Advertisement

Quality of Life and Dementia

  • Andrew Sixsmith
  • Margaret Hammond
  • Grant Gibson

Cognitive impairment due to age-related dementia such as Alzheimer’s disease will present considerable challenges to health and social care services as populations age worldwide. As well as expanding services to meet increased numbers of people with dementia, the challenge will also involve providing care that will ensure a good quality of life (QoL) for people who are vulnerable and dependent. Dementia also presents considerable challenges in terms of developing frameworks for evaluating the quality of care. The Care Keys approach emphasises the need to incorporate measures of QoL and well-being in the evaluation of care, while also ‘giving a voice’ to the client by eliciting their views on their own well-being and satisfaction with the services they receive. However, this is problematic with cognitively impaired people who may be unable to comprehend questions, formulate coherent answers and articulate and communicate their views. This has often resulted in people with dementia being excluded from research into QoL (cf. Balcombe, Ferry, & Saweirs, 2001). Recent research on QoL in dementia has attempted to address this situation (Torrington, 2006), arguing that the views and responses of people with dementia should still be taken seriously. However, there are limits to this when the severity of the dementia may prevent meaningful verbal communication and, in these situations, alternative approaches are required.

Unfortunately, approaches to assessing QoL for people with dementia remain conceptually and methodologically weak. A traditional biomedical perspective generally frames the experience of dementia in terms of cognitive decline and associated functional impairment. However, alternative perspectives suggest that QoL in dementia is more than just cognition (Banerjee et al., 2006) and that a wider perspective encompassing aspects of the person, context and care (Sixsmith & Gibson, 2006) need to be considered. As far as the concept of crQoL is concerned, a number of key theoretical and methodological issues need to be resolved. Firstly, are the concepts underlying the crQoL model appropriate to people with dementia? Secondly, are ideas of subjective well-being that have been developed particularly in respect to non-demented people, applicable to people with dementia? Finally, can care make a difference to the QoL of people with dementia? In this context, this chapter presents some of the results of work carried out within the Care Keys project that specifically addressed the needs of people with dementia.

Keywords

Depression Europe Dementia Income Dehydration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexopoulos, G. S., Abrams, R. C., Young, R. C., & Shamoian, C. A. (1988). Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Biological Psychiatry, 23, 271–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Balcombe, N. R., Ferry, P. G., & Saweirs, W. M. (2001). Nutritional status and well being. Is there a relationship between body mass index and the well-being of older people? Current Medical Research Opinion, 17(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, S., Smith, S., Lamping, D., Harwood, R., Foley, B., Smith, P., Murray, J., Prince, M., Levin, E., Mann, A., & Knapp, M. (2006). Quality of life in dementia: More than just cognition. An analysis of associations with quality of life in dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77, 146–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, H., & Martin, W. (2002). Ethical issues in Dementia care Research. In H. Wilkinson, (Ed.), The perspectives of people with dementia. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  6. Blackman, T., Mitchell, L., Burton, E., Jenks, M., Parsons, M., Raman, S., & Williams, K. (2003). The accessibility of public space for People with Dementia: a priority for the ‘open city’. Disability and Society, 18(3), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, J. (1999). Quality of life for People with Dementia. Approaches to the Challenge of Measurement. Ageing and Society, 19, 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferri, C. P., Prince, M., Brayne, C., Brodaty, H., Fratiglioni, L., Ganguli, M., Hall, K., Hasegawa, K., Hendrie, H., & Huang, Y. (2005). Global Prevalence of Dementia: A Delphi consensus study. The Lancet, 366, 2112–2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & Mchugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofman, A., Rocca, W. A., & Breteler, M. M. B. (1991). The prevalence of dementia in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980–1990 findings. International Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 736–748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Katsuno, T. (2005). Dementia from the Inside: how people with early stage dementia evaluate their quality of life. Ageing and Society, 25(2), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia geriatric center morale scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawton, M. P. (1991). A multidimensional view of quality of life. In J. E. Birren, J. E. Lubben, J. C. Rowe, & D. E. Deutchman (Eds.), The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly (pp. 3–27). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–674). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Molloy, D. W., Alemayehu, E., & Roberts, R. (1991). Reliability of a Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148: 102–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Mehr, D. R., Hawes, C., Phillips, C., Mor, V., & Lipsitz, L. A. (1994). MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. Journal of Gerontology, 49(4), M174–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Malley, L., & Croucher, K. (2005). Housing and Dementia Care–a scoping review of the literature Health and Social Care in the Community, 13(6), 570–577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sixsmith, A., & Gibson, G. (2006). Music and well-being in dementia: A qualitative study. Ageing and Society, 27(1), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas, A. J., & O’Brien, J. T. (2002). Alzheimer’s Disease. In R. Jacoby, C. Oppenheimer, (Eds.), Psychiatry in the Elderly (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, L. (2005). Is it possible to conceptualise and measure quality of life for people with severe Alzheimer’s Disease. Generation review, 15(1), 22–24.Google Scholar
  22. Thornton, A., Hatton, C., & Tatham, A. (2004). Dementia Care Mapping Reconsidered: Exploring the reliability and validity of the observational tool. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(8), 718–726.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Torrington, J. (2006). What has architecture got to do with dementia care? Explorations of the relationship between quality of life and building design in two EQUAL projects. Quality in Ageing, 7(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
  24. Wattis, J. P., & Curran, S. (2001). Practical psychiatry of old age (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press.Google Scholar
  25. Weiner, M. F., Martin-Cook, K., Svetlik, D. A., Saine, K., Foster, B., & Fontain, C. S. (2000). The quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale. J Am Med Dir Assn, 1, 114–116.Google Scholar
  26. WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment Psycological Medicine, 28, 551–558.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, K. (2006). Private communication, 6th April 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Sixsmith
    • 1
  • Margaret Hammond
  • Grant Gibson
  1. 1.Department of GerontologySimon Fraser University at Harbour CentreVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations