This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alverado, R. (1999). A common law: The law of nations and western civilization. Aaltenm, The Netherlands: Pietas press.
Finkel, N., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 105–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Finkel, N., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2004b). The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Louis, W. R., & Taylar, D. M. (2004). Rights and duties as group norms. In N. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties (pp. 105–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Louis, W. R., & Taylor, D. M. (2004). Rights and duties as group norms: Implications of intergroup research for the study of rights and duties.
Moghaddam, F. M. (2004). The cycle of rights and duties in intergroup relations: Interobjectivity and perceived justice re-assessed. New Review of Social Psychology, 3, 125–130.
Moghaddam, F. M., Hanley, E., & Harré, R. (2003). Sustaining intergroup harmony: An analysis of the Kissinger papers through positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal political, and cultural contexts (pp. 137–155). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Moghaddam, F. M., & Kavulich, K. A. (2007). Nuclear positioning: The case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the European Union, and the United States of America. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 576–590). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pew Research Center (2006). Conflicting views in a divided world. How global publics view: Muslim-Western issues, U.R. role in the world, Asian rivalries. Washington, DC: Author.
Tan, S., & Moghaddam, F. (1999a). Positioning in intergroup relations. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove, Positioning theory (pp. 178–194). oxford, MA: Blackwell.
Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1995). Reflexive positioning and culture. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 25, 387–400.
Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1999c). Positioning in intergroup relations. In R. Harré & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of international actions (pp. 178–194). Boston: Blackwell.
Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1999b). Reflexive positioning: culture and private discourse. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 74–86). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moghaddam, F.M., Kavulich, K.A. (2008). Nuclear Positioning and Supererogatory Duties: The Illustrative Case of Positioning by Iran, the United States, and the European Union. In: Moghaddam, F.M., Harré, R., Lee, N. (eds) Global Conflict Resolution Through Positioning Analysis. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72112-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72112-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72111-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72112-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)