Otoacoustic Emissions: Basic Studies in Mammalian Models

  • Brenda L. Lonsbury-Martin
  • Glen K. Martin
Part of the Springer Handbook of Auditory Research book series (SHAR, volume 30)


Hearing Loss Noise Exposure Outer Hair Cell Basilar Membrane Otoacoustic Emission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdala C (2004) Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f 1f 2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3572–3580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdala C, Sininger YS, Ekelid M, Zeng F-G (1996) Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear Res 98:38–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson SD, Kemp, DT (1979) The evoked cochlear mechanical response in laboratory primates. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 224:47–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Avan P, Loth D, Menguy C, Teyssou M (1990) Evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig: basic characteristics. Hear Res 44:151–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Avan P, Lemaire JJ, Dordain M, Chazal J, Buki B, Ribari O (1998) Otoacoustic emissions and monitoring of intracranial hypertension. J Audiolog Med 7:46–57.Google Scholar
  6. Avan P, Bonfils P, Mom T (2001) Correlations among distortion product otoacoustic emissions, thresholds and sensory cell impairments. Noise Health 3:1–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley A, Wen H (1994) Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivocochlear system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 110:3–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown AM (1987) Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear Res 31:25–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown AM, Gaskill SA (1990) Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J Acoust Soc Am 88:840–849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown AM, Kemp DT (1984) Suppressibility of the 2f 1f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 13:29–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown MC, Nuttall AL (1984) Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea pig. J Physiol 354:625–646.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown AM, McDowell B, Forge A (1989) Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 42:143–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown AM, Woodward S, Gaskill SJ (1990) Frequency variations in spontaneous sound emissions from guinea pig and human ears. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247:24–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brownell WE (1990) Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 11:82–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, De Ribaupierre Y (1985) Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear hair cells. Science 227:194–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Candreia C, Martin GK, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2004) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions show exceptional resistance to noise exposure in MOLF/Ei mice. Hear Res 194:109–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Canlon B, Borg E, Flock A (1988) Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus. Hear Res 34:197–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cappaert NL, Klis SF, Baretta AB, Juijser H, Smoorenburg GF (2000) Ethyl benzene-induced ototoxicity in rats: a dose-dependent mid-frequency hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1:292–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cevette MJ, Robinette MS, Carter J, Knops JL (1995) Otoacoustic emissions in sudden unilateral hearing loss associated with multiple sclerosis. J Am Acad Audiol 6:197–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cilento B, Norton SJ, Gates GA (2003) The effects of aging and hearing loss on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:382–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark WW, Bohne BA (1978) Animal model for the 4-kHz tonal dip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 87 (Suppl 51):1–16.Google Scholar
  22. Clark WW, Kim DO, Zurek PM, Bohne B.A. (1984) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones. Hear Res 16:299–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohn ES, Kelley PM, Fowler TW, Gorga MP, Lefkowitz DM, Kuehn JH, Schaefer GB, Gobar L, Hahn FJ, Harris DJ, Kimberling WJ (1999) Clinical studies of families with hearing loss attributable to mutations in the connexin 26 gene. Pediatrics 103:546–550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis H (1983) An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 9:79–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. de Kleine E, Wit HP, Avan P, van Dijk P (2001) The behavior of evoked otoacoustic emissions during and after postural changes. J Acoust Soc Am 220:973–980.Google Scholar
  26. Dhar S, Talmadge CL, Long GR, Tubis A (2002) Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2882–2897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dieler R, Shehata-Deiler WE, Brownell WE (1991) Concomitant salicylate-induced alterations of outer hair cell subsurface cisternae and electromotility. J Neurocytol 20:637–653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dolan DF, Guo MH, Nuttall AF (1997) Frequency-dependent enhancement of basilar membrane velocity during olivocochlear bundle stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 102:3587–3596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Douek EE, Dodson HC, Bannister LH (1983) The effects of sodium salicylates on the cochlea of the guinea pig. J Laryngol Otol 93:793–799.Google Scholar
  30. Ehret G (1974) Age-dependent hearing loss in normal hearing mice. Naturwissenschaften 11:506.Google Scholar
  31. Engdahl B, Kemp DT (1996) The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1573–1587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Evans EF, Borerwe TA (1982) Ototoxic effects of salicylates on the responses of single cochlear nerve fibres. Br J Audiol 16:101–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Evans EF, Wilson JP, Borerwe TA (1981) Animal models of tinnitus. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G (eds) Tinnitus. London: Pitman Books, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
  34. Fahey PF, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (2000) Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1786–1802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Franklin DJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Martin GK (1991) Altered susceptibility of 2f 1f 2 acoustic distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res 53:185–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gates GA, Karzon RK, Garcia P, Peterein J, Storandt M, Morris JC, Miller P (1995) Auditory dysfunction in aging and senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Arch Neurol 52:626–634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gorga MA, Neely ST, Bergman BM, Beauchaine KL, Kaminski JR, Peters J, Schulte L, Jesteadt W (1993) A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2639–2648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Grewe TSD, Danhauer LJ, Danhauer KJ, Thornton ARD (1994) Clinical use of otoacoustic emissions in children with autism. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 30:133–142.Google Scholar
  39. Guinan JJ Jr (1986) Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 25:53–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Harding GW, Bohn BA, Ahmad M (2002) DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Hear Res 174:158–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris FP, Probst R (1992) Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with Ménière’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol 112:36–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC,. Martin GK (1989) Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f 2/f 1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 85:220–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hatzopoulos S, Di Stefano M, Campbell KC, Falgione D, Ricci D, Rosignoli M, Finesso M, Albertin A, Previati M, Capitani S, Martini A (2001) Cisplatin ototoxicity in the Sprague-Dawley rat evaluated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 40:253–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J, Laurell G, Avan P, Finesso M, Martini A (2002) Ototoxic effects of cisplatin in a Sprague-Dawley rat model as revealed by ABR and transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures. Hear Res 170:70–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hauser R, Probst R, Harris FP, Frei F (1992) Influence of general anesthesia on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:994–999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hayashida T, Hiel H, Dulon D, Erre J-P, Guilhaume A, Aran J-M (1989) Dynamic changes following combined treatment with gentamicin and ethacrynic acid with and without acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 108:404–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. He N-J, Schmiedt RA (1993) Fine structure of the 2f 1f 2 acoustic distortion product: Changes with primary level. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2659–2669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Henley CM, Owings MH, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1989) Postnatal development of 2f 1f 2 otoacoustic emissions in pigmented rat. Hear Res 43:141–148.Google Scholar
  50. Henley C, Wheatherly RA, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin B (1996) Sensitive developmental periods for kanamycin ototoxic effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 98:93–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Horner KC, Lenoir M, Bock GR (1985) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing-impaired mutant mice. J Acoust Soc Am 78:1603–1611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Howard MA, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (2002) Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 111:285–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Howard MA, Stagner BB, Foster PK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (2003) Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits. J Acoust Soc Am 114:279–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Huang J-M, Money MK, Berlin CI, Keats BJB (1995) Auditory phenotyping of heterozygous sound-responsive (+/dn) and deafness (dn/dn) mice. Hear Res 88:61–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hultcrantz M, Stenberg AE, Fransson A, Canlon B (2000) Characterization of hearing in an X,O “Turner mouse.” Hear Res 143:182–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Jimenez AM, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1999) Age-related loss of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in four mouse strains. Hear Res 138:91–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Jimenez AM, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2001) Susceptibility of DPOAEs to sound overexposure in inbred mice with AHL. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2:233–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Johnson A-C, Canlon, B (1994) Toluene exposure affects the functional activity of the outer hair cells. Hear Res 72:189–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kalluri R, Shera CA (2001) Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanisms model for DPOAE generation. J Acoust Soc Am 109:622–637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Katbamna B, Homnick DN, Marks JH (1999) Effects of chronic tobramycin treatment on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 20:393–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kemp DT (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kemp DT (1979) Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 224:37–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kemp DT (1981) Physiologically active cochlear micromechanics-one source of tinnitus. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G (eds) Tinnitus. London: Pitman Books Ltd., pp. 54–81.Google Scholar
  64. Kemp DT, Brown AM (1983) A comparison of mechanical nonlinearities in the cochleae of man and gerbil from ear canal measurements. In: Klinke R, Hartmann R (eds), Hearing—Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 82–88.Google Scholar
  65. Kemp DT, Brown AM (1984) Ear canal acoustic and round window correlates of 2f 1f 2 distortion generated in the cochlea. Hear Res 13:39–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kemp DT, Chum R (1980) Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 2:213–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM (1986) Acoustic emission cochleography—practical aspects. In: Cianfrone G, Grandori F (eds), Cochlear Mechanics and Otoacoustic Emissions. Scand Audiol Suppl 25, pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
