Advertisement

The Psychosocial Context of Cancer-Related Infertility

  • Matthew J. Loscalzo
  • Karen L. Clark
Part of the Cancer Treatment and Research book series (CTAR, volume 138)

Fertility has always been associated with awe, curiosity, and magical thinking. Since the beginning of time, fertility has been deeply imbedded in the human experience and expressed throughout the ages by all cultures in symbolic art. In trying to decipher the atavistic meanings given to fertility, it is essential to consider the hostile world in which our progenitors struggled and eventually thrived. The population of the earth is an incredible success story. No species have ever so dominated the earth as have humans. Fertility has always been the central theme of our ancestors. In many ways, cancer, as a life-threatening disease, brings people back to their most basic and primitive selves.

Keywords

Health Care Professional Psychosocial Distress Malignant Ovarian Tumor Magical Thinking Psychosocial Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schover LR. Sexuality and fertility after cancer. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Cancer Institute. Facing forward: life after cancer treatment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zanagnolo V, Sartori E, Trussardi E, et al. Preservation of ovarian function, reproductive ability and emotional attitudes in patients with malignant ovarian tumors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;123:235–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hewitt M, Rowland J. Mental health service use among cancer survivors: analysis of the National Health Survey. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4581–4590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keller M, Sommerfieldt S, Fischer C, et al. Recognition of distress and psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients: a multi-method approach. Ann Oncol 2004;15:1243–1249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Connell S, Patterson C, Newman B. A qualitative analysis of reproductive issues raised by young Australian women with breast cancer. Health Care Women Int 2006;27:94–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Partridge H, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;20:4174–4183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thewes B, Taylor M, Phillips K, et al. Fertility-and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5155–5165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vinokur A, Threatt B, Vinokur-Kaplan D, et al. The process of recovery from breast cancer for younger and older patients: changes during the first year. Cancer 1990;65:1242–1254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hann D, Baker F, Denniston M, et al. The influence of social support on depressive symptoms in cancer patients: age and gender differences. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:279–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baider L, Cooper C, Kaplan-DeNour A, editors. Cancer and the family. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baider L, Andritsch E, Goldzweig G, et al. Changes in psychological distress of women with breast cancer in long-term remission and their husbands. Psychosomatics 2004;45:58–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weihs K, Enright T, Howe G, et al. Marital satisfaction and emotional adjustment after breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 1999;17:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim Y, Loscalzo M, Wellisch D, et al. Gender differences in caregiving stress among caregivers of cancer survivors, Psycho-oncology 2006;15:1085–1092.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Loscalzo
    • 1
  • Karen L. Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations