social value orientation in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, Okuno-Fujiwara, Shamir. (1991). Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068–95.Google Scholar
  53. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, & G. Yoon (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: 85–117. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Shank, R. C., Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Snyder, M., Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor, D. M., Modhaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of Intergroup Relations (2nd ed.). London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  57. Thibaut, J. W., Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Triandis, H. C. (1972). The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Triandis, H. C. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  60. Triandis, H. C., Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Van Lange, P., De Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W., Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Lange, P., Liebrand, W., Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. (1992). Social dilemmas: The state of the art introduction and literature review. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick & H. A. Wilke (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings (pp. 3–28). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Okumura, T., Brett, J. M., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., Messick, D. M. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilke, H. A., de Boer, K. L., Liebrand, W. B. (1986). Standards of justice and quality of power in a social dilemma situation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–65.Google Scholar
  67. Wit, A., Wilke, H. (1988). Subordinates’ endorsement of an allocating leader in a commons dilemma: An equity theoretical approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wit, A., Wilke, H. A., Van Dijk, E. (1989). Attribution of leadership in a resource management situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shirli Kopelman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations