Tactical-Level Forest Management Models
Tactical analysis represents a bridge between strategic modeling and operations modeling. Whereas strategic models represent space with large tracks and production areas, operational models represent a space as a set of stands, riparian zones, feasible positions for road segments, and the terrain surface so that logging activities can be laid out. Strategic models allow a broad-scale analysis over a long horizon to optimize forest-level outputs and costs. Operational- level models make location-specific decisions over a much smaller time frame. The task of a tactical-level model is to bridge the disconnect that exists between the strategic domain and the operational domain.
KeywordsRoad Segment Planning Unit Strategic Level Road Building Timing Choice
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andleman, S.J., Ball, I., Davis, F.W., and Stoms, D.M., 1999, SITES V: an analytical toolbox for designing ecoregional conservation portfolios, Manual prepared for the Nature Conservancy: 1–43.Google Scholar
- Bare, B.B. and Field, R., 1987, An evaluation of FORPLAN from an operations research perspective, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-140, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
- Carroll, B., Landrum, V., and Pious, L., 1995, Timber harvest scheduling with adjacency constraints: using ARC/INFO to make Forplan realistic, in 1995 ESRI User Conference Proceedings, Redlands, California, USA (http://www.esri.com/base/common/userconf/proc95/prochome.html).
- Church, R. and Barber, K., 1992, Disaggregating forest management plans to treatment areas, Stand Inventory Technologies 92: 287–295.Google Scholar
- Church, R., Murray, A., and Barber, K., 1994, Designing a hierarchical planning model for USDA Forest Service planning, in Proceedings of the 1994 Symposium on Systems Analysis and Forest Resources: 401–409.Google Scholar
- Church, R.L., 2001, GIS and large-scale linear programming: evolution of a spatial decision support system for land use management, in Regional Science and Business. Clarke G. and Madden M. (eds.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Davis, F.W., Stoms, D.M., Church, R.L., Okin, W.J., and Johnson, K.N., 1996, Selecting Biodiversity Management Areas, in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress Vol. 2, University of California at Davis.Google Scholar
- Epstein, R., Weintraub, A., Sapunar, P., Nieto, E., Sessions, J., and Sessions, B., 1995, PLANEX: a system for optimal assignment of harvesting, in Proceedings Harvest Planning Conference. LIRO, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- Fischer, D. and Church, R.L., 2003, Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the Biodiversity Management Area Selection Model, Forest Science 49: 1–11.Google Scholar
- Hof, J.G. and Pickens, J.B., 1987, A pragmatic multilevel approach to large-scale renewable resource optimization: a test case, Natural Resource Modeling 1: 245–264.Google Scholar
- Johnson, K.N. and Stuart, T., 1987, FORPLAN Version 2: Mathematical Programmer’s Guide, Land Management Planning Systems Section, U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Johnson, K.N., Stuart, T., and Crimm, S.A., 1986, FORPLAN Version 2: An Overview, Land Management Planning Systems Section, U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- McDill, M.E., Rabin, S.A., and Braze, J. 2002, Harvest scheduling with area-based adjacency constraints, Forest Science 48: 631–642.Google Scholar
- Nalle, D.J., Arthur, J.L., and Sessions, J., 2002, Designing compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm, Forest Science 48: 59–68.Google Scholar
- Navon, D., 1971, Timber AM…A Long Range Planning Method for Commercial Timber Lands under Multiple Use Management. Research paper PSW-70. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
- Nelson, J., Brodie, J.D., and Sessions, J., 1991, Integrating short-term, area-based logging plans with long-term harvest schedules, Forest Science 37: 101–122.Google Scholar
- Sleavin, K.E. and Camenson, D., 1994, Spectrum, Proceedings of the 1994 Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Pacific Grove, Ca, September.Google Scholar
- Weintraub, A. and Cholaky, A., 1991, A hierarchical approach to forest planning, Forest Science 37: 439–460.Google Scholar