Assessment of Einstein’s Views and Contributions


Later in this last chapter we assess Einstein’ s contributions to quantum theory. However we start by recognising how much the study of quantum theory has advanced in the half-century since Einstein ’s death.In Part C of this book,we dis- cussed the work of John Bell,the range of novel interpretations of quantum theory, the coming of quantum information theory,and the new ideas on the classical limit of quantum theory,while in the previous chapter we reviewed a few of the current developments.As we have stressed all this serves to vindicate Einstein ’s practi- cally lone opposition to Copenhagen over the last 30 years of his life,but we now ask the question—how would Einstein have reacted to these new lines of study?


Quantum Theory Quantum Information Theory Hide Variable Theory Copenhagen Interpretation Unify Field Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Born M. (ed.) (2005). The Born-Einstein Letters. 2nd edn., Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pais A. (1982). ’subtle is the Lord ⋯’: The Science and Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howard D. (1985). Einstein on locality and separability, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16, 171–201.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howard D. (1991). Review of The Shaky Game by A. Fine, Synthese 86, 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murdoch D. (1987). Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fine A.(1986). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the QuantumTheory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cushing J.T. (1994). Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingencyand the Copenhagen Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jammer M. (1974). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    von Weizsäcker K.F. (1931). Ortsbestimmung eines Elektrons durch ein Microskop [Determination of the position of an electron by means of a microscope], Zeitschrift für Physik 70, 114–30.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Przibram K. (ed.) (1967). Letters on Wave Mechanics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Personalised recommendations