Abstract
From the time of Bohr’s Como paper in 1928, the Copenhagen interpretation reigned supreme for several decades. Indeed supporters of the Copenhagen interpretation, such as Leon Rosenfeld and Rudolf Peierls,1 disliked even the use of the term ‘Copenhagen interpretation’, for it suggested that this was one interpretation, possibly among many conceivable ones. For them, the conceptual structures of Bohr and Heisenberg were not an adjunct to quantum theory, but a clear and indispensable component of the theory. Einstein, as we have seen at length, disliked the Copenhagen interpretation. Perhaps as much as or even more then the interpretation itself, he disliked the fact that its supporters considered it immune from criticism, so that no questioning would be taken seriously, and certainly any alternative interpretation would be ruled out of court without being given even fair attention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rosenfeld L. (1962). In: Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics. (Körner S., ed.) New York: Dover; Peierls, R. (1986). In: The Ghost in the Atom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Margenau H. (1936). Quantum mechanical description, Physical Review 49, 240–2.
Everett H. (1957). ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62.
Squires EJ. (1989). An attempt to understand the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory. In: Quantum Theory without Reduction. (Cini M. and Levy-Leblond J.M., (eds.)) Bristol, UK: Adam Hilger, pp. 151–61.
Squires EJ. (1993). Quantum theory and the relation between the conscious mind and the physical world, Synthese 97, 109-23.
Whitaker A. (2006). Einstein, Bohr and the Quantum Dilemma: From Quantum Theory to Quantum Information. 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Witt B.S. and Graham N. (1973). Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 155–65.
Ballentine L.E. (1973). Can the statistical postulate of quantum theory be derived?—a critique of the many-universes interpretation, Foundations of Physics 3, 229–40.
Deutsch D. (1985). Quantum theory as a universal physical theory, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24, 1–41.
Lockwood M. (1989). Mind, Brain, and the Quantum. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch. 13.
Primas H. (1981). Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics, and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Sect. 3.6.
de Broglie L. (1926). Possibility of relating interference and diffraction phenomena to the theory of light quanta, Comptes Rendus 183, 447–8.
de Broglie L. (1926). Remarques sur ta nouvellle mecanique ondulatoire [Remarks on the new wave mechanics] Comptes Rendus 184, 272–4
de Broglie L. (1927). La mecanique ondulatoire at la structure atomique de lamatiére et du rayonnement [Wave mechanics and the atomic structure of material and waves], Journal de Physique et le Radium 8, 225–41
Jammer M. (1974). Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Wiley, pp. 44–9.
de Broglie L. (1928). In: Electrons et Photons: Paris: Gauthier-Villars, pp. 105–132.
Pauli W (1928). In: Electrons et Photons. Paris: Gautier-Villars, pp. 280–282.
Cushing J.T. (1994). Quantum Mechanics ∶ Historical Contingency and the Copenhegen Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chs. 6, 10 and 11.
Selleri F. (1990). Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, Chs. 1 and 7.
Beller M. (1996). The rhetoric of antirealism and the Copenhagen spirit, Philosophy of Science 63, 183–204.
Bohm D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables, Physical Review 85, 166–79, 180–93.
Holland P. (1993). Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 15–20.
Bohm D. and Hiley B.J. (1982). The de Broglie pilot wave theory and the further development of new insights arising out of it, Foundations of Physics 12, 1001–16.
Bohm D. and Hiley B.J. (1993). The Undivided Universe. London: Routledge.
Cushing J.T. (1994). Quantum Mechanics ∶ Historical Contigency and the Copenhegen Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Ch. 4.
Albert D.Z. (1992). Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Ch. 7; Bohm’s alternative to quantum mechanics, Scientific American 270(5), 32-9 (1994).
Cushing J.T., Fine A. and Goldstein S. ((eds.)) (1996). Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Holland P. (1999). Uniqueness of paths in quantum mechanics, Physical Review A60, 4326–30.
Ali M.M.,. Majumdar A.S., Home D. and Sengupta S. (2003). Spin-dependent observable effect for free particles using the arrival time distribution, Physical Review A 68, 042105.
Pan A.K., Ali M.M. and Home D. (2006). Observability of the arrival time distribution using spin-rotator as a quantum clock, Physics Letters A 352, 296–303.
Colijn C. and Vrscay E.R. (2002). Spin-dependent Bohm trajectories for hydrogen eigenstates, Physics Letters A 300, 334–40.
Colijn C. and Vrscay E.R. (2003). Spin-dependent Bohm trajectories associated with an electronic transition in hydrogen, Journal of Physics A 36,4689–702.
Holland P.R. and Philippidis C. (2003). Implications of Lorentz invariance for the guidance equation of two-slit quantum interference, Physical Review A 67, 062105.
Roy S.M. and Singh V. (1995). Causal quantum mechanics treating position and momentum symmetrically, Modern Physics Letters A 10, 709–16.
Roy S.M. and Singh V. (1999). Maximally realistic causal quantum mechanics, Physics Letters A 255, 201–8.
Holland P.R. (2005). Computing the wavefunction from trajectories: particle and wave pictures in quantum mechanics and their relation, Annals of Physics (New York) 315, 505–31.
Holland P.R. (2005). Hydrodynamic construction of the electromagnetic field, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 461, 3659–79.
Bell J.S. (1981). Quantum mechanics for cosmologists, In: Quantum Gravity 2. (Isham C, Penrose R. and Sciama D., (eds.)), Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 611–37; also in Ref. [39], pp. 117-38.
Bell J.S. (2004). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. (1st edn. 1987, 2nd edn. 2004) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bell J.S. (1986). Six possible worlds of quantum mechanics, In: Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 65: Possible Worlds in Arts and Sciences (Allén S., ed.) Stockholm: Nobel Foundation; also in Ref. [39], pp. 181-95.
Gisin N. (1990). Weinberg non-linear quantum mechanics and supraluminal communications, Physics Letters A 143, 1–2.
Polchinski J. (1991). Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physical Review Letters 66, 397–400.
Weinberg S. (1993). Dreams of a Final Theory. London: Vintage, pp.69–70.
Ghirardi G.C., Rimini A., and Weber T. (1985). In: Quantum Probability and Applications. (Accardi L. and Von Waldenfels W., (eds.)) Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 223–32.
Ghirardi G.C., Rimini A., and Weber T. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems, Physical Review D 34,470–91.
Bell J.S. (1987). Are there quantum jumps? In: Schrodinger: Centenary of a Polymath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; also in Ref. [39], pp. 201-12.
Bell J.S. (1990). Against ‘measurement’, Physics World 3(8), 33–40; also in Ref. [39] (2nd edn.), pp. 213-31.
Home D. (1997). Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physics: An Overview from Modern Perspectives. New York: Plenum, pp. 97–119.
Griffiths R.B. (1984). Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics, Journal of Statistical Physics 36, 219–72.
Griffiths R.B. (2003). Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Omnés R. (1992). Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 64, 339–82.
Omnés R. (1999). Quantum Philosophy: Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gell-Mann M. and Hartle J.B. (1993). Classical equations for quantum systems, Physical Review D 47, 3345–82.
Halliwell J. (1994). Aspects of the decoherent histories approach to quantum mechanics, In: Stochastic Evolution of Quantum States in Open Systems and Measurement Processes. (Diósi L. and Lukáks B., (eds.)) Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 54–68.
Peierls R. (1991). In defence of measurement, Physics World 3(1), 19–20.
Mermin N.D. (2002). Whose knowledge? In: Quantum [Un]speakables: From Bell to Quantum Information. (Bertlmann R.A. and Zeilinger A., (eds.)) Berlin: Springer, pp. 271–80.
Brukner C. and Zeilinger A. (1999). Operationally invariant information in quantum measurements, Physical Review Letters 83, 3354–7.
Nelson E. (1967). Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelson E. (1985). Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Santos E. (1991). Comment on’ source of vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy’, Physical Review A 44, 3383–4.
Wallstrom T.C. (1994). Inequivalence between the Schrödinger equation and the Madelung hydrodynamic equation, Physical Review A49, 1613–7.
Bacciagaluppi G. (1999). Nelsonian mechanics revisited, Foundations of Physics Letters 12, 1–16.
Gisin N. and Percival I.C. (1992). The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems, Journal of Physics A 25, 5677–91.
Percival I.C. (1998). Quantum State Diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Machida S. and Namiki M. (1980). Theory of measurement in quantum mechanics: mechanism of reduction of wave packet, Progress of Theoretical Physics 63, 1457–73, 1833-47.
Namiki M. (1986). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 480, 78.
Namiki M. (1988). Many-Hilbert-spaces theory of quantum measurements, Foundations of Physics 18, 29–55.
Namiki M. and Pasacazio S. (1993). Quantum theory of measurement based on the many-Hilbert-spaces approach, Physics Reports 231, 301–411.
Penrose R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch. 6.
Penrose R. (2000). Wavefunction collapse as a real gravitational effect, In: Mathematical Physics 2000. (Fokas A., Kibble T.W.B., Grigouriou A. and Zekarlinski B., (eds.)), London: Imperial College Press, pp. 266–82.
Penrose R. (1998). Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 356, 1927–39.
Penrose R. (2004). The Road to Reality. London: Jonathan Cape, Ch. 30.
Karolyhazy F., Frenkel A., and Lukács B. (1986). On the possible role of gravity in the reduction of the wave function, In: Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. (Penrose R. and Isham C.J., (eds.)) Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–28.
Diósi L. (1984). Gravitation and QM localization of macro-objects, Physics Letters A 105, 199–202.
Penrose R. (2004). The Road to Reality. London: Jonathan Cape, p. 867.
Prigogine I. and George C. (1983). The second law as a selection principle∶the microscopic theory of dissipative processes in quantum systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 80, 4590–4.
Petrosky T. and Prigogine I. (1997). The Liouville space extension of quantum mechanics, Advances in Chemical Physics 99, 1–120.
Misra B., Prigogine I. and Courbage M. (1979). Lyapounov variable ∶ entropy and measurement in quantum mechanics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76, 4768–72.
Prigogine I. and Stengers I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Non-standard Quantum Interpretations. In: Einstein’s Struggles with Quantum Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71520-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71520-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71519-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71520-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)