Advertisement

Delayed Cutaneous Fluid Leak After Removal of an Epidural Catheter

You are called after hours to evaluate clear liquid leaking from an “epidural catheter puncture hole.” The patient is a 50-yr-old Asian male (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 2) who had an exploratory laparotomy with gastrostomy for gastric cancer 5d before. He had an epidural catheter, through which epidural hydromorphone had been used until the 2nd postoperative day, when it was removed intact. The patient is sitting up in bed and not complaining of anything, not even a headache. His past history and examination are noncontributory

Keywords

Epidural Catheter Puncture Site Clear Liquid Anesthesiologist Physical Status Asian Male 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ennis M, Brock-Utne JG. Delayed cutaneous fluid leak from the puncture hole after removal of an epidural catheter. Anaesthesia 1993;48:317-318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vanner RG. Acetylcholinesterase - a specific marker for cerebrospinal fluid. Anaesthesia 1988;43:299-300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jawalekar SR, Marx GF. Cutaneous cerebrospinal fluid leakage following attempted extradural block. Anesthesiology 1981;54:348-349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morparia HK, Vontivillu J. Case report: Cerebrospinal fluid fistula - a rare complication of myelography. Clin Radiol 1991;44:205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downey L, Slater EM, Zeitlin GL. Differentiating interstitial fluid from cerebrospinal fluid. Anesthesiology 1985;63:120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liberman LM, Tourtellotte WW, Newkirk TA. Prolonged post-lumbar puncture cerebrospinal fluid leakage from lumbar subarachnoid space demonstrated by radio isotope myelography. Neurology 1971;21:925-929.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Personalised recommendations