Ethical Issues in Historical Archaeology

  • Mary C. Beaudry

Archaeologist and philosopher of science Alison Wylie has observed that the very identity of archaeology as a discipline is closely linked to how its practitioners frame their concerns around ethical issues (Wylie, 1996). Prior to the late 1970s, most archaeologists developed a sense of ethically appropriate behavior on more or less an individual, ad hoc basis, relying upon whatever role models presented themselves during graduate training and upon subsequent personal experience in the office or in the field. This informal and highly idiosyncratic approach to professional ethics is not serviceable in the contemporary milieu in which archaeology is practiced, as Brian Fagan (1993) and others have noted. A series of developments since the 1970s reflect the growing sense among professional archaeologists, particularly those working in the United States and the United Kingdom, that they need some sort of structured approach to deal with the ethical issues they confront.


Ethical Issue Oral History Historical Archaeology Cultural Resource Management American Archaeology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aitchison, K., and Edwards, R., 2003, Archaeology Labour Market Intelligence: Profiling the Profession 2002/03. Cultural Heritage National Training Organization, Bradford, England, and the Institute of Field Archaeologists, Reading, England.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, B., and Montell, W.L., 1981, From Memory to History: Using Oral Sources in Local Historical Research. American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  3. Archaeological Institute of America, 1994, “Archaeological Institute of America, Code of Professional Standards.” Text passed by the Council of the American Institute of Archaeology on December 29, 1994. In Archaeological Ethics, edited by K.D. Vitelli, pp. 261–263. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  4. Beaudry, M.C., 1984, Crisis in Archaeological Publication. Context (the newsletter of the Center for Archaeological Studies at Boston University) 4(1–2):14–15.Google Scholar
  5. Beaudry, M.C., 1994a, Women Historical Archaeologists: Who’s Counting? In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology, edited by M.C. Nelson, S.M. Nelson, and A. Wylie, pp. 225–228. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, No. 5. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Beaudry, M.C., 1994b, Cowgirls with the Blues? A Study of Women’s Publication and the Citation of Women’s Work in Historical Archaeology. In Women in Archaeology, edited by C.P. Claassen, pp. 138–158. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  7. Beaudry, M.C., 1995, Introduction: Ethnography in Retrospect. In The Written and the Wrought: Complementary Sources in Historical Anthropology, edited by M.E. D’Agostino, M. Winer, E. Prine, and E. Casella, pp. 1–15. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 79. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  8. Beaudry, M.C., 1996, Reinventing Historical Archaeology. In Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, edited by L.A. De Cunzo and B.L. Herman, pp. 473–497. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Delaware (distributed by University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville).Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, R., 2006, Bridging the Two Cultures—Commercial Archaeology and the Study of Prehistoric Britain. The Antiquaries Journal 86:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brumfiel, E.M., 2003, It’s a Material World: History, Artifacts, and Anthropology. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 32:205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for Archaeology in the Public Interest, 2007, The Archaeology in Social Context PhD Track, May 14, 2007, Bloomington, Indiana,∼capi/index.htm
  12. Cheek, C.D., editor, 1998, Perspectives on the Archaeology of Colonial Boston: The Archaeology of the Central Artery/Tunnel Project, Boston, Massachusetts. Historical Archaeology 32(3).Google Scholar
  13. Courtney, P., 2007, Historians and Archaeologists: An English Perspective. Historical Archaeology 41(2):34–45.Google Scholar
  14. De Cunzo, L.A., 1995, Reform, Respite, Ritual: An Archaeology of Institutions; The Magdalen Society of Philadelphia, 1800–1850. Historical Archaeology 29(3).Google Scholar
