Today's Research, Tomorrows Cures: The Ethical Implications of Oncofertility
In contemporary society, translational medical research is the name of hope itself. For many, advances in modern medicine can be seen as a steady progression of science over dreadful and intractable illnesses, especially illness of children and young adults. Advances in the creation of families and protection of children have most clearly marked medicine’s success. Yet every scientific discovery and medical advance carries with it the inevitable dilemmas of choice and power. This chapter will look carefully at the effect on treatment when two trajectories of translational research converge to form a new field of inquiry—the field of oncofertility—and explore the ethical and social implications of the power that such research will create.
KeywordsOvarian Tissue Stem Cell Research Fertility Preservation Ethical Implication Premature Ovarian Failure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Beckman CRB, Ling FW, Laube DW, et al. Chapter 39: Infertility In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, fourth edition. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, 2002:494–507.Google Scholar
- 2.Assisted reproductive technology success rates for 2004. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ART/index.htm. Accessed March 17, 2007.
- 3.American Cancer Society. Facts and figures 2003. Available at http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/stt_0.asp. Accessed March 17, 2007.
- 7.Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2006;86:S142–S147.Google Scholar
- 14.Brock DW. Funding new reproductive technologies: should they be included in health insurance benefit packages? In: Cohen CB, editor. New ways of making babies: the case of egg donation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996:213–230.Google Scholar
- 15.Robertson JA. The presumptive primacy of procreative liberty. In: Children of choice: freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994:23–42.Google Scholar
- 20.Department of Health and Human Services. 45 CFR §46.401–408. Revised June 18, 1991.Google Scholar
- 23.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2nd ed. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/ethics/. Accessed March 17, 2007.
- 25.Weithhorn LA, Scherer DG. Children’s involvement in research participation decisions: psychological considerations. In: Grodin MA, Glantz LH, editors. Children as research subjects: science, ethics and law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994:133–179.Google Scholar
- 27.Chandra AJ, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, et al. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Heath Stat 2005:23.Google Scholar
- 28.Edwards R, Steptoe P. A matter of life: the story of a medical breakthrough. New York: William Morrow and Co., 1980.Google Scholar
- 29.American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations. Pediatrics 1995;95:286–294.Google Scholar