Skip to main content

Game Theoretic Applications to Fisheries

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Series In Operations Research amp; Mana ((ISOR,volume 99))

This chapter reviews non-cooperative and cooperative game theoretic models applied to the economics and management of multi-agent fisheries. We first compare two-player static and dynamic non-cooperative games, and then multiplayer non-cooperative and cooperative coalition games. In both comparisons we will make use of same type of models in order to facilitate the comparison of analyses and conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnason, R., G. Magnusson, and S. Agnarsson (2000), The Norwegian Spring-Spawning Herring Fishery: A Stylized Game Model, Marine Resource Economics 15, 293-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasão, A., C. C. Duarte, and M. A. Cunha-e-Sá (2000), Managing the Northern Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries: The stability of the UN Fish Stock Agreement Solution, Marine Resource Economics 15(4): 341-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1980), Restricted access to common-property fishery resources: A game-theoretic analysis, in Dynamic Optimisation and Mathematical Economics, Liu, Pan-Tai (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 117-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. and L. Mirman (1992), Strategic dynamic interaction, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16, 267-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. and L. Mirman (1996), The complete fish wars: Biological and dynamic interactions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 34-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannesson, R. (1997), ‘Fishing as a Supergame’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32, 309-322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V. (1993), Equilibria in a stochastic resource management game under imperfect information, European Journal of Operations Research 71,439-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V. and M. Lindroos (1998), Sharing the Benefits of Cooperation in High Seas Fishery Game: A Characteristic Function Game Approach, Natural Resource Modeling 11, 275-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V. and M. Lindroos (2004), When to sign an environmental agreement: The case of high sea fisheries, International Game Theory Review 6, 55-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V. and G. Munro (1995), The economic management of high sea fishery resources: Some game theoretic aspects, in Control and Game-Theoretic Models of the Environment, Carraro, Carlo and Filar, Jerzy A. (eds.), Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, Vol. 2, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 299-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V. and M. Pohjola (1988), Optimal recovery of a shared resource stock: A differential game model with efficient memory equilibria, Natural Resource Modeling 3, 91-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. (2003), Scope for efficient exploitation of North-East Atlantic Mackerel, Marine Resource Economics 18, 55-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronbak, L. and M. Lindroos (2003), An enforcement-coalition model: Fishermen and authorities forming coalitions, Environmental and Resource Economics 35, 169-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronbak, L. and M. Lindroos (2005), Sharing rules and stability in coalition games with externalities: The case of the Baltic Sea cod fishery. Department of Economics and Management discussion paper no. 7. University of Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, M. (2003), Cooperative and non-cooperative harvesting in a stochastic sequential fishery, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45, 454-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levhari, D. and L. Mirman (1980), The Great Fish War: An example using a dynamic Cournot-Nash solution, Bell Journal of Economics 11, 322-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, M. (2002), Coalitions in Fisheries, Helsinki School of Economics Working Papers W-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, M. (2004), Restricted coalitions in the management of regional fisheries organizations. Natural resource modeling 17, 45-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, M. and V. Kaitala (2000), Nash equilibria in a coalition game of the Norwegian spring-spawning herring fishery. Marine Resource Economics 15, 321-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, M., L. Kronbak, L., and V. Kaitala (2007), Coalitions in fisheries games, in Advances in Fisheries Economics: Festschrift in Honour of Professor Gordon Munro, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R., L. Sandal, and S. Steinshamn (2002), Fish wars on the high seas: A straddling stock competition model, International Game Theory Review 4, 53-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons, M. (1993), Game-Theoretic Resource Modeling, Natural ResourceModeling 7, 93-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, G. (1979), The optimal management of transboundary renewable resources, Canadian Journal of Economics 12, 355-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham Do, K. and H. Folmer (2003), International fisheries agreements: The feasibility and impacts of partial cooperation, CentER DP 2003-52, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintassilgo, P. (2003), A coalition approach to the management of high seas fisheries in the presence of externalities, Natural Resource Modeling 16, 175-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintassilgo, P. and C. C. Duarte (2000), The new-member problem in the cooperative management of high seas fisheries, Marine Resource Economics 15(4), 361-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. and G. Ruseski (2001), Effort subsidies and entry deterrence in transboundary fisheries. Natural Resource Modeling 14(3), 369-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruseski, G. (1998), International fish wars: The strategic roles for fleet licensing and effort subsidies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 70-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, Lloyd (1953), ‘A Value for n-person Games’, in The Shapley value - Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley, A. Roth (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaitala, V., Lindroos, M. (2007). Game Theoretic Applications to Fisheries. In: Weintraub, A., Romero, C., Bjørndal, T., Epstein, R., Miranda, J. (eds) Handbook Of Operations Research In Natural Resources. International Series In Operations Research amp; Mana, vol 99. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71815-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics