Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planning in Fisheries-Related Systems

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook Of Operations Research In Natural Resources

Part of the book series: International Series In Operations Research amp; Mana ((ISOR,volume 99))

In this chapter, models for decision support in fisheries related systems are presented involving problems with many varied and often conflicting criteria. The fisheries systems problems and decision support opportunities include: (i) spatial-temporal decisions on the exploitation and use of marine zones defined by geographic information systems (GIS) to evaluate diverse activities such as traditional fisheries, aquaculture, and recreation; (ii) longer-term strategic evaluation of fisheries policy and planning exercises; (iii) operational assessment of stock status leading to commercial exploitation regulations, and (iv) deciding on the scientific activities for fisheries science research as a function of prespecified mandates. In each of these cases, the commercial fishery and coastal zone systems require the consideration of multiple criteria characterised by the conflicting issues of sustaining and conserving the marine ecosystem while carrying out exploitation on marine species for commercial and socioeconomic supporting enhancements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W. and Pardey, P.G. 1995. Science under scarcity. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aouni, B. 2004. Goal programming model: Theory and applications (Part I). Special Issue of INFOR. 42(3), August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P.C. 1991. Visual interactive modelling: the past, the present, and the prospects. Mini-Euro Conference on Visual Interactive Modelling, Warwick, 1988. European Journal of Operational Research 54, 307-317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton, V. and Vickers, S.P. 1989. V.I.S.A. - VIM for MCDA. In Lockett, A.G. and Islei, G. (eds.) Improving Decision Making in Organisations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 287-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodily, S.E. (ed.) 1992. Decision and risk analysis. Special Issue of Interfaces. 22(6), 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. 2004. Multicriteria Approach for Risk-based Science Prioritisation. M.Sc. Thesis. Master's Program in Systems Science, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J.L. and Zeleny, M. (eds.) 1973. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFO. 2002. Haddock on the Southern Scotian Shelf and Bay of Fundy (Div. 4X/5Y). DFO Sci. Stock Status Report. A3-07(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • DFO. 2003. Financial stability, program renewal and modern management. The DAAP Final Report. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFO. 2004. A Policy Framework for the Management of Fisheries on Canada's Atlantic Coast. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Ottawa, March 46p.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo, G., D. Levy, and B. Golden. 1989. Using decision analysis to manage Maryland's river Herring fishery: An application of AHP. Journal of Environmental Management 29: 193-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehtamo, H. and Hamalainen, R. 1995. Credibility of linear equilibrium strategies in a discrete time fishery management game. Group Decisions and Negotiation 4, 27-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, M. 1992. Visual Interactive Modelling: Some Guidelines for its Implementation and Some Aspects of its Potential Impact on Operational Research. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Strathclyde, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expert Choice. 2005. Expert Choice 2000. http://www.expertchoice.com/software/.

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, R.G., Fanning P.F. and Mohn, R.K. 2001. Use of the Traffic Light Method in Fishery Management Planning. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2001/108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J.S., Keeny, R.L. and Raiffa, H. 2002. Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Life Decisions. Broadway Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Lecture notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFORS. 2005. International Federation of Operational Research Triennial 2005 Conference. http://www.ifors.org/

  • ISNAR. 2001. Information and Discussion Forum on Priority Setting in Agricultural Research. http://www.isnar.cgiar.org/fora/index2.htm

  • Kangas, J. 1995. Supporting the choice of the sports fishing site. Journal of Environmental Management 43: 219-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeny, R.L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeny, R.L. and Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G. and Michalowski, W. (eds.) 1992. Special Issue on Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. INFOR 30(2), 65-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B. 1993. Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. Hyperion, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.E. 2001. Fisheries Management Science: Toward the Development of Decision Support for Multicriteria Systems in Conflicts. School of Management, University of Ottawa. PRISM Working Paper 01-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.E. 2003. Multicriteria Procedures for Science Program Prioritization at Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. School of Management, University of Ottawa Working paper No.04-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.E. and Stephenson, R.L. 1998. Toward a framework for risk analysis in fisheries decision making. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55(1), 1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.E. and Stephenson, R.L. 2000. Institutional Arrangements for Fisheries: Alternate Structures and Impediments to Change. Marine Policy 24, 385-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, P., J. Muraoka, S.T. Nakamoto, and S. Pooley. 1998. Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Fisheries Research 36(2-3): 171-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardle, S., Pascoe, S. and Herrero, I. 2004. Management objective importance in fisheries: An evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Environmental Management 33 (1): 1-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, M.F. and K.R. Criddle. 1993. Evaluation of the analytic hierarchy process for aiding management decisions in recreational fisheries: a case study of the Chinook salmon fishery in the Kenai River, Alaska. In G. Kruse, D.M. Eggers, R.J. Marasco, C. Pautzke and T.J. Quinn II (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Management Strategies for Exploited Fish Populations, 93-02, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 683-703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen K. and Mäkelä M.M. 2000. Interactive multiobjective optimization system WWW-NIMBUS on the Internet. Computers and Operations Research, 27, 709-723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD 2000. Transition to Responsible Fisheries: Economic and Policy Implications, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. 1985. Methodologie Multicritere d’Aide a la Decision. Economica. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa, M. 1993. Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multiobjective Optimization. Plenum Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Soma, K. 2003. How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management - a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago. Marine Policy 27(1): 47-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M.K. and Zeleny, M. (eds.) 1977. Multiple criteria decision making. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 6. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, R.L., Lane, D.E., Aldous, D.G., and Nowak, R. 1993. Management of the 4WX Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus) Fishery: An Evaluation of Recent Events. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:2742-2757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E. 1986. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spronk, J. and Zionts, S. 1984. Special Issue on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Management Science. 30 (November), 1265-1387. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M. 2003. CROSS: A multicriteria group-decision-making model for evaluating and prioritizing advanced-technology projects at NASA. Interfaces 33(3): 40-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, C.T., Chen, S.C., Huang, C.S., and Liu, C.C. 2001. GIS-assisted site selection for artificial reefs. Fisheries Science 67(6): 1015-1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantophyllou, E. 2000. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodologies: A Comparative Study. Applied Optimization, 44. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, G.(1988). The development and utility of sequential population analysis in stock assessments in Collected Papers on Stock Assessment Methods. In D. Rivard (ed.), Canadian Atlantic Fisheries Scientific Advisory Committee Res Doc. 88/61, 349-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooster, W.S. (ed.) 1988. Fishery Science and Management: Objectives and Limitations. Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Vol 28. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, L. 2003. Decision Support Integrated System for Multicriteria Policy Evaluation for Fisheries Management. M.Sc. Thesis. Master's Program in Systems Science, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Ottawa, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, L. and Lane, D.E. 2004. Evaluation of Strategic Policies for Fisheries Systems. Paper submitted to the Proceedings of the 4th World Fisheries Congress, Vancouver, B.C., June. 25p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and Zhang, D. 1992. Multicriteria optimization. In Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial Engineering, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 2672-2692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. 2004. Integrated Systems Analysis for Coastal Aquaculture. M.Sc. Thesis. Master's Program in Systems Science, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Ottawa. 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Lane, D.E., Michalowski, W., Stephenson, R.L. and Page, F. 2004. Integrated Systems Analysis for Coastal Aquaculture. Paper submitted to the Proceedings of the 4th World Fisheries Congress, Vancouver, B.C., June. 26p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

    Daniel E. Lane

Authors
  1. Daniel E. Lane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Andres Weintraub

  2. Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Carlos Romero

  3. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

    Trond Bjørndal

  4. University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Rafael Epstein

  5. Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile

    Jaime Miranda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lane, D.E. (2007). Planning in Fisheries-Related Systems. In: Weintraub, A., Romero, C., Bjørndal, T., Epstein, R., Miranda, J. (eds) Handbook Of Operations Research In Natural Resources. International Series In Operations Research amp; Mana, vol 99. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71815-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation