Skip to main content

Darwinism and Historical Archaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Historical Archaeology

In its classic formulation, Darwinism is a theory about why certain organisms do better in particular environments than do other organisms and hence over time leave more descendants. The theory says nothing about the archaeological record. Thus, archaeologists interested in applying a Darwinian perspective to the study of the material record have had to spend considerable time in constructing logical theoretical and methodological arguments as to how this can be accomplished in a nonreductionistic manner (e.g., Hurt and Rakita, 2001; Lipo et al., 2006a; Lyman and O’Brien, 1998; O’Brien, 1996a; O’Brien and Lyman, 2000, 2002a, 2003a, 2003b; O’Brien et al., 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Now revised and updated, this essay originally appeared under the title “Darwinian Evolutionism Is Applicable to Historical Archaeology,” in International Journal of Historical Archaeology 4:71–112, published by Springer.

  2. 2.

    Interestingly, Wedgwood considered the addition of cobalt oxide to the glaze to be a change in rather than an improvement over what his firm had been producing (Finer and Savage, 1965:237). Towner (1957:3–4) downplays the significance of pearlware, noting that it should be classified simply as a creamware variant. The important point here is not the terminology but the recognition that there was no grand disjunction between creamware and pearlware. Rather, selection against a cream-colored body led to the evolution of vessels that were whiter in color. That evolutionary line continued back through creamware, which, as Towner (1957:1) points out, was itself the direct descendant of lead-glazed wares of the Middle Ages.

  3. 3.

    Although we use the term “selected for,” no feature is really selected “for.” Rather, one state of a feature is selected against, which causes an alternative state of that feature to rise in relatively frequency.

References

  • Allen, M.S., 1996, Style and Function in East Polynesian Fish-Hooks. Antiquity 70:97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth, D.B., 2002, Evidence and Metaphor in Evolutionary Archaeology. American Antiquity 67:435–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G., 1997, The Basics of Selection. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R.L., and Richerson, P.J., 1996, The State of Evolutionary Archaeology: Evolutionary Correctness, or the Search for the Common Ground. In Darwinian Archaeologies, edited by H.D.G. Maschner, pp. 221–231. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D.W., and O’Connell, J.F., 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 14:143–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J.T., 1980, The Evolution of Culture in Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J.T., 1988, The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J.L., and Smith, E.A., 1998, Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology 39:S141–S173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and Richerson, P.J., 1992, How Microevolutionary Processes Give Rise to History. In History and Evolution, edited by M.H. Nitecki and D.V. Nitecki, pp. 179–209. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N., 1990, Adaptation and Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.M., 1983, Adaptation. In Dimensions of Darwinism, edited by M. Grene, pp. 287–314. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.M., 1992, Adaptation: Historical Perspectives. In Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, edited by E.F. Keller and E.A. Lloyd, pp. 7–12. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., 1990, The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., and Dethlefsen, E., 1965, The Doppler Effect and Archaeology: A Consideration of the Spatial Aspects of Seriation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 21:196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., and Dethlefsen, E., 1971, Some Social Aspects of New England Colonial Mortuary Art. In Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices, edited by J.A. Brown, pp. 30–38. Memoirs, No. 25. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C., 1995, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefsen, E., and Deetz, J., 1966, Death’s Heads, Cherubs, and Willow Trees: Experimental Archaeology in Colonial Cemeteries. American Antiquity 31:502–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C., 1970, Seriation Method and its Evaluation. American Antiquity 35:305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C., 1971, Systematics in Prehistory. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C., 1978, Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy. American Antiquity 43:192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C., 1981, Seriation, Groups, and Measurements. In Manejo de datos y métodos matemáticos de arqueología, compiled by G.L. Cowgill, R. Whallon, and B.S. Ottaway, pp. 67–90. Union Internacional de Ciencias Prehistóricas y Protohistóricas, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C., 1986, Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 9, edited by M.B. Schiffer, pp. 149–207. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C., 1989, Aspects of the Application of Evolutionary Theory in Archaeology. In Archaeological Thought in America, edited by C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, pp. 35–49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J.W., 2000, Practice Makes within 5% of Perfect: Visual Perception, Motor Skills, and Memory in Artifact Variation. Current Anthropology 41:663–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., 1850, On the Date of British Coins. The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Numismatic Society 12(4):127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, A., and Savage, G., editors, 1965, The Selected Letters of Josiah Wedgwood. Adams and Makay, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D.C., 1994, Stratocladistics: Morphological and Temporal Patterns and Their Relation to Phylogenetic Process. In Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature, edited by L. Grande and O. Rieppel, pp. 133–171. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.A., 1938, A Chronological Method Applicable to the Southeast. American Antiquity 3:260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., 1965, Is Uniformitarianism Necessary? American Journal of Science 263:223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., 1986, Evolution and the Triumph of Homology, or Why History Matters. American Scientist 74:96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., 1996, Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. Harmony, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., 1997, The Exaptive Excellence of Spandrels as a Term and Prototype. National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings 94:10750–10755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., and Lewontin, R.C., 1979, The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 205:581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.C., 1954, Dating Stem Fragments of Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Clay Tobacco Pipes. Quarterly Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Virginia 9(1):9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., 1979, Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hower, R.M., 1932, The Wedgwoods—Ten Generations of Potters. Journal of Economic and Business History 4:281–313, 665–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, T.D., and Rakita, G.F.M., editors, 2001, Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J., 1956, Evolution, Cultural and Biological. In Current Anthropology, edited by W.L. Thomas, Jr., pp. 3–25. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.T., Leonard, R.D., and Abbott, A.L., 1995, The Structure of Selectionist Explanations in Archaeology. In Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, edited by P.A. Teltser, pp. 13–32. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, A.V., 1916, The Pottery of the Casas Grandes District, Chihuahua. In Holmes Anniversary Volume: Anthropological Essays, edited by F.W. Hodge, pp. 253–268. Bryan, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, A.V., 1917, A Design-Sequence from New Mexico. National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings 3:369–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, A.V., 1924, An Introduction to the Study of Southwestern Archaeology, with a Preliminary Account of the Excavations at Pecos. Papers of the Southwestern Expedition, No. 1. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniffen, F.B., 1965, Folk Housing: Key to Diffusion. Association of American Geographers, Annals 55:549–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A.L., 1917, The Superorganic. American Anthropologist 19:163–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A.L., 1931, Historical Reconstruction of Culture Growths and Organic Evolution. American Anthropologist 33:149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, J., 1984, The Ecological Theory of Bureaucracy: The Case of Josiah Wedgwood and the British Pottery Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 29:330–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, M.L., 1979, Man, Mind, and Science: A History of Anthropology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R.D., and Jones, G.T., 1987, Elements of an Inclusive Evolutionary Model for Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6:199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I.M., 1959, The Concept of Natural Selection: A Centennial View. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103:173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipo, C.P., Madsen, M.E., Dunnell, R.C., and Hunt, T., 1997, Population Structure, Cultural Transmission, and Frequency Seriation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16:301–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipo, C.P., O’Brien, M.J., Collard, M., and Shennan, S.J., editors, 2006a, Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipo, C.P., O’Brien, M.J., Collard, M., and Shennan, S.J., 2006b, Cultural Phylogenies and Explanation: Why Historical Methods Matter. In Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory, edited by C.P. Lipo, M.J. O’Brien, M. Collard, and S.J. Shennan, pp. 3–16. Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., 2001, Culture Historical and Biological Approaches to Identifying Homologous Traits. In Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology, edited by T.D. Hurt and G.F.M. Rakita, pp. 69–89. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and Harpole, J.L., 2002, A.L. Kroeber and the Measurement of Time’s Arrow and Time’s Cycle. Journal of Anthropological Research 58:313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 1997, The Concept of Evolution in Early Twentieth-Century Americanist Archaeology. In Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory in Archeological Explanation, edited by C.M. Barton and G.A. Clark, pp. 21–48. Archeological Papers, No. 7. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 1998, The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology: History and Explanation. Current Anthropology 39:615–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 2000, Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19:39–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 2002, Classification. In Darwin and Archaeology: A Handbook of Key Concepts, edited by J.P. Hart and J.E. Terrell, pp. 69–88. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 2003, Cultural Traits: Units of Analysis in Early Twentieth-Century Anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 59:225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 2005, Within-Taxon Morphological Diversity in Late-Quaternary Neotoma as a Paleoenvironmental Indicator, Bonneville Basin, Northwestern Utah, USA. Quaternary Research 63:274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., and O’Brien, M.J., 2006, Seriation and Cladistics: The Difference between Anagenetic and Cladogenetic Evolution. In Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory, edited by C.P. Lipo, M.J. O’Brien, M. Collard, and S.J. Shennan, pp. 65–88. Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., O’Brien, M.J., and Dunnell, R.C., 1997, The Rise and Fall of Culture History. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., Wolverton, S., and O’Brien, M.J., 1998, Seriation, Superposition, and Interdigitation: A History of Americanist Graphic Depictions of Culture Change. American Antiquity 63:239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1959, Darwin and the Evolutionary Theory in Biology. In Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal, edited by B.J. Meggers, pp. 1–10. Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1961, Cause and Effect in Biology. Science 134:1501–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.D., 1972, Agricultural Regionalization: Origins and Diffusion in the Upper South before 1860. In International Geography, vol. 2, edited by W.P. Adams and F.M. Helleiner, pp. 740–742. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.D., 1978, The Formation of Early American Cultural Regions: An Interpretation. In European Settlement and Development in North America: Essays on Geographical Change in Honour and Memory of Andrew Hill Clark, edited by R. Gibson, pp. 66–90. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H., 1992, Ceramics and Evolution. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, edited by M.B. Schiffer, pp. 141–193. University of Arizona Press, Tueson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, F.D., 1995, Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Implications for Middle Woodland Ceramic Diversity. American Antiquity 60:7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, F.D., 1999, Colonial North America’s Consumer Revolution in Evolutionary Perspective. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitecki, M.H., and Nitecki, D.V., editors, 1992, History and Evolution. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., editor, 1996a, Evolutionary Archaeology: Theory and Application. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., 1996b, The Historical Development of an Evolutionary Archaeology. In Darwinian Archaeologies, edited by H.D.G. Maschner, pp. 17–32. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Holland, T.D., 1990, Variation, Selection, and the Archaeological Record. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 2, edited by M.B. Schiffer, pp. 31–79. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Holland, T.D., 1992, The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation. American Antiquity 57:36–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Holland, T.D., 1995a, Behavioral Archaeology and the Extended Phenotype. In Expanding Archaeology, edited by J.M. Skibo, W.H. Walker, and A.E. Nielsen, pp. 143–161. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Holland, T.D., 1995b, The Nature and Premise of a Selection-Based Archaeology. In Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, edited by P.A. Teltser, pp. 175–200. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., Holland, T.D., Hoard, R.J., and Fox, G.L., 1994, Evolutionary Implications of Design and Performance Characteristics of Prehistoric Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1:259–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lewarch, D.E., 1984, The Built Environment. In Grassland, Forest, and Historical Settlement: An Analysis of Dynamics in Northeast Missouri, by M.J. O’Brien, pp. 231–265. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., Lewarch, D.E., Saunders, J.E., and Fraser, C.B., 1980, An Analysis of Historic Structures in the Cannon Reservoir Area, Northeast Missouri. Technical Report 80-17. Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., 1998, James A. Ford and the Growth of Americanist Archaeology. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., 1999, Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., 2000, Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., 2002a, Evolutionary Archeology: Current Status and Future Prospects. Evolutionary Anthropology 11:26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., 2002b, The Epistemological Nature of Archaeological Units. Anthropological Theory 2:37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., 2003a, Cladistics and Archaeology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and Lyman, R.L., editors, 2003b, Style, Function, Transmission: Evolutionary Archaeological Perspectives. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., Lyman, R.L., and Leonard, R.D., 1998, Basic Incompatibilities between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity 63:485–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., Lyman, R.L., and Leonard, R.D., 2003, What Is Evolution? A Reply to Bamforth. American Antiquity 68:573–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, R.J., 1988, Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology. Systematic Zoology 37:142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C.E., Jr., 1988a, The Material Basis of the Postbellum Tenant Plantation: Historical Archaeology in the South Carolina Piedmont. University of Georgia Press, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C.E., Jr., 1988b, The Archaeological Analysis of Plantation Society: Replacing Status and Caste with Economics and Power. American Antiquity 53:735–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C.E., Jr., 1989, On Plantations and Patterns. Historical Archaeology 23:28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, J.S., 1977, Artifacts and Status Differences: A Comparison of Ceramics from Planter, Overseer, and Slave Sites on an Antebellum Plantation. In Research Strategies in Historical Archeology, edited by S. South, pp. 91–118. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, J.S., 1984, Cannon’s Point Plantation, 1794–1860: Living Conditions and Status Patterns in the Old South. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramenofsky, A.F., and Steffen, A., editors, 1998, Unit Issues in Archaeology: Measuring Time, Space, and Material. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup, D.M., Gould, S.J., Schopf, T.J.M., and Simberloff, D.S., 1973, Stochastic Models of Phylogeny and the Evolution of Diversity. Journal of Geology 81:525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, I.B., 1939, Prehistory in Haiti: A Study in Method. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 21. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B., 1996, Some Relationships between Behavioral and Evolutionary Archaeologies. American Antiquity 61:643–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B., 2004, Studying Technological Change: A Behavioral Perspective. World Archaeology 36:579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B., 2005, The Devil Is in the Details: The Cascade Model of Invention Processes. American Antiquity 70:485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B., and Skibo, J.M., 1987, Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology 28:595–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B., and Skibo, J.M., 1997, The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity 62:27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B., Skibo, J.M., Boelke, T.C., Neupert, M.A., and Aronson, M., 1994, New Perspectives on Experimental Archaeology: Surface Treatments and Thermal Response of the Clay Cooking Pot. American Antiquity 59:197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J.H., 1982, Twelve Fallacies of Uniformitarianism. Geology 10:455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, S.R., 1992, Ethnoarchaeology: Obnoxious Spectator, Trivial Pursuit, or the Keys to a Time Machine? In Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s Future, edited by L. Wandsnider, pp. 186–198. Occasional Paper, No. 20. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G., 1949, The Meaning of Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G., 1963, Historical Science. In The Fabric of Geology, edited by C.C. Albritton, Jr., pp. 24–48. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G., 1970, Uniformitarianism: An Inquiry into Principle, Theory, and Method in Geohistory and Biohistory. In Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, edited by M.K. Hecht and W.C. Steere, pp. 43–96. Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J.M., Schiffer, M.B., and Reid, K.C., 1989, Organic Tempered Pottery: An Experimental Study. American Antiquity 54:122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.B., 1994, Systematics and the Fossil Record: Documenting Evolutionary Patterns. Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., 1984, The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S., 1977, Method and Theory in Historical Archeology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S., 1978, Pattern Recognition in Historical Archaeology. American Antiquity 43:223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A.B., 1993, Concepts of Time and Approaches to Archaeological Reasoning in Historical Perspective. American Antiquity 58:235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.M., 1981, The New Evolutionary Time Table: Fossils, Genes, and the Origin of Species. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L., 1984, The New Eighteenth Century. New York Review of Books 31:42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F.S., and Bock, W.J., 1991, Evolutionary Theory and Systematics: Relationships between Process and Patterns. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 29:1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teltser, P.A., 1995, Culture History, Evolutionary Theory, and Frequency Seriation. In Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, edited by P.A. Teltser, pp. 51–68. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towner, D.C., 1957, English Cream-Coloured Earthenware. Faber and Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaz Pinto, I., Schiffer, M.B., Smith, S., and Skibo, J.M., 1987, Effects of Temper on Ceramic Abrasion Resistance: a Preliminary Investigation. Archeomaterials 1:119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M.J., 1992, Adaptation: Current Usages. In Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, edited by E.F. Keller and E.A. Lloyd, pp. 13–18. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.A., 1959, The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G.R., and Phillips, P., 1958, Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, S., and R.L. Lyman, 2000, Immanence and Configuration in Analogical Reasoning. North American Archaeologist 21:233–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. O’Brien .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Brien, M.J., Lyman, R.L. (2009). Darwinism and Historical Archaeology. In: Gaimster, D., Majewski, T. (eds) International Handbook of Historical Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72071-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics