Brief Exposure To –2 G Z Reduces Cerebral Oxygenation In Response To Stand Test
The aim of the present experiment was to determine whether a single 30 s of exposure to –2 G z (foot-to-head inertial forces) as orthostatic stress results in altered brain oxygenation control in response to active standing. Cerebral oxygenation (oxy-Hb), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean arterial blood pressure at brain level (MAP brain) were recorded in 12 subjects in supine and then in standing position (10 min), before and after –2 G z centrifugation. The decrease in oxy-Hb (-5 ± 9 vs –9 ± 10 μ M, P 0.001) and in CBV (-2 ± 11 vs –4 ± 12 μ M, P 0.05) upon standing was more important after –2 G z centrifugation, with unchanged MAP brain (-6 ± 7 vs –6 ± 9 mmHg). These findings suggest a downward shift in the static cerebral autoregulation curve.
KeywordsMean Arterial Pressure Cerebral Blood Volume Cerebral Oxygenation Cerebral Autoregulation Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.P.L. Madsen, and N.H. Secher, Near-infrared oximetry of the brain, Prog. Neurobiol. 58, 541-560 (1999).Google Scholar
- 9.P. van der Zee, M. Cope, S.R. Arridge, M. Essenpries, L.A. Potter, A.D. Edwards, J.S. Wyatt, D.C. McCormick, S.C. Roth, E.O.R. Reynolds, and D.T. Delpy, Experimentally measured optical pathlengths for the adult head, calf and forearm and the head of the newborn infant as a function of interoptodes spacing, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 316, 143-153 (1992).Google Scholar
- 10.G. Bertinieri, M. Di Rienzo, A. Cavallazzi, A.U. Ferrari, A. Pedotti, and G. Mancia, Evaluation of baroreceptor reflex by blood pressure monitoring in unanesthetized cats, Am. J. Physiol. 254, 377-383 (1988).Google Scholar
- 17.J.M. Serrador, J.K. Shoemaker, T.E. Brown, M.S. Kassam, R.L. Bondar, and T.T. Schlegel, Cerebral vasoconstriction precedes orthostatic intolerance after parabolic flight, Brain Res. Bull. 53, 113-120 (2000).Google Scholar
- 19.B.J. Yates, Vestibular influences on the sympathetic nervous system, Brain Res. Rev. 17, 51-59 (1992).Google Scholar