Prediction Of Surgical Site Infections After Major Surgery Using Visible And Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

  • Charlotte L. Ives
  • D.K. Harrison
  • G.S. Stansby
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 599)


Final results of an investigation into whether oxygen saturation of tissues (StO2, measured by spectrophotometry) could predict surgical site infections (SSI) after major abdominal surgery are presented

StO2 was measured on the arm and wound site pre-operatively and then at 12, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively. A Whitland Research RM200 was employed as the visible lightguide spectrophotometer. StO2 measurements using this machine were designated SSO2 (skin SO2). A Hutchinson Inspectra® Model 325 was used for the near infrared spectroscopy (NIS) measurements. StO2 measurements using this machine were designated MSO2 (muscle SO2).

Of 59 patients (38 males, 21 females), 42 healed uneventfully and 17 developed SSI. The overall infection rate was 28.8%. No significant differences were seen in wound SSO2 between outcome groups at any stage.

At 12 hours there was a significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean wound MSO2 (A= 58.3+/-21.6%, B=42.2+/-16.6%, p=0.005, 95% confidence interval = 5.26, 26.98).

A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that when a wound MSO2 of 53% was chosen as the threshold to classify potential infection a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity 73% (chi-squared test, p=0.002) was achieved.

The use of the near-infrared spectrophotometry as a tool to predict wound infections should be further evaluated and advocated.


Surgical Site Infection Outcome Group Tissue Hypoxia Near Infrared Spectroscopy Major Abdominal Surgery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L.A. Israelsson. The surgeon as a risk factor for complications of midline incisions. Eur J Surg 1998; 164(5): 353-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Plowman, N. Graves, M. Griffin et al. The socio-economic burden of hospital acquired infection. Public Health Laboratory Service 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.K. Hunt, B. Zederfeldt, T.K. Goldstick. Oxygen and healing. Am J Surg 1969; 118: 521-5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Allen, J. Maguire, M. Mahdavian et al. Wound hypoxia and acidosis limit neutrophils bacterial killing mechanisms. Arch Surg 1997; 132(9): 991-996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.K. Hunt, M.P. Pai. The effect of varying ambient oxygen tensions on wound metabolism and collagen synthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972; 135: 561-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Jonsson, J.A. Jensen, W.H. Goodson III et al. Tissue oxygenation, anemia, and perfusion in relation to wound healing in surgical patients. Ann Surg 1991; 214(5): 605-13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.H.Niinikoski. Clinical hyperbaric oxygen therapy, wound perfusion, and transcutaneous oximetry. World J Surg 2004; 28(3): 307-11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Greif, O. Akça, E.P. Horn et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med2000; 342(3):161-7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.R. Knighton, B. Halliday, T.K. Hunt. Oxygen as an antibiotic. The effect of inspired oxygen on infection. Arch Surg 1984; 119(2): 199-204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.W. Hopf, T.K. Hunt, J.M. West et al. Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients. Arch Surg1997; 132: 991-6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. McMahon, M. Grigg. Predicting healing of lower-limb ulcers. Aust NZ J Surg 1995; 65(3): 173-76Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.T. Padberg, T.L. Back, P.N. Thompson et al. Transcutaneous oxygen (TcPO2) estimates probability of healing in the ischemic extremity. J Surg Res 1996; 60: 365-369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Kalani, K. Brismar, B. Fagrell et al. Transcutaneous oxygen tension and toe blood pressure as predictors for outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(1):147-51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.K. Harrison, P.T. McCollum, D.J. Newton, et al. Amputation level assessment using lightguide spectrophotometry. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995;19: 139-47Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. Raza, D.J. Newton, D.K. Harrison et al. Disruption of skin perfusion following longitudinal groin incision for infrainguinal bypass surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 17: 5-8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.H. Frank, M. Kessler, K. Appelbaum. The Erlangen micro-lightguide spectrophotometer EMPHO I. Phys Med Biol 1989; 34: 1883-1900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.L. Ives, D.K. Harrison, G. Stansby. Relationships between muscle SO2, skin SO2 and physiological variables. Adv Exp Med Biol 2005, in pressGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.L. Ives, D.K. Harrison, G. Stansby. Prediction of surgical site infections using spectrophotometry: preliminary results. Adv Exp Med Biol 2005, in pressGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T.C .Horan, R.P. Gaynes,W.J. Martone, et al. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 1992; 20: 271-274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.L. Ives, D.K. Harrison, G. Stansby. Prediction of surgical site infections after major surgery using spectrophotometry, submitted to BJS 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlotte L. Ives
    • 1
  • D.K. Harrison
    • 1
  • G.S. Stansby
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical Physics DepartmentUniversity Hospital of North DurhamNorth Road, DurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryFreeman HospitalNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations