Advertisement

Fisheries worldwide are subject to economic mismanagement of major proportions. Although most commercial fish stocks are capable of yielding high net profits (rents), only a relatively few fisheries are actually profitable. Rough estimates suggest that on a global scale, the loss of net economic benefits due to mismanagement of fisheries may easily amount to 50% or more of the global landed value of some 100 billion US$ annually. The fisheries problem derives fundamentally from inappropriate social institutions controlling the fishing activity, the foremost of which is the common property arrangement. Fisheries management consists of replacing these institutions with more appropriate ones and, within that framework, setting the correct parameters over time. Global evidence suggests that the cost of fisheries management often constitutes a substantial fraction of the value of the harvest. A part of the fisheries management problem, therefore, is to strike the right balance between the efficacy of the fisheries management regime and the cost of operating it.

Keywords

Fishery Management Fish Stock Fishing Effort Maximum Sustainable Yield Quota Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afriat, S. 1967. The construction of a utility function from expenditure data. International Economic Review 8:67-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L. G. and Ben-Isreal. 1981. Modelling and simulation of independent fisheries: An optimal effort allocation using mathermatical programming. In K.B. Haley (ed.) Applied Operations Research in Fisheries.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 2001. The Significance of Economic Incentives in Fisheries Management under the CFP. Fodevareokonomisk Institut, rapport n. 127. Statens Jordbrugs - og Fiskeriokonomiske Institut. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  4. Arnason, R. 1990. Minimum Information Management in Fisheries. Canadian Journal of Economics 23:630-653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnason, R. 1998. Ecological fisheries management using individual transferable share quotas. Ecological Applications 8(1) Supplement:151-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnason, R. 2000. Economic instruments to achieve ecosystem objectives in fisheries manage-ment. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57(3):742-751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnason, R. 2003. Fisheries management costs: some theoretical implications. In: W.E. Schrank, R. Arnason, R. Hannesson (eds.) The Cost of Fisheries Management. Ashgate Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Arnason, R., R. Hannesson, and W.E. Schrank. 2000. Costs of fisheries management: the cases of Iceland, Norway and Newfoundland. Marine Policy 24:233-243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnason, R., Magnusson, G., and Agnarsson, S., 2000. Herring Fishery Games. Marine Resource Economics 15(4):293-319.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, G.S. 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76:169-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BEMMFISH. 2004. Final Report. Bio-Economic Modelling of Mediterranean Fisheries. EU Research Program. Q5RS-2001-01533.Google Scholar
  12. Bjorndal, T., D. Lane, and A. Weintraub. 2004. Operational research models and the management of fisheries and aquaculture: a review. European Journal of operations Research 156:533-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bjorndal, T. and A.D. Scott. 1988. Does the Prisoners’ Dilemma Apply to a Fishery. Institute of Fisheries Economics. Discussion paper series 5/1988. Norwegian School of Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Charles, A.T. 2001. Sustainable Fishery Systems. Fish and Aquatic Resources Series 5. Blackwell Science. Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Coase, R.H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:1-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coello, C. 1999. A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimisation techniques. Knowledge and Information Systems. An International Journal 1:269-308.Google Scholar
  17. Criddle, K.R. and A.Y. Streletski. 2000. Multiple criterion management of a sequential fishery. Annals of Operations Research 94:259-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO. 2004. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2004. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon, H.S. 1954. Economic theory of a common property resource: The fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62:124-142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hannesson, R. 1996. Fisheries Mismanagement: The Case of the North Atlantic Cod. Fishing News Books. Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IREPA. 2003. Fishery Regulation and the Economic Responses of Fishermen: Perceptions and Compliance. Final Report. European Union Fifth Framework Programme: Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources. Project QLK5-CT1999-01405. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  23. Kalyanmoy D. 2001. Nonlinear goal programming using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52:291-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milazzo, M. 1998. Subsidies in World Fisheries: A Re-examination. World Bank Technical Papers no. 406. Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Panayoutou, T. 1984. Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Report No 289, suppl. 2. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome. Rodrigues, G. (ed.). 1990. Operations Research in Fisheries and Fisheries Management. Kluwer. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  26. Schrank, W.E., R. Arnason, and R. Hannesson. 2003. The Cost of Fisheries Management. Ashgate Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Scott, A.D.1955. The fishery: The objectives of sole ownership. Journal of Political Economy 63:727-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shotton, R. (ed.). 2000. Use of property rights in fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 401/1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome.Google Scholar
  29. Mardle, S., S. Pascoe, and M. Tamiz. 2000. An investigation of genetic algorithms for the optimization of multi-objective fisheries bioeconomic models. International Transactions of Operations Research 7:33-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Varian, H. 1982. The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50:945-973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Varian, H. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. 3rd ed. W.W. Norton & Company. New York.Google Scholar
  32. Wallace, S.W. and S. Ólafsson (ed.). 1994. The Nordic fisheries management model: description and experience. Nord 1994:4. Nordic Council of Ministers, Denmark.Google Scholar
  33. Wallis, P. and O. Flaaten. 2003. Fisheries management costs: Concepts and studies. In W.E. Schrank, R. Arnason, R. Hannesson (eds.). The Cost of Fisheries Management. Ashgate Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ragnar Arnason
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of IcelandIceland

Personalised recommendations