  15. De Cunzo, L.A., 1996, Introduction: People, Material Culture, Context, and Culture in Historical Archaeology. In Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, edited by L.A. De Cunzo and B.L. Herman, pp. 1–18. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Delaware (distributed by University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville).Google Scholar
  16. Egan, G., 2005, Report of the Portable Antiquities Scheme 2004. Post-Medieval Archaeology 39:328–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elia, R.J., 1992, The Ethics of Collaboration: Archaeologists and the Whydah Project. Historical Archaeology 26(4):105–117.Google Scholar
  18. Elia, R.J., 1997, Looting, Collecting, and the Destruction of Archaeological Resources. Nonrenewable Resources 6(2):85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elia, R.J., 1998, Professional Ethics. In Encyclopedia of Underwater and Maritime Archaeology, edited by J.P. Delgado, pp. 327–328. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  20. Fagan, B., 1993, The Arrogant Archaeologist. Archaeology 46(6):14–16.Google Scholar
  21. Fagan, B., 1995, Archaeology’s Dirty Secret. Archaeology 48(4):14–17.Google Scholar
  22. Farnsworth, P., 1993, “What Is the Use of Plantation Archaeology?” No Use at All, if No One Else Is Listening! Historical Archaeology 27(1):114–116.Google Scholar
  23. Frankena, W.K., 1973, Ethics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Franklin, M., and McKee, L., editors, 2004, Transcending Boundaries, Transforming the Discipline: African Diaspora Archaeologies in the New Millenium. Historical Archaeology 38(1).Google Scholar
  25. Gero, J., 1993, The Social World of Prehistoric Facts: Gender and Power in Paleo-indian Research. In Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, edited by H. du Cros and L. Smith, pp. 31–40. Occasional Papers in Prehistory, No. 23. Department of Prehistory, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  26. Goldman, A.H., 1992, Professional Ethics. In Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by L.C. Becker, pp. 1018–1020. Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, M.A., 1997, Michigan State Considers New Archaeology Curriculum. SHA Newsletter 30(1):14–15.Google Scholar
  28. Harrington, S., 1993, Bones and Bureaucrats. Archaeology 46(2):28–38.Google Scholar
  29. Hoopes, J., 1979, Oral History: An Introduction for Students. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Howson, J.E., 1990, Social Relations and Material Culture: A Critique of the Archaeology of Plantation Slavery. Historical Archaeology 24(4):78–91.Google Scholar
  31. Hutson, S.R., 2002, Gendered Citation Practices in American Antiquity and Other Archaeology Journals. American Antiquity 67:331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Institute of Field Archaeologists, 1994, Code of Conduct. Ratified and Adopted as IFA By-law, June 3, 1985; amended October 14, 1994.Google Scholar
  33. Karskens, G., 1999, Inside the Rocks: The Archaeology of a Neighbourhood. Hale and Iremonger, Sydney.Google Scholar
  34. Lawrence, S., and Karskens, G., 2003, Historical Archaeology in the Antipodes. Historical Archaeology 37(1):1–5.Google Scholar
  35. Lawrence, S., and Shepherd, N., 2006, Historical Archaeology and Colonialism. In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, edited by D. Hicks and M.C. Beaudry, pp. 69–86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. Leahy, K.A., 2003, Middle Saxon Lincolnshire: An Emerging Picture. In Markets in Early Medieval Europe, Trading and Productive Sites, 650–850, edited by T. Pestell and K. Ulmschneider, pp. 138–154. Windgather Press, Macclesfield, England.Google Scholar
  37. Leahy, K.A., and Paterson, C., 2001, New Light on the Viking Presence in Lincolnshire. In Vikings and the Danelaw: Select Papers from the Proceedings of the Thirteenth Viking Congress, edited by J. Graham-Campbell, R. Hall, J. Jesch, and D.N. Parsons, pp. 181–202. Oxbow, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Lees, W.B., and King, J.A., 2007, What Are We Really Learning through Publicly Funded Historical Archaeology (and Is It Worth the Considerable Expense?). Historical Archaeology 41(2):54–61.Google Scholar
  39. Little, B.J., editor, 2002, Public Benefits of Archaeology. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  40. Little, B.J., 2007, What Are We Learning? Who Are We Serving? Publicly Funded Historical Archaeology and Public Scholarship. Historical Archaeology 41(2):72–79.Google Scholar
  41. Lynott, M.J., 1997, Ethical Principles and Archaeological Practice: Development of an Ethics Policy. American Antiquity 62:589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lynott, M.J., and Wylie, A., editors, 1995a, Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Special Report, Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. Lynott, M.J., and Wylie, A., 1995b, Stewardship: The Central Principle of Archaeological Ethics. In Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s, edited by M.J. Lynott and A. Wylie, pp. 28–32. Special Report, Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  44. McDavid, C., and Babson, D.W., editors, 1997, In the Realm of Politics: Prospects for Public Participation in African-American and Plantation Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 31(3):1–152.Google Scholar
  45. McKee, L., 1994, Is It Futile to Try and Be Useful? Historical Archaeology and the African-American Experience. Northeast Historical Archaeology 23:1–7.Google Scholar
  46. Majewski, T., 1995, Teaching Historical Archaeology. SHA Newsletter 28(1):22–23.Google Scholar
  47. Meskell, L., 2002, The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 31:279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meskell, L., and Pels, P., 2005a, Introduction: Embedding Ethics. In Embedding Ethics, edited by L. Meskell and P. Pels, pp. 1–26. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Meskell, L., and Pels, P., editors, 2005b, Embedding Ethics. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. Metheny, K.B., 2007, From the Miners’ Doublehouse: Archaeology and Landscape in a Pennsylvania Coal Company Town. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  51. Mrozowski, S.A., 1996, Nature, Society, and Culture: Theoretical Considerations in Historical Archaeology. In Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, edited by L.A. De Cunzo and B.L. Herman, pp. 447–472. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Delaware (distributed by University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville).Google Scholar
  52. Mrozowski, S.A., 2006, The Archaeology of Class in Urban America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  53. Mrozowski, S.A., Ziesing, G.H., and Beaudry, M.C., 1996, Living on the Boott: Historical Archaeology at the Boott Mills Boardinghouses, Lowell, Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.Google Scholar
  54. Murphy, L.E., Beaudry, M.C., Adams, R.E.W., and Brown, J.A., 1995, Commercialization: Beyond the Law or Above It? Ethics and the Selling of the Archaeological Record. In Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s, edited by M.J. Lynott and A. Wylie, pp. 38–41. Special Report, Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  55. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (Public Law 101–601, November 16, 1990, 25 U.S.C. para 3001 et. seq.). Federal Register, Friday, May 28, 1993. (Final rule available on the National Archeological Database at
  56. Noble, V.E., 2007, Making Connections: Beyond the Confines of Compliance. Historical Archaeology 41(2):67–71.Google Scholar
  57. Orser, C.E., Jr., and Fagan, B., 1995, Historical Archaeology. Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Palmer, M., 2007, Names and Agenda: Industrial and Post-mediaeval Archaeology Today. The Archaeologist (Journal of the Institute of Field Archaeologists) 64:9–11.Google Scholar
  59. Patterson, T.C., 1995, Toward a Social History of Archaeology in the United States. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth, Texas.Google Scholar
  60. Portable Antiquities Scheme, 2007, Finds Database, The British Museum, London, May 28, 2007,
  61. Potter, P.B., Jr., 1991, What is the Use of Plantation Archaeology? Historical Archaeology 25(3):94–107.Google Scholar
  62. Purser, M., 1992, Oral History and Historical Archaeology. In Text-Aided Archaeology, edited by B.J. Little, pp. 25–35. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  63. Purser, M., 2007, What This Place Needs Is a Few More Cats. Historical Archaeology 41(2):62–66.Google Scholar
  64. Pyburn, K.A., and Wilk, R.R., 1995, Responsible Archaeology is Applied Anthropology. In Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s, edited by M.J. Lynott and A. Wylie, pp. 71–76. Special Report, Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  65. ROPA Task Force, 1997, Proposal for the Establishment of the Register of Professional Archaeologists. SHA Newsletter 30(1):27–33.Google Scholar
  66. Scarre, C., and Scarre, G., editors, 2006, The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  67. Seifert, D.J., editor, 2005, Sin City. Historical Archaeology 39(1).Google Scholar
  68. Shackel, P.A., and Winter, S.E., editors, 1994, An Archaeology of Harpers Ferry’s Commercial and Residential District. Historical Archaeology 28(4).Google Scholar
  69. Shepherd, N., 2006, Archaeology at the Sharp End of the Trowel. Archaeologies (Journal of the World Archaeological Congress) 2(2):4–6.Google Scholar
  70. Shepherd, N., 2007, Archaeology Dreaming: Post-apartheid Urban Imaginaries and the Bones of the Prestwich Street Dead. Journal of Social Archaeology 7:3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Singleton, T.A., 2006, African Diaspora Archaeology in Dialogue. In Afro-Atlantic Dialogues, edited by K.A. Yelvington, pp. 249–287. School of Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  72. Society for American Archaeology, 1995, By-laws. In Archaeologists of the Americas: 1995 Membership Directory, pp. 17–25. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  73. Society for American Archaeology, 1996, Society for American Archaeology Principles of Archaeological Ethics. American Antiquity 61:451–452.Google Scholar
  74. Society for American Archaeology, 2007, Fifth Annual Ethics Bowl. Washington, D.C., May 14, 2007,
  75. Society for Historical Archaeology, 1992, Ethical Positions. Article VII of the Constitution of the Society for Historical Archaeology. SHA Newsletter 25(2):32–36.Google Scholar
  76. Society of Professional Archaeologists, 1988, Code of Ethics and Standards of Research Performance. In Guide to the Society of Professional Archaeologists, October 1988. Reproduced in Archaeological Ethics, edited by K.D. Vitelli, pp. 264–265. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  77. Stuart, I., 2007, Crossing the Great Divide. Historical Archaeology 41(2):46–53.Google Scholar
  78. Symonds, J., O’Neill, R., and Jessop, O., 2006, What Can We Learn from the Excavation and Building Recording of Cutlery Sites in Sheffield? Post-Medieval Archaeology 40:214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tabah, A., 1993, Native American Collections and Repatriation. Technical Information Service’s Forum. Occasional Papers on Museum Issues and Standards, June 1993. American Association of Museums, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  80. Van Bueren, T.M., editor, 2002, Communities Defined by Work: Life in Western Work Camps. Historical Archaeology 36(3).Google Scholar
  81. Vitelli, K.D., editor, 1996, Archaeological Ethics. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  82. Wilson, J., 1995, The Archaeology of Shakespeare: The Material Legacy of Shakespeare’s Theatre. Alan Sutton, London.Google Scholar
  83. World Archaeological Congress, 2007, WAC Ethics Meeting, Department of Archaeology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, May 27, 2007,
  84. Worrell, J., Simmons, D.M., and Stachiw, M.O., 1996, Archaeology from the Ground Up. In Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, edited by L.A. De Cunzo and B.L. Herman, pp. 55–70. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Delaware (distributed by University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville).Google Scholar
  85. Wylie, A., 1996, Ethical Dilemmas in Archaeological Practice: Looting, Repatriation, Stewardship, and the (Trans)formation of Disciplinary Identity. Perspectives on Science 4(2):154–194.Google Scholar
  86. Yamin, R., editor, 2001, Becoming New York: The Five Points Neighborhood. Historical Archaeology 35(3).Google Scholar
  87. Yow, V.R., 1994, Recording Oral History: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
  88. Zimmerman, L.J., 1994, Sharing Control of the Past. Archaeology 47(6):65, 67–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations