This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Doppelt, G. D. (1988). The philosophical requirements for an adequate conception of scientific rationality. Philosophy of Science, 55(1), 4–133.
Doppelt, G. D. (1990). The naturalist conception of methodological standards in science: A critique. Philosophy of Science, 57, 1–19.
Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Harding, S. (2006). Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. (1997). Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71(273), 691–700.
Hodder, I. (1999). The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Kojan, D., & Angelo, D. (2005). Dominant narratives, social violence and the practice of Bolivian archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 5(3), 383–408.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, values, and theory choice. In T.S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension (pp. 320–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4), 421–431.
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino, H. E. (1994). In search of feminist epistemology. The Monist, 77(4), 472–485.
Longino, H. E. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, S. D. (1992). On pluralism and competition in evolutionary explanations. American Zoologist, 32, 135–144.
Mitchell, S. D. (2002). Integrative pluralism. Biology and Philosophy, 17, 55–70.
Nagel, T. (1979). Subjective and objective. In T. Nagel, Mortal Questions (pp. 196–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, W. (2006). Understanding pluralism in climate modeling. Foundations of Science, 11, 349–368.
Smith, D. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13.
Smith, D. (1984). A peculiar eclipsing. In The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology (pp. 17–44). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Trigger, B. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man, 19, 355–370.
Trigger, B. G. (1989). Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 26(5), 776–797.
Trouillot, M.-R. (1995). Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon.
Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wylie, A. (2003). Why standpoint matters. In R. Figueroa & S. Harding (Eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology (pp. 26–48). New York: Routledge.
Wylie, A. (2006). Moderate relativism/political objectivism. In R. F. Williamson & M. S. Bisson (Eds.), The Archaeology of Bruce Trigger: Theoretical Empiricism (pp. 25–35). Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Wylie, A. (2007). “The feminism question in science: What does it mean to ‘do social science as a feminist’?” In S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research (pp. 567–578). New York: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wylie, A. (2008). The Integrity of Narratives: Deliberative Practice, Pluralism, and Multivocality. In: Habu, J., Fawcett, C., Matsunaga, J.M. (eds) Evaluating Multiple Narratives. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71824-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71825-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)