Mediation using WSMO, WSML and WSMX

  • Tomas Vitvar
  • Maciej Zaremba
  • Matthew Moran
  • Adrian Mocan
Part of the Semantic Web And Beyond book series (ADSW, volume 8)

This chapter presents DERI's solution to solving SWS Challenge mediation sce-nario.We demonstrate our approach building upon an established Semantic Web Service Framework to facilitate interoperability within the execution of heterogeneous services that support both the RosettaNet standard and proprietary information models.


Customer Relationship Management Mapping Rule Semantic Description Abstract State Machine Customer Relationship Management System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Vitvar, T., Mocan, A., Kerrigan, M., Zaremba, M., Zaremba, M., Moran, M., Cimpian, E., Haselwanter, T., Fensel, D.: Semantically-enabled service oriented architecture: Con-cepts, technology and application. In Service Oriented Computing and Applications, Springer London 1(2) (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vitvar, T., Kopecky, J., Fensel, D.: WSMO-Lite: Lightweight Semantic Descriptions for Services on the Web. In: ECOWS. (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lloyd, J.W.: Foundations of Logic Programming (2nd edition). Springer-Verlag (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning (LPAR-1999). Number 1705, Springer-Verlag (1999) 161–180Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kopecký, J., Roman, D., Moran, M., Fensel, D.: Semantic Web Services Grounding. In: AICT/ICIW. (2006) 127Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kopecky, J., Vitvar, T., Bournez, C., Farrell, J.: Sawsdl: Semantic annotations for wsdl and xml schema. IEEE Internet Computing 11(6) (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Euzenat, J., Mochol, M., Shvaiko, P., Stuckenschmidt, H., Šváb, O., Svátek, V., van Hage, W.R., Yatskevich, M.: Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2006. In: Proceeding of International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006). Volume 225., Athens, Georgia, USA, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2006) 73–95Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cimpian, E., Mocan, A.: Wsmx process mediation based on choreographies. In: Business Process Management Workshops. (2005) 130–143Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mocan, A., Moran, M., Cimpian, E., Zaremba, M.: Filling the Gap — Extending Service Oriented Architectures with Semantics. In: ICEBE, IEEE Computer Society (2006) 594– 601Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kerrigan, M., Mocan, A., Tanler, M., Fensel, D.: The Web Service Modeling Toolkit -An Integrated Development Environment for Semantic Web Services. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-2007), System Description Track, Innsbruck, Austria, Springer-Verlag (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mocan, A., Cimpian, E., Kerrigan, M.: Formal model for ontology mapping creation. In: International Semantic Web Conference. (2006) 459–472Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roman, D., Scicluna, J.: Ontology-based Choreography of WSMO Services. Wsmo final draft v0.3, DERI (2006) Available at:
  13. 13.
    Kuster, U., Konig-Ries, B.: Dynamic binding for bpel processes — a lightweight approach to integrate semantics into web services. In: Second International Workshop on Engineering Service-Oriented Applications: Design and Composition (WESOA06) at 4th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC06), Chicago, Illinois, USA (2006) 00–00Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preist, C., Cuadrado, J.E., Battle, S., Williams, S., Grimm, S.: Automated Business-to-Business Integration of a Logistics Supply Chain using Semantic Web Services Technology. In: Proc. of 4th Int. Semantic Web Conference. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Motta, E., Domingue, J., Cabral, L., Gaspari, M.: IRS-II A Framework and Infrastructure for Semantic Web Services. The Semantic Web ISWC 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 2870 (2003) 306–318Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fensel, D., Benjamins, V., Motta, E., Wielinga, B.: UPML: A Framework for knowledge system reuse. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI-99), Stockholm, Sweden (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomas Vitvar
    • Maciej Zaremba
      • 1
    • Matthew Moran
      • 1
    • Adrian Mocan
      1. 1.Digital Enterprise Research InstituteNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland

      Personalised recommendations