Advertisement

Introduction: The Emergence of Nanoparticles as Imaging Platform in Biomedicine

  • Jeff. W.M. Bulte
  • Michel M.J. Modo
Part of the Fundamental Biomedical Technologies book series (FBMT, volume 102)

Abstract

Nanoparticles have now emerged as widely used diagnostic agents in biomedicine. They possess unique features that can be exploited with imaging. Among these are an increased sensitivity in detection through amplification of signal changes; a manipulation of surface structures and enhancement of uptake by selected cells (macrophages); altered pharmacokinetics allowing, for instance, their use as blood pool imaging agents; and physicochemical manipulations of energy (i.e., quantum dots). Specific aspects of nanoparticles are introduced to illustrate their use in biomedical imaging.

Keywords

Contrast Agent Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Colloidal Gold Biomedical Imaging Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aime, S., Castelli, D.D., Terreno, E., 2005. Highly sensitive MRI chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using liposomes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44, 5513–5515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alivisatos, A.P., 1996. Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 271, 933–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashburn, W.L., Braunwald, E., Simon, A.L., Peterson, K.L., Gault, J.H., 1971. Myocardial perfusion imaging with radioactive-labeled particles injected directly into the coronary circulation of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 44, 851–865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulte, J.W., 2005. Hot spot MRI emerges from the background. Nat Biotechnol 23, 945–946.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, W.C.W., Nie, S.M., 1998. Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. Science 281, 2016–2018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fee, H.J., Robinson, D.S., Sample, W.F., Graham, L.S., Holmes, E.C., Morton, D.L., 1978. The determination of lymph shed by colloidal gold scanning in patients with malignant melanoma: a preliminary study. Surgery 84, 626–632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Havron, A., Seltzer, S.E., Davis, M.A., Shulkin, P., 1981. Radiopaque liposomes: a promising new contrast material for computed tomography of the spleen. Radiology 140, 507–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Horisberger, M., Rosset, J., 1977. Colloidal gold, a useful marker for transmission and scanning electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 25, 295–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mendonca Dias, M.H., Lauterbur, P.C., 1986. Ferromagnetic particles as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of liver and spleen. Magn Reson Med 3, 328–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan, J.R., Williams, K.E., Davies, R.L., Leach, K., Thomson, M., Williams, L.A., 1981. Localisation of experimental staphylococcal abscesses by 99MTC-technetiumlabelled liposomes. J Med Microbiol 14, 213–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ohgushi, M., Nagayama, K., Wada, A., 1978. Dextran-magnetite: new relaxation agent and its application to T2 measurements in gel. J Magn Reson 29, 599–601.Google Scholar
  12. Rabin, O., Manuel Perez, J., Grimm, J., Wojtkiewicz, G., Weissleder, R., 2006. An X-ray computed tomography imaging agent based on long-circulating bismuth sulphide nanoparticles. Nat Mater 5, 118–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Renshaw, P.F., Owen, C.S., Evans, A.E., Leigh, J.S., Jr., 1986a. Immunospecific NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Imag 4, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Renshaw, P.F., Owen, C.S., McLaughlin, A.C., Frey, T.G., Leigh, J.S., Jr., 1986b. Ferromagnetic contrast agents: a new approach. Magn Reson Med 3, 217-225.Google Scholar
  15. Rifkind, D.A., Hsu, K.C., Morgan, Seegal, B.C., Knox, A.W., Rose, H.M., 1960. Use of ferritin-conjugated antibody to localize antigen by electron microscopy. Nature 187, 1094-1095.Google Scholar
  16. Ryan, P.J., Davis, M.A., Melchior, D.L., 1983. The preparation and characterization of liposomes containing X-ray contrast agents. Biochim Biophys Acta 756, 106–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shapiro, E.M., Skrtic, S., Koretsky, A.P., 2005. Sizing it up: cellular MRI using micron-sized iron oxide particles. Magn Reson Med 53, 329–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singer, S.J., Schick, A.F., 1961. Properties of specific stains for electron microscopy prepared by conjugation of antibody molecules with ferritin. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9, 519–&.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Unger, E., Needleman, P., Cullis, P., Tilcock, C., 1988. Gadolinium-DTPA liposomes as a potential MRI contrast agent. Work in progress. Invest Radiol 23, 928–932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Widder, D.J., Simeone, J.F., 1986. Microbubbles as a contrast agent for neurosonography and ultrasound-guided catheter manipulation: in vitro studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147, 347–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff. W.M. Bulte
  • Michel M.J. Modo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations