International Efforts: Perspectives, Policies, and Programs

  • Patricia Findley
  • Catherine P. Wilson

With more people surviving cancer, it has become more likely that these cancer survivors can continue to work for many years following diagnosis and primary treatment. This chapter will provide a review of factors that are associated with work and the policies and programs in representative countries to address aspects of work in cancer survivors. Concepts of work, work disability following cancer, and optimization of function after primary cancer treatment in cancer survivors in various countries will be highlighted to identify some common themes and approaches across various nations, including an examination of the few programs that currently exist to support return to work efforts.


Cancer Survivor Breast Cancer Survivor Work Ability Disability Pension Vocational Rehabilitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Berrino F, Gatta G, Chessa E, Valente F, Capocaccia R. The EUROCARE II study. Eur J Cancer. 1998 Dec 1; 34(14):2139–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Mar; 17(1):83–92.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Wouden JC, Greaves-Otte JG, Greaves J, Kruyt PM, van Leeuwen O, van der Does E. Occupational reintegration of long-term cancer survivors. J Occup Med. 1992; 34:1084–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL. Employment patterns of long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2002 May–Jun; 11(3):188–98.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D. Breast cancer survival, work, and earnings. J Health Econ. 2002 Sep; 21(5):757–79.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feuerstein M, ed. Handbook of Cancer Survivorship. New York: Springer 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arrossi S, Matos E, Zengarini N, Roth B, Sankaranayananan R, Parkin M. The socio-economic impact of cervical cancer on patients and their families in Argentina, and its influence on radiotherapy compliance. Results from a cross-sectional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 May; 105(2):335–40.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen HM, Tan WH, Tan WC, Yu CK, Lim TH, Tay MH, et al. Attitudes toward cancer survivors: a small survey. Singapore Med J. 2006 Feb; 47(2):143–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drolet M, Maunsell E, Mondor M, Brisson C, Brisson J, Masse B, et al. Work absence after breast cancer diagnosis: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2005 Sep 27; 173(7):765–71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Citizens Advice Bureau. Advice guide. [cited 2008 February 21]; Available from: http:/
  12. 12.
    Prinz C, ed. European Disability Pension Policies. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company. 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Micheli A, Coebergh JW, Mugno E, Massimiliani E, Sant M, Oberaigner W, et al. European health systems and cancer care. Ann Oncol. 2003; 14(Suppl 5):v41–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Current trends in disability pensions in Europe. Seminar; 2003 April 8, 2003; Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Centre for Pensions. 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Office of Economic and Co-operation Development. New ways of addressing partial work capacity OECD thematic review on sickness, disability and work issues paper and progress report. 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    US General Accounting Office. SSA disability return to work strategies from other systems may improve federal programs. 1996:GAO/HEHS-96-133.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bartsch J. What is the benefit of oncological rehabilitation programs for cancer patients in palliative care? Therapeutische Umschau. 2001; 58:453–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Drolet M, Coyle D, Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, et al. Wage losses in the year after breast cancer: extent and determinants among Canadian women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 5; 100(5):321–32.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ministry of Health and Long-Term care. Targeting cancer: An action plan for cancer prevention and detection (Cancer 2020). [cited 2008 March 11]; Available from:
  20. 20.
    Office of Economic and Co-operation Development. OECD Ecomonic Surveys: Denmark. 2006.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion. Norwegian Social Insurance Scheme. [cited 2008 February 19]; Available from:
  22. 22.
    Johannesen TB, Langmark F, Wesenberg F, Lote K. Prevalence of Norwegian patients diagnosed with childhood cancer, their working ability and need of health insurance benefits. Acta Oncol. 2007; 46(1):60–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Economic and Development Review Committee. Policy brief: Economic survey of Norway, 2005. In: Office of Economic and Co-operation Development, ed. 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Disability Rights Commission. A guide to the disability discrimination act for peole with HIV, cancer, and MS. 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Canadian Human Rights Commisssion. Canadian Human Rights Act. [cited 2007 December 23]; Available from:
  26. 26.
    Office of Public Sector Information. Disability Rights Act of 2005. [cited 2007 December 8]; Available from:
  27. 27.
    Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, Lauzier S, Fraser A. Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology. 1999 Nov–Dec; 8(6):467–73.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:345–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Marikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006; 14:427–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Masse B, Deschenes L. Work situation after breast cancer: Results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96:1813–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anonymous. Attendance and absence. IRS Employment Review. 2006; 848:17.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dein S. Explanatory models of and attitudes toward cancer in different cultures. Lancet Oncol. 2004 Feb; 5(2):119–24.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tataryn M. Attitudes that don’t work: Women with disabilities and employment. Women and Environments International Magazine. 2005; 21–4.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dolgin MJ, Somer E, Buchvald E, Zaizov R. Quality of life in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Soc Work Health Care. 1999; 28(4):31–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feuerstein M, Luff GM, Harrington CB, Olsen CH. Patterns of workplace disputes in cancer survivors: A population study of ADA claims. J Cancer Surviv. 2007; 1:185–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Abrahamsen AF, Loge JH, Hannisdal E, Holte H, Kvaloy S. Socio-medical situation for long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease: a survey of 459 patients treated at one institution. Eur J Cancer. 1998 Nov; 34(12):1865–70.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fobair P, Hoppe RT, Bloom J, Cox R, Varghese A, Spiegel D. Psychosocial problems among survivors of Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol. 1986 May; 4(5):805–14.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Joly F, Henry-Amar M, Arveux P, Reman O, Tanguy A, Peny AM, et al. Late psychosocial sequelae in Hodgkin’s disease survivors: a French population-based case-control study. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Sep; 14(9):2444–53.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kornblith AB, Herndon JE, 2nd, Zuckerman E, Cella DF, Cherin E, Wolchok S, et al. Comparison of psychosocial adaptation of advanced stage Hodgkin's disease and acute leukemia survivors. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Ann Oncol. 1998 Mar; 9(3):297–306.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    van Tulder MW, Aaronson NK, Bruning PF. The quality of life of long-term survivors of Hodgkins disease. Ann Oncol. 1994 Feb; 5(2):153–8.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Clement-Jones V. Cancer and beyond: the formation of BACUP. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Oct 12; 291(6501):1021–3.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cancerbackup, CIPD, Working with Cancer (WwC) group. Cancer and working guidelines for employers, HR and line managers. [cited 2007 November 12]; Available from:
  43. 43.
    Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Working with cancer. [cited 2007 November 12]; Available from:
  44. 44.
    Olgod J, Engelbrekt P. When an Employee Develops Cancer: Danish Cancer Survivor 2002.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Breast Cancer Care. [cited 2002 December 8]; Available from:
  46. 46.
    The Cancer Care Council Australia. [cited 2007 December 8]; Available from:
  47. 47.
    The Cancer Council Australia. Working with Cancer: A Workplace Resource for Leaders, Managers, Trainers and Employees: NSW: The Cancer Council Australia 2007.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pransky G, Shaw W, McLellan R. Employer attitudes, training, and return-to-work outcomes: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2001; 13(2):131–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schur L, Kruse D, Blanck P. Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities. Behav Sci Law. 2005; 23(1):3–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hartmann U, Muche R, Reuss-Borst M. Effects of a step-by-step inpatient rehabilitation program on quality of life in breast cancer patients. A prospective randomized study. Onkologie. 2007 Apr; 30(4):177–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Assistant ProfessorRutgers University, School of Social WorkNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations