Advertisement

Analysis of Affect Intensities in Extremist Group Forums

  • Ahmed Abbasi
  • Hsinchun Chen
Part of the Integrated Series In Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 18)

Affects play an important role in influencing people’s perceptions and decision making. Affect analysis is useful for measuring the presence of hate, violence, and the resulting propaganda dissemination across extremist groups. In this study we performed affect analysis of U.S. and Middle Eastern extremist group forum postings. We constructed an affect lexicon using a probabilistic disambiguation technique to measure and visualize usage of violence and hate affects. These techniques facilitate in depth analysis of multilingual content. The proposed approach was evaluated by applying it across 16 U.S. supremacist and Middle Eastern extremist group forums. Analysis across regions reveals that the Middle Eastern test bed forums have considerably greater violence intensity than the U.S. groups. There is also a strong linear relationship between the usage of hate and violence across the Middle Eastern messages.

Keywords

Middle Eastern Intensity Score Sentiment Analysis Extremist Group Software Piracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Donath. "Identity and deception in the virtual community", In Communities in Cyberspace, London, Routledge Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Moores, and G. Dhillon. "Software piracy: A view from Hong Kong", Comm.of the ACM, vol. 43(12), pp. 88-93, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. D. Mehta. "Pornography in usenet: a study of 9,800 randomly selected images", Cyberpsychology and Behavior, vol. 4(6), pp. 695-703, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Chen. Intelligence and security informatics for international security: information sharing and data mining, London, Springer Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Kaplan and L. Weinberg. The Emergence of a Euro-American Radical Right, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Leets. "Responses to internet hate sites: Is speech too free in cyberspace?", Comm. Law and Policy, vol. 6(2), pp. 287-317.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Burris, E. Smith, and A. Strahm. "White supremacist networks on the internet", Soc. Focus, vol. 33(2), pp. 215-235, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Schafer. "Spinning the web of hate: Web-based hate propagation by extremist organizations", J. Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, vol. 9(2), pp. 69-88, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. Hearst. "Direction-based text interpretation as an information access refinement", In P. Jacobs (Ed.), Text-Based Intelligent Systems: Current Research and Practice in Information Extraction and Retreival. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Nigam and M. Hurst. "Towards a robust metric of opinion", In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Subasic, and A. Huettner. "Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing", IEEE Tran. Fuzzy Systems, vol. 9(4), pp. 483-496, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Agrawal, S. Rajagopalan, R. Srikant, & Y. Xu. "Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior", In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2003), 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Efron. "Cultural orientations: classifying subjective documents by cocitation analysis", In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium Series on Style and Meaning in Language, Art, Music, and Design (AAAI 2004), 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.W. Picard. Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Glaser, J. Dixit, and D. P. Green. "Studying hate crime with the internet: what makes racists advocate racial violence?", J. of Soc. Iss., vol. 58(1), pp. 177-193, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Crilley. "Information warfare: new battle fields terrorists, propaganda, and the internet", In Proceedings of the Association for Information Management, vol. 53(7), pp. 250-264, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. S. Hoffman. "The web of hate: Extremists exploit the internet", Anti-Defamation League, New york, NY, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Whine. "The governance of cyberspace: Politics, technology, and global restructuring", Routledge, London, U.K, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. A. Gerstenfeld, D. R. Grant, C. P. Chiang. "Hate online: A content analysis of extremist internet sites", Anal. of Soc. Issues and Pub. Policy, vol. 3(1), pp. 29-44, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Gustavson, and D. E. Sherkat. "Elucidating the web of hate: The ideological structuring of network ties among white supremacist groups on the internet", Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Sociological Association, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Zhou, E. Reid, J. Qin, H. Chen, and G. Lai. “U.S. extremist groups on the web: Link and content analysis”, IEEE Int. Sys., vol. 20(5), pp. 44-51, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbasi, and H. Chen. "Applying authorship analysis to extremist-group web forum messages", IEEE Int. Sys., vol. 20(5), pp. 67-75, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Nasukawa and J. Yi. "Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing", In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 2003.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Tong. "An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussion", SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Operational Text Classification, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Liu, M. Hu, and J. Cheng. "Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web", In Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005), 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Grefenstette, Y. Qu, J. G. Shanahan, and D. A. Evans. "Coupling niche browsers and affect analysis for an opinion mining application", In 12th International Conference Recherche d'Information Assistee par Ordinateur (RIAO-2004), 2004.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Mishne. "Experiments with mood classification", In Proceedings of Stylistic Analysis of Text for Information Access Workshop (SIGIR, 2005), 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Donath, K. Karahalio, and F. Viegas. "Visualizing conversation", In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI' 02), Chicago, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. M. Henley, M. D. Miller, J. A. Beazley, D. N. Nguyen, D. Kaminsky, and R. Sanders. "Frequency and specificity of referents to violence in news reports of anti-gay attacks", Disc. & Soc., vol. 13(1), pp. 75-104, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Yi, R., Bunescu and W. Niblack. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques", In Proceedings of the 3rd In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Inter. Conf. on Data Mining (ICDM 2003), 2003.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Morinaga, K. Yamanishi, K. Tateishi, and T. Fukushima. "Mining product reputations on the web", In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD 2002), 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Robinson. "Debating the events of September11th: Discursive and interactional dynamics in three online fora", J. Comp. Med. Comm., vol. 10(4).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathain. "Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques", In proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2002), 2002.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. D. Turney. "Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews", In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meetings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002), 2002.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffman. "Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis", In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005), 2005.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ortony, G. L. Clore, M. A. Foss. The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cog. Science, vol. 11(3), pp. 341-364.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. Liu, H. Lieberman, T. Selker. A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge. In Proceedings of the8th International conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Miami, Fl., 2003.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. Weischedel, R. Schwartz, J. Palmucci, M. Meteer, and L. Ramshaw. “Coping with ambiguity and unknown words through probabilistic models”, Comp. Ling., vol. 19(2), pp. 361-382, 1993.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    W. Sack. "Conversation map: An interface for very large-scale conversations", J. Mgmt. Info. Sys., vol. 17(3), pp. 73-92, 2000.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Anti-Defamation League. ADL says Yahoo violates its own rules by hosting hate clubs. ADL Press Release. February 23, 2000.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Scheeres. Wired news: Helpful hints for hate haters. Wired News, June 20, 2001.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    N. Glance, M. Hurst, K. Nigam, M. Siegler, R. Stockton, and T. Tomokiyo. "Analyzing online discussion for marketing intelligence", In Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005), 2005.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Yi, and W. Niblack. “Sentiment mining in WebFountain”, In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2005), 2005.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, and C. Cardie. "Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language", Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. 1(2), 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed Abbasi
    • 1
  • Hsinchun Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations