Skip to main content

Instrumentation of the Care Keys Research

  • Chapter
Care-Related Quality of Life in Old Age

Research on care-related quality of life (crQoL) focuses mainly on the interaction between the quality of care (QoC) and the quality of life (QoL). However, the conditions for a good QoC are also important, that is the resources, structures and processes which facilitate good care outcomes. For comprehensive evaluation of care-related QoL, all the perspectives that have been included in the multi-dimensional and multi-actoral evaluation model developed in the Care Keys project are important. Hence, the instrumentation of the research carried out within Care Keys was designed to cover all the different elements within the meta-model and quality matrix that guided the project:

  1. 1.

    Subjective QoL in old persons receiving home care or care in institutional settings, and determinants of it.

  2. 2.

    Objective (assessed) QoL in old persons, and determinants of it.

  3. 3.

    QoL in old persons with dementia.

  4. 4.

    Subjective QoC in old persons using home care or care in institutional settings, and determinants of it.

  5. 5.

    Professional quality of home care and care in institutional settings, and determinants of it.

  6. 6.

    Quality management of home care and care in institutional settings, and determinants of it.

It followed from this, firstly, that instruments were needed for carrying out interviews with clients to access their subjective perceptions about their QoL and the QoC they received. Secondly, instruments had to describe the QoL as professionally assessed and documented including professional (e.g. clinical) care outcomes. Thirdly, instruments were required for the evaluation of the QoL of older persons with dementia, who may be unable to provide the information themselves. Fourthly, a standardised instrument was needed for the collection of information on professional QoC, covering key components within the meta-model. Fifthly, an instrument was required to collect all the information needed from the perspective of management. Besides quality management information, the instrument also had to collect information at the organisational level on such issues as material resources, costs and organisational structures for quality management. The information sources for this information were the care managers at different management levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexopoulos, G. S., Abrams, R. C., Young, R. C., & Shamoian, C. A. (1988). Cornell scale for depression in dementia. Biological Psychiatry, 23, 271–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 725–733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balcombe, N. R., Ferry, P. G., & Saweirs, W. M. (2001). Nutritional status and well being. Is there a relationship between body mass index and the well-being of older people? Current Medical Research and Opinion, 17(1), 1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes, & M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging. Perspectives from the behavioural sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., & Mayer, K. U. (Eds.). (1999). The Berlin Aging Study, aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families. In P. Benner, Ch. A. Tanner, & C. A. Chesla Pflegeexperten, Pflegekompetenz, klinisches Wissen und alltägliche Ethik. Bern: Hans Huber, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blonski, H., & Stausberg, M. (Eds.). (2003). Prozessmanagement in Pflegeorganisationen. Hannover: Schlütersche Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (1991). Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales. Glasgow: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, J., & Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment. Explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5(1), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brod, M., Stewart, A. L., Sands, L., & Walton, P. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL). The Gerontologist, 39, 25–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, E. (2000). Looking after well-being: A tool for evaluation. Journal of Dementia Care, 8(6), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. (2003). Qualitätsmanagement für Dienstleistungen. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden. 4., verbesserte. Auflage: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Helsinki (2002). Social Services Department. Handbook for documentation. Unpublished, in internal use only, updated 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, V., Harvey, G., West, E., McKenna, H., & Keeney, S. (2005). Relationships between quality of care, staffing levels, skill mix and nurse autonomy: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 73–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daatland, S. O. (1990). What are families for? On family solidarity and preferences for help. Ageing and Society, 10, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong-Gierveld, J., & van Tilburg, T. (1999). Manual of the loneliness scale. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (UK). (2003), Domiciliary Care: National Minimum Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (1969). Some issues in evaluation the quality of nursing care. American Journal of Public Health, 59, 1833–1836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J. A., Duffy, M., & Kilbourne, W. (1997). Cross national study of perceived service quality in long-term care facilities. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(4), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskola, I., & Valvanne, J. (2000). Kotihoidon kehittäminen Helsingissä (Home Care Programme for Helsinki City) Sosiaaliviraston julkaisusarja A 7/2000. City of Helsinki, Social Services Department, Helsingin kaupungin sosiaalivirasto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M., Folstein, S., & McHugh, P. (1975). Mini mental state, a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedag, H. R., & Schmidt, W. (2004). Balanced scorecard. Planegg bei München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, A. (2001). Qualitätsbeurteilung und Evaluation in der Qualitätssicherung in Pflegeheimen (Quality assessment and evaluation in quality assurance in nursing homes). Bern: Huber Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geron, S. M., Smith, K., Tennstedt, S., Jette, A., Chassler, D., & Kasten, L. (2000). The home care satisfaction measure: A client-centred approach to assessing the satisfaction of frail older adults with home care services. Journal of Gerontology (B): Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, S259–S270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, L., & Maselino-Okai, C. (1986). Senior Monitor. An index of the quality of nursing care for senior citizens on hospital wards. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic Products Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Growing Older Project. <http://www.shef.ac.uk/uni/projects/gop>.

  • Görres, St. (1999). Qualitätssicherung in Pflege und Medizin (Quality assurance in care and medicine). Bern: Huber Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1967). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmaier, S. L., Sloane, P. D., Guess, H. A., Koch, G. G., Mitchell, C. M., & Phillips, C. D. (1995). Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: Agreement with the mini-mental state examination. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 50(2), M128–M133.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haubrock, M., & Gohlke, S. (2001). Benchmarking in der Pflege (Benchmarking in care. A benchmarking study of home care services). Bern: Huber Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L. (1998). Assuring quality in nursing home care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 232–237.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Translating strategy into action. The balanced scorecard. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, C. L., & Aldridge, C. R. (1985). The dexamethasone suppression test and depressive signs in dementia. Journal of Affective Disorders, 8, 83–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kercher, K. (1992). Assessing subjective well-being in the old-age. Research on Ageing, 14, 131–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitwood, T., & Bredin, K. (1992). A new approach to the evaluation of dementia care. Journal of Advances in Health and Nursing Care, 1(5), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann, U., Little, T., & Smith, J. (2002). Perceiving control: A double-edged sword in old age. Journal of Gerontology. Psychological Sciences, 57B(6), 484–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P. (2001). Quality of care and quality of life in dementia care units. In L. S. Noelker, & Z. Harel (Eds.), Linking Quality of Long-Term Care and Quality of Life (pp. 148). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, P., Beevor, A., Hogman, G., Hyslop, J., Lathlean, J., & Ward, M. (2001). Carers’ and users’ expectations of services—user version (CUES-U): A new instrument to measure the experience of users of mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 67–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (2002). Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 510–519.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Löwenstein, A., Katz, R., Mehlhausen-Hassoen, D., & Prilutzky, D. (2002). The Research Instruments in the OASIS Project–Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Haifa, The Center for Research and Study of Ageing–The Faculty for Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, F., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, G. M. (1986). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Mehr, D. R., Hawes, C., Phillips, C., Mor, V., et al. (1994). MDS cognitive performance scale. Journal of Gerontology, 49M, 174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., Fries, B. E., Steel, K., Ikegami, N., Bernabei, R., Carpenter, G. I., et al. (1997). Comprehensive Clinical Assessment in Community Settings: Applicability of the MDS-HC. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 1017–1024.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muurinen, S. (2003). Hoitotyö ja hoitohenkilöstön rakenne vanhusten lyhytaikaisessa laitoshoidossa (Care and staff-mix in institutional respite care for elderly). Academic Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, 936. Tampere University Press. Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, P. R. (2003). Balanced scorecard–Schritt für Schritt. Einführung, Anpassung und Aktualisierung. Weinheim: Wiley GmbH & Co. KG&A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvretveit, J. (1998). Evaluating health interventions. An introduction to evaluation of health treatments, services, policies and organizational interventions. Buckingham, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paljärvi, S., Rissanen, S., & Sinkkonen, S. (2003). Kotihoidon sisältö ja laatu vanhusasiakkaiden, omaisten ja työntekijöiden arvioimana - Seurantatutkimus Kuopion kotihoidosta. Gerontologia, 2, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). ‘SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality’. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1986). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 58, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 19, 2–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porell, F., & Caro, F. G. (1998). Facility-level outcome performance measures for nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 38, 665.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S., & WHOQOL-OLD Group (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-Old module. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynes, N., Temple, B., Glenister, C., & Coulthard, L. (2001). Quality at home for older people: Involving service users in defining home care specifications. Bristol: The Policy Press. Published in association with Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready, R. E., Ott, B. R., Grace, J., & Fernandez, I. (2002). The Cornell-Brown Scale for Quality of Life in Dementia. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord, 16(2), 109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, K., Tiit, E.-M., & Käärik, E. (2000). Health and coping of older Estonians. University of Tartu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, K., Tiit, E.-M., & Vähi, M. (2003). Measuring and modelling the quality of life of older Estonians. The 7th Tartu Conference on Multivariate Statistics. Abstracts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixma, H. J., van Campen, C., Kerssens, J. J., & Peters, L. (2000). Quality of care from the perspective of elderly people: The QUOTE-elderly instrument. Age and Ageing, 29, 173–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solem, P. E. (2003). Forskningsinstrumentene i norLAG (Research instruments in norLAG). norLAG. Den norske studien av livsløp, aldring og generasjon. Oslo: NOVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, W. D., & Mukamel, D. B. (1998). Using outcomes to make inference about nursing home quality. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 21, 291–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis-Nayak, V. (2001). In search of a universal satisfaction survey tool: An analysis of satisfaction-survey instruments for nursing home residents, families and staff. A report submitted to the American Health Care Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urman, G. C., & Urman, H. N. (1997). Measuring consumer satisfaction in nursing home residents. Nutrition, 13, 705–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M. (2004). Ikääntyneiden toimintakyky ja hoivapalvelut. Nykytila ja vuosi 2015 (Independent living and QoL in Old Age, and the role of care. State of the Art in Finland and prospects up to the year 2015). In Ikääntyminen voimavarana. Tulevaisuusselonteon liiteraportti 5 (Ageing as a resource). Valtioneuvoston kanslian julkaisusarja 33/2004. Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy. <www.vnk.fi/julkaisut>.

  • Vaarama, M., Hakkarainen, A., & Laaksonen, S. (1999). Vanhusbarometri 1998 (Old Age Barometer 1998). Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 1999:3. Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M., & Hertto, P. (2003). Efficiency and equity of the care of older persons—exploring an evaluation model. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología. <http://www.stakes.fi/carekeys/presentations.html>.

  • Vaarama, M., & Kaitsaari, T. (2002). Ikääntyneiden toimintakyky ja koettu hyvinvointi (Functional ability in old age and subjective well-being). In M. Heikkilä, & M. Kautto (Eds.), Suomalaisten hyvinvointi (Well-being of Finns). Jyväskylä: Gummerus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M., Mattila, V., Laaksonen, S., & Valtonen, H. (1997), Target efficiency. Report on development and piloting of the target efficiency indicators and model, STAKES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M., Pieper, R., & Sixsmith, A. (2006). Care-related quality of life. The concept and empirical exploration. In H. Mollenkopf, & A. Walker (Eds.), Quality of life in old age. International and Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvanne, J. (2005). Integrating social and health care in practice—A Finnish example. In M. Vaarama, & R. Pieper. Managing integrated care for older persons. Stakes and the European Health Management Association, Gummerus Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy. A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item Short Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, M. F., Martin-Cook, K., Svetlik, D. A., Sainem, K., Foster, B., & Fontaine, C. S. (2000). The quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 1, 114–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-Bref quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1988). Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 52(4), s.35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigmund, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vaarama, M. et al. (2008). Instrumentation of the Care Keys Research. In: Vaarama, M., Pieper, R., Sixsmith, A. (eds) Care-Related Quality of Life in Old Age. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72169-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72169-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72168-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72169-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics