Advertisement

How Disadvantaged Groups Members Position Themselves: When They Might Appear to Work Against an Improvement in Status for Their Own Group

  • Donald M. Taylor
  • Julie Caouette
  • Esther Usborne
  • Michael King
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Keywords

Disadvantaged Group Social Identity Theory Intergroup Relation Social Psychology Bulletin Advantage Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The perils of political correctness: Men’s and women’s response to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R., & Smith, A. (1989). Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in negro children. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, V. W. (1997). Homophily or the queen bee syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research, 28, 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowan, G., Neighbors, C., DeLaMoreaux, J., & Behnke, C. (1998). Women’s hostility toward women. Psychology of Women Quaterly, 22, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crisp, R. J., Stone, C. H., & Hall, N. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawes, A., & Finchilescu, G. (2002). What’s changed? The racial orientations of South African adolescents during rapid political change. Childhood, 9, 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation and common ingroup identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 109–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The under representation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fajak, A., & Haslam, S. A. (1998). Gender solidarity in hierarchical organizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 73–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: The Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 247–278). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson, D. E., & Cordova, D. I. (1999). Women’s and men’s roles models: The importance of exemplars. In A. J. Murress, F. J. Crosby, & R. J. Ely (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas (pp. 121–142). Mahwah, Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Gonzalez, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323–368). London: Guilford.Google Scholar
  19. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hornsey, M. J., van Leeuwen, E., & van Santen, W. (2003). Dragging down and Dragging up: Relative group status affects responses to common fate. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huo, Y. J., Molina, L. E., Sawahata, R., & Deang, J. M. (2005). Leadership and the management of conflicts in diverse groups: Why acknowledging versus neglecting subgroup identity matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, C., Schaller, M., & Mullen, B. (2000). Social categorization and stereotyping: ‘You mean i’m one of “them”?’ British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.Google Scholar
  25. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Social-influence processes of control and change: Conformity, obedience to authority, and innovation. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 347–366). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Mathison, D. L. (1986). Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moghaddam, F. M. (1999). Reflexive positioning: culture and private discourse. In R. Harré & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional actions (pp. 74–86). Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Sarnoff, I. (1951). Identification with the aggressor: Some personality correlates of anti-Semitism among Jews. Journal of Personality, 20, 199–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Branscombe, N. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination at work. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenber, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory of organizational practice (pp. 277–292). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. Staines, G., Tavris, C., & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7, 55–60.Google Scholar
  38. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African-Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Intergroup relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  41. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1999). Positioning in intergroup relations. In R. Harré & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional actions (pp. 178–194). Boston:Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, D. M., & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291–300.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, D. M., Moghaddam, F. M., & Bellrose, J. (1989). Social comparison in an intergroup context. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & St-Pierre, L. (1999). Neosexism among women: The role of personally experienced social mobility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Vaughan, G. M. (1978). Social change and intergroup preferences in New Zealand. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vonk, R., & Olde-Monnikhof, M. (1998). Gender subgroups: Intergroup bias within the sexes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright, S. C. (1997). Ambiguity, social influence, and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 23, 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 647–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1999). Success under tokenism: Co-option of the newcomer and the prevention of collective protest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald M. Taylor
  • Julie Caouette
  • Esther Usborne
  • Michael King

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations