Advertisement

Nuclear Positioning and Supererogatory Duties: The Illustrative Case of Positioning by Iran, the United States, and the European Union

  • Fathali M. Moghaddam
  • Kathryn A. Kavulich
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Keywords

European Union International Atomic Energy Agency International Community Security Council Uranium Enrichment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alverado, R. (1999). A common law: The law of nations and western civilization. Aaltenm, The Netherlands: Pietas press.Google Scholar
  2. Finkel, N., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 105–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  3. Finkel, N., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2004b). The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  4. Louis, W. R., & Taylar, D. M. (2004). Rights and duties as group norms. In N. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties (pp. 105–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  5. Louis, W. R., & Taylor, D. M. (2004). Rights and duties as group norms: Implications of intergroup research for the study of rights and duties.Google Scholar
  6. Moghaddam, F. M. (2004). The cycle of rights and duties in intergroup relations: Interobjectivity and perceived justice re-assessed. New Review of Social Psychology, 3, 125–130.Google Scholar
  7. Moghaddam, F. M., Hanley, E., & Harré, R. (2003). Sustaining intergroup harmony: An analysis of the Kissinger papers through positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal political, and cultural contexts (pp. 137–155). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  8. Moghaddam, F. M., & Kavulich, K. A. (2007). Nuclear positioning: The case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the European Union, and the United States of America. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 576–590). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pew Research Center (2006). Conflicting views in a divided world. How global publics view: Muslim-Western issues, U.R. role in the world, Asian rivalries. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Tan, S., & Moghaddam, F. (1999a). Positioning in intergroup relations. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove, Positioning theory (pp. 178–194). oxford, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1995). Reflexive positioning and culture. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 25, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1999c). Positioning in intergroup relations. In R. Harré & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of international actions (pp. 178–194). Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1999b). Reflexive positioning: culture and private discourse. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 74–86). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fathali M. Moghaddam
  • Kathryn A. Kavulich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations