The Integrity of Narratives: Deliberative Practice, Pluralism, and Multivocality

  • Alison Wylie


Conceptual Integrity Deliberative Practice Empirical Adequacy Epistemic Standard Situate Interest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Doppelt, G. D. (1988). The philosophical requirements for an adequate conception of scientific rationality. Philosophy of Science, 55(1), 4–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doppelt, G. D. (1990). The naturalist conception of methodological standards in science: A critique. Philosophy of Science, 57, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Harding, S. (2006). Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hodder, I. (1997). Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71(273), 691–700.Google Scholar
  7. Hodder, I. (1999). The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Kojan, D., & Angelo, D. (2005). Dominant narratives, social violence and the practice of Bolivian archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 5(3), 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, values, and theory choice. In T.S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension (pp. 320–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4), 421–431.Google Scholar
  11. Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Longino, H. E. (1994). In search of feminist epistemology. The Monist, 77(4), 472–485.Google Scholar
  14. Longino, H. E. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell, S. D. (1992). On pluralism and competition in evolutionary explanations. American Zoologist, 32, 135–144.Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell, S. D. (2002). Integrative pluralism. Biology and Philosophy, 17, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagel, T. (1979). Subjective and objective. In T. Nagel, Mortal Questions (pp. 196–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, W. (2006). Understanding pluralism in climate modeling. Foundations of Science, 11, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, D. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, D. (1984). A peculiar eclipsing. In The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology (pp. 17–44). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Trigger, B. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man, 19, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trigger, B. G. (1989). Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 26(5), 776–797.Google Scholar
  23. Trouillot, M.-R. (1995). Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  24. Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wylie, A. (2003). Why standpoint matters. In R. Figueroa & S. Harding (Eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology (pp. 26–48). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Wylie, A. (2006). Moderate relativism/political objectivism. In R. F. Williamson & M. S. Bisson (Eds.), The Archaeology of Bruce Trigger: Theoretical Empiricism (pp. 25–35). Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wylie, A. (2007). “The feminism question in science: What does it mean to ‘do social science as a feminist’?” In S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research (pp. 567–578). New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison Wylie
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Philosophy and AnthropologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations