Electronic Health Records Systems and Continuity of Care

  • Ralph P. Woodward

The electronic health record system (EMR or EHR) has become a foundation principle in every modern solution offered as a method for improving health care. Despite encouragement from the federal government (Bush, 2004a, b, 2005), few state departments of corrections have implemented electronic medical records systems. This parallels the free world where paper medical records continue to predominate (Moore, 2006; Oliner, 2002). It is not clear why medical systems have been slow to adopt electronic medical records. Cost remains a substantial impediment for most correctional facilities but it cannot be expense alone. Hospitals possess elaborate computerized financial departments and correctional facilities commonly employ computerized booking and commissary programs, thus there is no objection to the use of computerized records in these settings. Indeed, hospital and clinic managers would see as foolhardy any attempt to run a health care business without a computerized financial system. The loss of a misplaced paper billing record would be seen as catastrophic, but surprisingly scant attention is given to the deplorable state of most paper medical records. When a paper chart cannot be recovered, we simply create another one-a process common enough that it is considered normal. This practice would be unacceptable in any other area of the medical business enterprise.


Electronic Health Record Electronic Medical Record System Correctional Facility Electronic Health Record System Clinical Document Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining generalized association rules. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, G.L. (2006). Issues of trust and ethics in computerized clinical decision support systems. Nurs Adm Q, 30, 21–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, G.F., Frogner, B.K., Johns, R.A., & Reinhardt, U.E. (2006). Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. Health Affairs, 25, 819–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D.S., Marken, R.S., Meili, R.C., Wang, C.J., Rosen, M., & Brook, R.H. (2004). Recommendations for comparing electronic prescribing systems: Results of an expert consensus process. Health Affairs, Web Exclusive & Supplemental Exhibit, May 25, W4305–W4317.Google Scholar
  5. Bush, G.W. (2004a, January 20). State of the Union Address.Google Scholar
  6. Bush, G.W. (2004b, April 26). Speech to the annual convention of the American Association of Community Colleges.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, G. W. (2005, January 27). President Discusses Health Care Information Technology Benefits, Intercontinental Cleveland Clinic Suite Hotel, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
  8. Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology. (2006). Retrieved October 15, 2006, from
  9. Coiera, E.W., & Westbrook, J.I. (2006). Should clinical software be regulated? Med J Aust, 184, 601–602.Google Scholar
  10. Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. (2003). Key capabilities of an electronic health records system: Letter report (2003). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, L.S., Collen, M.F., Rubin, L., & Van Brunt, E.E. (1968). Computer-stored medical record. Comput Biomed Res, 1, 452–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2005. Retrieved October 14, 2006, from
  13. Dolan, R.H., Alschuler, L., Boyer, S., Beebe, C., Behlen, F.M., Biron, P. V., & Shabo, A. (2006). HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 3, 30–39.Google Scholar
  14. EMR Edge. (2006). Electronic medical record review and rating. Retrieved October 14, 2006, from
  15. Ferranti, J.M., Musser, R.C., Kawamoto, K., & Hammond, W.E. (2006). The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: A critical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13, 245–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Health Level Seven. HL7 Version 3 Development Framework (HDF). (2005). Ann Arbor, MI: Health Level Seven, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Health Level Seven. (2006). Retrieved October 15, 2006, from
  18. International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Retrieved October 15, 2006, from Last modified 2006–09-12.
  19. Joch, A. (2006). Built to crash. Hosp Health Netw, 80(2), 34–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Korein, J., Goodgold, A.L., & Randt, C.T. (1966). Computer processing of medical data by variable-field-length format: II. Progress and application to narrative documents. JAMA, 196, 132–138.Google Scholar
  21. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC). (2005). Available from Accessed June 11, 2005.
  22. Mattison, J.E., Dolin, R.H., & Laberge, D. (2004). Managing the tensions between national standardization vs. regional localization of clinical content and templates. Medinfo, 11, 1081–1085.Google Scholar
  23. Medical Strategic Planning. (2006). EHR selector. Retrieved October 14, 2006, from
  24. Moore, P.L. (2006). Taming the beast. 2006/2007 physicians practice technology guide. Physicians Practice pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
  25. Oliner, S.D. (2002). Information technology and productivity: Where are we now and where are we going? Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, 87, 15–44.Google Scholar
  26. openEHR Foundation (2004). Retrieved October 26, 2006, from
  27. Sichel, D.E. (1997). The computer revolution: An economic perspective. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  28. Slack, W.V., Hicks, G.P., Reed, C.E., & Van Cura, L.J. (1966). A computer-based medical history system. N Engl J Med, 274, 194–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SNOMED Clinical Terms. College of American Pathologists. (2005). Available from Accessed June 11, 2005.
  30. Walker, T., Managed Healthcare Executive Online, July 1, 2004, retrieved at:
  31. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2005). XML Schema Part 2: Data types. W3C working draft, May 6, 1999. Retrieved June 11, 2005, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph P. Woodward
    • 1
  1. 1.New Jersey Department of CorrectionsBlairstownUSA

Personalised recommendations