Advertisement

Citizenship, Social Capital, and Spatial Assimilation of Highly Skilled Labor and Location Choice

  • Yiu Por Chen
Chapter
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 18)

Introduction

In this chapter, we explain the differences in the location choices of science and engineering (S&E) PhDs who are native born versus those who are naturalized American citizens. Specifically, we compare these two groups as to their likelihood of staying in a specific state. A comparison of these two groups is interesting in that they might be very different in their respective cultures and hence in their behavior in selecting locations in which to work and live. Further, the mobility pattern of these two groups is likely to affect the supply of human capital in certain U.S. locations and hence have a strong impact on the country’s educational and regional policies.

Naturalized American citizens can be described as first-generation U.S. immigrants, who are thereby not restricted by the conditions imposed by work visas such as H1-B. Hence, their patterns of assimilation in the United States have important economic implications. In contrast, H1-B visa holders are subject to...

Keywords

Social Capital Retention Rate Location Choice Spatial Assimilation West North Central 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alba RD, Nee V (2003) Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  2. Audretsch D, Stephan P (1996) Company – scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. Am Econ Rev 86: 641–652Google Scholar
  3. Beenstock M, Chiswick BR, Paltiel A (2005) Endogenous assimilation and immigrant adjustment in longitudinal data. IZA Discussion Papers 1840, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Google Scholar
  4. Borjas GJ (1984) The impact of assimilation on the earnings of immigrants: A reexamination of the evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 151Google Scholar
  5. Borjas GJ (2006) Making it in America: Social mobility in the immigrant population. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12088Google Scholar
  6. Chiswick BR (1977) Sons of immigrants: Are they at an earning disadvantage? Am Econ Rev 67: 376–380Google Scholar
  7. Chiswick BR (1978) The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. J Polit Econ 86: 897–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiswick BR (1999) Are Immigrants Favorably Self-Selected? Am Econ Rev 89: 181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiswick BR, Miller PW (2002) Immigrant earnings: Language skills, linguistic concentrations and the business cycle. J Popul Econ 15: 31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiswick BR, Lee YL, Miller PW (2002) The determinants of the geographic concentration among immigrants: Application to Australia. IZA Discussion Paper No. 462, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Google Scholar
  11. Chiswick BR, Lee YL, Miller PW (2006) Immigrants’ Language Skills and Visa Category. Int Migr Rev 40: 419–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helsley R, Strange W (1990) Matching and agglomeration in a system of cities. Reg Sci Urb Econ 20: 189–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koo J (2005) Knowledge based industry clusters: Evidenced by geographic patterns of patents in manufacturing. Urb Stud 42: 1457–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller PW, Chiswick BR (1996) Ethnic networks and language proficiency among immigrants. J Popul Econ 9: 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2001) 2001 Survey of doctorate recipients in the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  16. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2003) Characteristics of doctoral scientists and engineers in the United States: 2001. NSF 03-310Google Scholar
  17. Smeets V, Warzynski F, Coupé T (2006) Does the academic labor market initially allocate new graduates efficiently? J Econ Perspect 20: 161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephan PE, Sumell AJ, Black GC et al (2004) Doctoral education and economic development: The flow of new PhD’s to industry. Econ Devel Q 18: 151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiu Por Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public Service, DePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations