Advertisement

Environmental Criteria in Pig Diet Formulation with Multi-Objective Fractional Programming

  • Teresa Peña
  • Carmen Castrodeza
  • Pablo Lara
Part of the International Series In Operations Research amp; Mana book series (ISOR, volume 99)

The objective of this chapter is to show how the techniques of Multi-objective Fractional Programming (MFP) can enhance the process of animal diet formulation. We propose a model with three objectives and explain how animal diet formulation can be tackled using the method of Interactive Multiple Goal Programming (IMGP). This method allows us to treat the presence of fractional objectives, simplifying the problem from a computational point of view.

Keywords

Decision Maker Soybean Meal Fish Meal Linear Programming Model Environmental Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agricultural Research Council (ARC), 1981, The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs, Common-wealth Agricultural Bureau, Slough.Google Scholar
  2. Castrodeza, C., Lara, P. and Peña, T., 2005, Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: economic, nutritional and environmental criteria, Agric. Syst., 86: 76-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W., 1962, Programming with linear fractionals functionals, Naval Res. Log. Quart., 9: 181-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole, D.J.A. and Van Lunen, T.A., 1994, Ideal amino acid patterns, in: Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition, J.D.F. D’Mello, ed., CAB International, UK, pp. 99-112.Google Scholar
  5. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal (FEDNA), 1999, Normas FEDNA para la Formulación de Piensos Compuestos, FEDNA, Madrid.Google Scholar
  6. Jean dit Bailleul, P., Rivest, J., Dubeeu, F. and Pomar, C., 2001, Reducing nitrogen excretion in pigs by modifying the traditional least-cost formulation algorithm, Livest. Prod. Sci., 72: 199-211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lara, P., 1993, Multiple objective fractional programming and livestock ration formulation: a case study for dairy cow diets in Spain, Agric. Syst., 41: 321-334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. National Research Council (NRC), 1998, Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th ed., National Academic Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  9. Rehman,T. and Romero, C., 1984, Multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and their role in livestock ration formulation, Agric. Syst., 15(1): 23-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Romero, C. and Rehman, T., 2003, Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Rotz, C.A., 2004, Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production, J. Anim. Sci., 82(E. Suppl.): E119-E137.Google Scholar
  12. Schaible, S., 1976, Fractional programming I. Duality, Manage. Sci., 22: 858-867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Spronk, J., 1981, Interactive Multiple Goal Programming: Applications to Financial Planning, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Stancu-Minasian, I., 1997, Fractional Programming: Theory, Methods and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Tozer, P.R. and Stokes, J.R., 2001, A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management, Agric. Syst., 67: 201-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Lunen, T.A. and Cole, D.J.A., 1996, The effect of lysine/digestible energy ratio on growth performance and nitrogen deposition on hybrid boards, gilts and castrated male pigs, Anim. Sci., 63: 1575-1583.Google Scholar
  17. Van der Werf, H.M.G., Petit, J. and Sanders, J., 2005, The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne, Agric. Syst., 83: 153-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Peña
    • 1
  • Carmen Castrodeza
    • 1
  • Pablo Lara
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Economics (Mathematics), Facutly of EconomicsUniversity of ValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Department of Animal Production, ETSIAMUniversity of CórdobaSpain

Personalised recommendations