  68. Kim DO (1980) Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hear Res 2:297–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kim DO, Molnar CE, Matthews JW (1980) Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 67:1704–1721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Knight RD, Kemp DT (2001) Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am 109:1513–1525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Konrad-Martin D, Norton SJ, Mascher KE, Tempel BL (2001) Effects of PMCA2 mutation on DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in deafwaddler mice. Hear Res 151:205–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Kössl M, Vater M (2000) Consequences of outer hair cell damage for otoacoustic emissions and audio-vocal feedback in the mustached bat. J Assoc Res Otolaryngology 1:300–314.Google Scholar
  73. Kujawa SG, Fallon M, Bobbin RP (1992) Intracochlear salicylate reduces low-intensity acoustic and cochlear microphonic distortion products. Hear Res 64:73–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Laskey RE, Widholm JJ, Crofton KM, Schantz SL (2002) Prenatal exposure to Arocolor 1254 impairs distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in rats. Toxicol Sci 68:458–464.Google Scholar
  75. Le Calvez S, Avan P, Gilain L, Romand R (1998) CD1 hearing-impaired mice. I. Distortion product otoacoustic emission levels, cochlear function and morphology. Hear Res 120:37–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Li D, Henley CM, O’Malley BW Jr (1999) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cell defects in the hyt/hyt mutant mouse. Hear Res 138:65–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Liberman MC, Zuo J, Guinan JJ Jr (2004) Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am 116:1649–1655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Liu XZ, Newton VE (1997) Distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and low-frequency hearing loss carriers of genes for Waardenburg’s syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 106:220–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Long GR, Tubis A (1988) Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 84:1343–1353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1988) Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in macaque monkeys: a replication. Hear Res 34:13–317.Google Scholar
  81. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Probst R, Coats AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate: II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear Res 33:69–93.Google Scholar
  82. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Harris FP, Hawkins MD., Stagner BB, Martin GK (1990) Distortion-product emissions in humans: I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, Suppl 236:3–13.Google Scholar
  83. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Whitehead ML, Martin GK (1991) Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 34:964–981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, McCoy MJ, Whitehead ML (1994) Testing young children with otoacoustic emissions: middle-ear influence. Am J Otol 15, Suppl 1:13–20.Google Scholar
  85. Maison SF, Liberman MC (2000) Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J Neurosci 20:4701–4707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Manley GA (1983) Frequency spacing of acoustic emissions: A possible explanation. In: Webster WR, Aitkin LM (eds), Mechanisms of Hearing. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Press, pp. 36–39.Google Scholar
  87. Martin GK, Shaw DWW, Dobie RA, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1983) Endolymphatic hydrops in the rabbit: auditory brainstem responses and cochlear morphology. Hear Res12:65–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Martin GK, Probst R, Scheinin SA, Coats AC, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1987) Acoustic distortion products in rabbits. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 28:191–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Coats AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. Hear Res 33:49–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Martin GK, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1989) Endolymphatic hydrops in rabbits: behavioral thresholds, acoustic distortion products, and cochlear pathology. In: Nadol JB (ed) Ménière’s Disease: Pathogenesis, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment, Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini Publications,pp. 205–219.Google Scholar
  91. Martin GK, Franklin DJ, Harris FP, Ohlms LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1990) Distortion-product emissions in humans: III. Influence of hearing pathology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 236:29–44.Google Scholar
  92. Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1998a) Locus of generation for the 2f 1f 2 vs 2f 2f 1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1957–1971.Google Scholar
  93. Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1998b) Effects of loop diureics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits. J Acoust Soc Am 104:972–983.Google Scholar
  94. Martin GK, Stagner BB, Jassir D, Telischi FF, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1999) Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f2: I. Basic findings in rabbits. Hear Res 136:105–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Martin GK, Candreia C, Bohne BA, Harding GW, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2002) An augmented acoustic environment delays age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6J mice as revealed by DPOAEs and cochlear histopathology. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 25:265, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
  96. Martin GK, De La Garza AN, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2005) Detailed DPOAE level/phase maps in normal and noise-damaged rabbit ears: insights into generation processes. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 28:141, p. 52.Google Scholar
  97. Martin GK, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2006) Assessment of cochlear function in mice: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Curr Protocols Neurosci 34:8.21C.1–8.21C.18.Google Scholar
  98. Mathis A, Probst R, De Min N, Hauser R (1991) A child with an unusually high-level spontaneous otoacoustic emission. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:674–676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. McFadden D (2002) Masculinization effects in the auditory system. Arch Sex Behav 31:99–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. McFadden D, Pasanen EG (1994) Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate. J Acoust Soc Am 95:3460–3474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. McFadden D, Plattsmier HS, Pasanen E (1984) Aspirin-induced hearing loss as a model of sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 16:251–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. McWilliams ML, Chen GD, Fechter LD (2000) Low-level toluene disrupts auditory function in guinea pigs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 167:18–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Mensh BD, Patterson MC, Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1993) Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit: I. Altered susceptibility to repeated pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 70:50–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Mills DM (1998) Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones. J Acoust Soc Am 103:507–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Mills DM, Norton SJ, Rubel EW (1993) Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2108–2122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Moulin A (2000) Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interactions between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 107:1471–1481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Moulin A, Kemp DT (1996) Multicomponent acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emission phase in humans. II. Implications for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation. J Acoust Soc Am 100:1640–1662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Mountain DC (1980) Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 210:71–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Murphy WJ, Johnson JL (1999) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 22:372, p. 94.Google Scholar
  110. Naeve SL, Margolis RH, Levine SC, Fournier EM (1992) Effect of ear-canal air pressure on evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 91:2091–2095.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Norton SJ, Rubel EW (1990) Active and passive ADP components in mammalian and avian ears. In: Dallos P, Geisler CD, Matthews JW, Ruggero MA, Steele CR (eds) Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 219–226.Google Scholar
  112. Ohyama K, Wada H, Kobayashi T, Takasaka T (1991) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear Res 56:111–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. O Mahoney CF, Kemp DT (1995) Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3721–3735.Google Scholar
  114. Parham K (1997) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the C57BL/6J mouse model of age-related hearing loss. Hear Res 112:216–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Pasic TR, Dobie RA (1991) Cis-platinum ototoxicity in children. Laryngoscope 101:985–991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Penner MJ, Zhang T (1997) Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited. Hear Res 103:28–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Perez N, Espinosa JM, Fernandez S, Garcia-Tapia R (1997) Use of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions for auditory evaluation in Ménière’s disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:329–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Porter CA, Martin GK, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2006) Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits. J Acoust Soc Am 120:884–900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Pouyatos B, Campo P, Lataye R (2002) Use of DPOAEs for assessing hearing loss caused by styrene in the rat. Hear Res 165:156–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Coats AC (1987). Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss. Am J Otol 8:73–81.Google Scholar
  121. Puel J-L, Bledsoe SC Jr, Bobbin RP, Caesar G, Fallon M. (1989) Comparative actions of salicylate on the amphibian lateral line and guinea pig cochlea. Comp Biochem Physiol 93C:73–80.Google Scholar
  122. Rebillard G, Lavigne-Rebillard M (1992) Effect of reversible hypoxia on the compared time courses of endocochlear potential and 2f 1 - f 2 distortion products. Hear Res 62:142–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Ress BD, Sridhar KS, Balkany TJ, Waxman GM, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1999) Effects of cis-platinum chemotherapy on otoacoustic emissions. The development of an objective screening protocol. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:693–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Robertson D, Johnstone BM, McGill TJ (1980) Effects of loud tones on the inner ear: a combined electrophysiological and ultrastructural study. Hear Res 2:39–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Robles L, Ruggero MA (2001) Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81:1305–1352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Ruggero MA, Kramek B, Rich NC (1984) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a dog. Hear Res 13:293–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Rybak LP (1986) Drug ototoxicity. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 26:79–99.Google Scholar
  128. Sakashita T, Minowa Y, Hachikawa K, Kubo T, Nakai Y (1991) Evoked otoacoustic emissions from ears with idiopathic sudden deafness. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 486:66–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Schmiedt RA (1986) Acoustic distortion in the ear canal: I. Cubic difference tones: Effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1481–1490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Schmiedt RA, Adams JC (1981) Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil. Hear Res 5:295–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Schrott A, Puel J-L, Rebillard G (1991) Cochlear origin of 2f1f 2 distortion products assessed by using 2 types of mutant mice. Hear Res 52:245–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Shehata WE, Brownell WE, Dieler R (1991) Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 111:707–718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Shera CA (2004) Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 25:86–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105:782–798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Shera CA, Tubis A, Talmadge CL (2004) Do forward- and backward-travel waves occur with the cochlea? Countering the critique of Nobili et al. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:349–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Siegel JH, Cerka AJ, Recio-Spinoso A, Temchin N, van Dijk P, Ruggero MA (2005) Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. J Acoust Soc Am 118:2434–2443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Stover L, Norton SJ (1993) The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2670–2681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Stypulkowski PH (1990) Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity. Hear Res 46:113–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Subramaniam M, Salvi RJ, Spongr VP, Henderson D, Powers NL (1994) Changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Hear Res 74:204–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Sutton LA, Lonsbury-Martin B.L, Martin GK, Whitehead ML (1994) Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L_2. Hear Res 75:161–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Telischi FF, Roth J, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Balkany TJ (1995) Patterns of evoked otoacoustic emissions associated with acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 105:675–682, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Telischi FF, Mom T, Agrama M, Stagner BB, Ozdamar O, Bustillo A, Martin GK (1999) Comparison of the auditory-evoked brainstem response wave I to distortion-product otoacoustic emissions resulting from changes to inner ear blood flow. Laryngoscope 109:186–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Torre P 3rd, Fowler CG (2000) Age-related changes in auditory function of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Hear Res 142:131–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Ueda H, Hattori T, Sawaki M, Niwa H, Yanagita, N (1992) The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear Res 62:199–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Vazquez AE, Jimenez AM, Martin GK, Luebke AE, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2004) Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 194:87–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. West BA, Brummett RE, Himes DL (1973) Interaction of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Arch Otolaryngol 98:32–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1991) Effects of the crossed acoustic reflex on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits. Hear Res 51:55–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1992a) Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f 1 - f 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1587–1607.Google Scholar
  149. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1992b) Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f 1 - f 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: II. Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 92:2662–2682.Google Scholar
  150. Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1993) Click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults: detection of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 16:397, p. 100.Google Scholar
  151. Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1996) Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency. J Acoust Soc Am 100:1663–1679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Wier CC, Pasanen EG, McFadden D (1988) Partial dissociation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 84:230–237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Wilson JP (1980) Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate. Hear Res 2:527–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Wilson JP, Evans EF (1983) Effects of furosemide, flaxedil, noise and tone over-stimulation on the evoked otoacoustic emission in cat. Proc Cong Int Union Phys Sci 15:100.Google Scholar
  155. Wilson JP, Sutton GJ (1983) “A family with high-tonal objective tinnitus”—An update. In: Klinke R, Hartmann R (eds) Hearing—Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
  156. Wit HP, Ritsma RJ (1980) Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: some experimental results. Hear Res 2:253–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Withnell RH, McKinley S (2005) Delay dependence for the origin of the nonlinear derived transient evoked otoacoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 117:281–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Withnell RH, Yates GK, Kirk DL (2000) Changes to low-frequency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea. Hear Res 139:1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Yates GK, Kirk DL (1997) Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions—Implications for the reverse transduction process. In: Palmer A, Rees A, Summerfield A, Meddis R (eds) Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing. London: Whurr Publishers, pp. 39–45.Google Scholar
  160. Yoshida N, Liberman MC (2000) Sound conditioning reduces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice. Hear Res 148:213–219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Yoshida N, Hequembourg SJ, Atencio CA, Rosowski JJ, Liberman MC (2000) Acoustic injury in mice: 129/SvEv is exceptionally resistant to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 141:97–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Zheng J, Shen W, He DZ, Long KB, Madison LD, Dallos P (2000) Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 405:149–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Zurek PM, Clark WW (1981) Narrow-band acoustic signals emitted by chinchilla ears after noise exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 70:446–450.Google Scholar
  164. Zwicker E, Manley G (1981) Acoustical responses and suppression-period patterns in guinea pigs. Hear Res 4:43–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenda L. Lonsbury-Martin
  • Glen K. Martin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations