Advertisement

Models for Strategic Forest Management

  • Eldon A. Gunn
Part of the International Series In Operations Research amp; Mana book series (ISOR, volume 99)

Strategic forest-management models are models that assist strategic decision makers in examining forest strategy. There is history of long-term linear programming and related models being seen as strategic. However, strategy is broader than just the forest-management process. As a result, a large number of ecological and economic models may also inform the forest-management process. As we change our perspective on what strategic issues are important, this may require us to think about both the formulation and use of the strategic models.

Keywords

Forest Management Forest Product Linear Programming Model Strategic Model Site Capability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, D. M. 2002. RPA5: Harvest, inventory and stumpage prices. Journal of Forestry 100(2):26–31.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D. M. and Haynes, R.W. 1980. The 1980 softwood timber assessment market model; structure, projections, and policy simulations. Monograph 22. Supplement to Forest Science 26(3):64.Google Scholar
  3. Alila, Y. and Beckers, J. 2001. Using numerical modelling to address hydrologic forest management issues in British Columbia. Hydrological Processes 15:3371–3387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anthony, R.N. 1965. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. Boston. MA.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K., Daily, G.C., Dasgupta, P., Levin, S., Maler, K-G, Maskin, E., Starrett, D., Sterner, T., and Tietenberg, T. 2000. Managing ecosystem resources. Environmental Science and Technology 34:1401–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barros O. and Weintraub A. 1982. Planning for vertically integrated forest industries. Operations Research 30(5):1168–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettinger, P. and Lennette, M. 2004. Landscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS), Version 1.1. USER GUIDE. Research Contribution 43, Forest Research Laboratory. Oregon State University. Corvallis. OR.Google Scholar
  8. Boychuk, D. and Martell, D. L. 1996. A multistage stochastic programming model for sustainable forest-level timber supply under risk of fire. Forest Science 42:10–26.Google Scholar
  9. Buongiorno, J. 2001. Generalization of Faustmann's formula for stochastic forest growth and prices with Markov decision process models. Forest Science 47:466–474.Google Scholar
  10. Buongiorno, J. and Gilless, J. K. 1984. A model of international trade of forest products, with an application to newsprint. Journal of World Forest Resource Management 1:65–80.Google Scholar
  11. Buongiorno, J., Zhu, S., Zhang, D., and Tomberlin, D. 2003. The Global Forest Products Model. Academic Press. UK. p. 301.Google Scholar
  12. Church, R. L., Murray, A. T., and Barber, K. H. 2000. Forest planning at the tactical level. Annals of Operations Research 95:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Church, R. and Daugherty, P. J. 1999. Considering intergenerational equity in linear programming-based forest planning models with MAXMIN objective functions. Forest Science 45:366–373.Google Scholar
  14. Dantzig, G. B.1963. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press. Princeton. NJ. p. 627.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, L. S., Johnson, K. N., Bettinger, P. S., and Howard, T. E. 2001. Forest Management. Fourth edition. McGraw-Hill. New York. p. 804.Google Scholar
  16. Daugherty, P. J. 1991. Credibility of Long Term Forest Planning: Dynamic Inconsistency in Linear Programming Based Forest Planning Models. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept of Env. Sci. Policy and Management. University of California. Berkeley. p. 158.Google Scholar
  17. Deutschman, D. H., Levin, S. A., Devine, C., and Buttel, L. A. 1997. Scaling from trees to forests: analysis of a complex simulation model. Science Online. Last viewed Mar. 2005 at URL: http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/deutschman/index.htm.
  18. Garcia, O. 1984. FOLPI, a forestry-oriented linear programming interpreter. In: H. Nagumo et al. (eds.) Proceedings IUFRO Symposium on Forest Management Planning and Managerial Economics. University of Tokyo. Japan. pp. 293–305.Google Scholar
  19. Garcia, O. 1990. Linear programming and related approaches in forest planning. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 20:307–331. (a more detailed version is found at http://web.unbc.ca/∼garcia/unpub/unpub.htm, viewed Nov. 24, 2004).
  20. Gilless, J. K. and Buongiorno, J. 1987. PAPYRUS: A Model of the North American Pulp and Paper Industry. Forest Science Monograph 28. p. 37.Google Scholar
  21. Greber, B. J. and Johnson, K. N. 1991. What's all this debate about overcutting? Journal of Forestry 89(11):25–30.Google Scholar
  22. Greer, K. and Meneghin, B. 2000. SPECTRUM: an analytical tool for building natural resource management models, In: J. Fried, M. Vasiewvich, and L. Leefers (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources, May 28–31, 1997. Shanty Creek Resort, Bellaire, Michigan USDA North Central Research Station General Tech. Rep. NC-205, pp. 376–384.Google Scholar
  23. Gunn, E. A. 1991. Some aspects of hierarchical planning in forest management. In: Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Compiled by M. A. Buford. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-74. pp. 54–62.Google Scholar
  24. Gunn, E. A. 2004. Sustainable forest management: control, adaptive management, hierarchical planning. In: M. Bevers, T. M. Barrett (eds.) tech. comps. Systems Analysis In Forest Resources: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-656. USDA, Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station. pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
  25. Portland, OR. Gunn, E. A. and Rai, A. K. 1987. Modelling and decomposition for planning long-term forest harvesting in an integrated industry structure. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17:1507–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gustafson, E. J. and Rasmussen, L. V. 2002. HARVEST for Windows, Timber Harvest Simulation Model Version 6.0 User's Guide. North Central Research Station. Rhinelander. WI 54501.Google Scholar
  27. Gustafson, E. J., Shifley, S. R., Mladenoff, D. J., Nimerfro, K. K., and He, H. S. 2000. Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. He, H. S., Mladenoff, D. J., and Crow, T. R. 1999. Linking an ecosystem model and a landscape model to study forest species response to climate warming. Ecological Modelling 114:213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hellig, F. and Linddal, M. 1997. Early Danish contributions to forest economics. Journal of Forest Economics 3(1):87–103.Google Scholar
  30. Hof, J. G. and Bevers, M. 2002. Spatial Optimization in Ecological Applications. Columbia University Press. New York.Google Scholar
  31. Hoganson, H. M. and Rose, D. W. 1984. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. Forest Science 30(1):220–238.Google Scholar
  32. Holsapple, C. W. and Whinston, A. B. 2000. Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-based Approach. West Publishing Company. Minneapolis/St Paul. p. 713.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, K. N. and Jones, D. B. 1979. A User's Guide to Multiple Use—Sustained Yield Resource Scheduling Calculation (MUSYC). Land Management Planning System Section. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins. CO.Google Scholar
  34. Kallio, A. M. I., Moiseyev, A., and Solberg, B. 2004. The Global Forest Sector Model EFI-GTM— the Model Structure. European Forest Institute Internal Report No. 15.Google Scholar
  35. Kent, B., Bare, B. B., Field, R., and Bradley, G. 1991. Natural resource land management planning using large-scale linear programs: the USDA forest service experience with FORPLAN. Operations Research 39(1):13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kimmins, J. P., Mailly, D., and Seely, B. 1999. Modelling forest ecosystem net primary production: the hybrid simulation approach used in FORECAST. Ecological modelling 122:195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koskela, E. and Ollikainen, M. 2001. Optimal private and public harvesting under spatial and temporal interdependence. Forest Science 47(4):484–496.Google Scholar
  38. Lappi, J. 1992. JLP: A Linear Programming System for Management Planning. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research Papers 414. p. 134.Google Scholar
  39. Larocque, G. R. 1999. Editorial. Ecological Modelling 122:135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lebow, P. K., Spelter, H., and Ince, P. J. 2003. FPL-PELPS, A Price Endogenous Linear Programing System for Economic Modelling; Supplement to PELPS III, V 1.1. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper FPL-RP-614. Madison. WI. p. 32.Google Scholar
  41. Martell, D., Gunn, E., and Weintraub, A. 1998. Forest management challenges for operational researchers. European Journal of Operations Research 104(1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mladenoff, D. J. 2004. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological Modelling 180: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mladenoff, D. J., Baker, W. L. (eds.) 1999. Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. UK. p. 364.Google Scholar
  44. Mintzberg, H. 1989. Mintzberg on Management: Inside our Strange World of Organizations. Free Press. New York.Google Scholar
  45. Mintzberg, H. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners. Free Press. New York.Google Scholar
  46. Montreal Process Working Group. 2004. The Montréal Process site. http://www.mpci.org/home_e.html last viewed Nov. 22, 2004.
  47. Navon, D. I. 1971. Timber RAM - a long-range planning method for commercial timber lands under multiple-use management. USDA Forest Service. Research Paper PNW-70. Albany, CA: Pacific Southeast Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. p. 30.Google Scholar
  48. Nelson, J. 2003. Forest-level models and challenges for their successful application. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paredes, G. L. and Brodie, J. D. 1989. Land values and the linkage between stand and forest analysis. Land Economics 65(2):158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rauscher, H. M. 1999. Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 114:173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reed, W. J. and Errico, D. 1986. Optimal harvest scheduling at the forest level in the presence of the risk of fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16:266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rempel, R. S. and Kushneriuk, R. S. 2003. The influence of sampling scheme and interpolation method on the power to detect spatial effects of forest birds in Ontario (Canada). Landscape Ecology 18:741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Samuelson, P. 1952. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. The American economic review 42:283–303.Google Scholar
  54. Samuelson, P. 1976. The economics of forestry in an evolving society. Economic Enquiry 14:466–492. (also Journal of Forest Economics 1(1):115–149).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Siitonen, M., Anola-Pukkila, A., Haara, A., Harkonen, K., Redsven, V., Salminen, O., and Suokas, A. (eds.) 2001. MELA Handbook 2000 Edition. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. Helsinki. Finland. p. 498.Google Scholar
  56. Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., and Peterson, R. 1998. Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. Wiley. New York. p. 754.Google Scholar
  57. Sohngen, B. and Sedjo, R. 1998. A comparison of timber market models: static simulation and optimal control approaches. Forest Science 44:24–36.Google Scholar
  58. Takayama, T. and Judge, G. G.. 1971 Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. North Holland. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  59. Urban, D. L. 1990. A Versatile Model to Simulate Forest Pattern: A User's Guide to ZELIG Version 1.0. University of Virginia. Environmental Sciences Department. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
  60. Urban, D. L., Miller, C., Halpin, P. N., and Stephenson, N. L. 2000. Forest gradient response in Sierran landscapes: the physical template. Landscape Ecology 15:603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Urban, D. L., Acevedo, M. F., and Garman, S.L. 1999. Scaling fine-scale processes to large-scale patterns using models derived from models: meta-models. In: D. J. Mladenoff and W. L. Baker (eds.). Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
  62. Ware, G. O. and Clutter, J. L. 1971. A mathematical programming system for the management of industrial forests. Forest Science 17:428–445.Google Scholar
  63. Weintraub, A. and Bare, B. 1996. New issues in forest management from an operations research perspectives. Interfaces 26(5):9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang, D. 2001. Faustmann in an uncertain policy environment. Forest Policy and Economics 2:203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eldon A. Gunn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations