Skip to main content
  • 1008 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 7, we studied the discussions between Einstein and supporters of Copenhagen, in particular Max Born and Wolfgang Pauli, concerning the classical limit of quantum theory and macroscopic quantum theory. We discussed the argument of Born and Pauli that the limiting procedure was straightforward, and that there were no special features in macroscopic quantum theory, such as macrorealism, that could make it different in principle from microscopic quantum theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zeh H.D. (1970). On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory, Foundations of Physics 1, 69–76.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zurek W.H. (1991). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, Physics Today 44(10), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kagan Y.A. and Leggett A.J. (1992). Quantum Tunnelling in Condensed Media. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leggett A.J. (1993). The effect of dissipation on tunnelling, In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology. Tokyo:Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, pp. 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joos E. and Zeh H.D. (1985). The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment, Zeitschrift für Physik B 59, 223–43.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Omnès R. (1994). Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Ch. 7.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Feynman R.P. and Vernon F.L. (1963). The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Annals of Physics (New York) 24, 118–73.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Caldeira A.O. and Leggett A.J. (1983). Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system, Annals of Physics (New York) 149, 374–56; 153, 445 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leggett A.J. (1987). Quantum mechanics at the macroscopic level, In: Chance and Matter. (Souletie J. et al., (eds.)), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 411–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zurek W.H. (1993). Preferred states, predictability, classicality and the environment-induced decoherence, Progress of Theoretical Physics 89, 281–312.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Holland P. (1993). Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Ch. 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolivar A.O. (2004). Quantum-Classical Correspondence. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Leggett A.J. (1980). Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement, Progress of Theoretical. Physics (Supplement) 69, 80–100.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Leggett A.J. and Garg A. (1985). Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism-is the flux there when nobody looks? Physical Review Letters 54, 857–60.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Leggett A.J. (1998). In: Quantum Measurement: Beyond Paradox. (Healey R.A. and Hellman G., (eds.)) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  16. van der Wal C.H., ter Haar A.C.J., Wilhelm F.K., Schouten R.N., Harmans C.J.P.M., Orlando T.P., Lloyd S. and Mooji J.E. (2000). Science 290, 773–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman J.R., Patel V., Chen W, Tolpygo S.K. and Lukens J.E. (2000). Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states, Nature 406, 43–6.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vion D., Aassime A., Cottet A., Joyez P., Pothier H., Urbina C, Esteve D. and Devoret M.H. (2002). Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit, Science 296, 886–9.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berry M.V. and Mount K.E. (1972). Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics, Reports of Progress in Physics 35, 315–97.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berry M.V. (1989). Quantum chaology not quantum chaos, Physica Scripta 40, 335–6.

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Liboff R.L. (1984). The correspondence principle revisited, Physics Today 37, 50–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morse P.M. and Feshbach H. (1953). Methods of Theoretical Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 1643.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Cabrera G.G. and Kiwi M. (1987). Large quantum-number states and the correspondence principle, Physical Review A 36, 2995–8.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Messiah A. (1961). Quantum Mechanics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Vol. 1, Ch. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Andrews M. (1981). The spreading of wavepackets in quantum mechanics, Journal of Physics. A. 14, 1123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peres A. (1993). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer, Ch. 10.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Holland P. (1993). The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ballentine L.E., Gang Y. and Zibin J.P. (1994). Inadequacy of Ehrenfest theorem to characterise the classical regime, Physical Review A 50, 2854–9.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sewell G.L. (2002). Quantum Mechanics and its Emergent Macrophysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Bridging the Quantum-Classical Divide. In: Einstein’s Struggles with Quantum Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71520-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics