Skip to main content

Policy Options for the Future

  • Chapter
Drug Courts
  • 1873 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores 10 policy options for future drug laws in the United States, from my perspective as a judge with 22 years on the California State bench and my previous service as a federal prosecutor and Naval Judge Advocate General officer. These options are 1. increased zero tolerance, 2. ending drug prohibition, 3. drug treatment, 4. drug rehabilitation programs, 5. drug maintenance programs, 6. needle exchange programs, 7. overdose prevention programs, 8. de-profitization of drugs, 9. education, and 10. federalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thornton M. Policy Analysis: Alcohol Prohibition was a Failure. Washington, DC: The Cato Institute; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Office of National Drug Control Policy Study. Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States 1992–2000. Washington: Government Printing Office; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schrag P. For feds, a pyrrhic victory in pot war. Orange County Register. 2002 February 14, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butterfield F. Number of inmates reaches record 1.8 million. New York Times. March 15, 1999:A12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schiraldi V, Ziedenberg J. Incarceration of all offenders is not the right answer. Los Angeles Daily Journal. January 21, 2000:5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramirez E. Unintended effect of war on drugs found in study. Los Angeles Times. September 20, 2002:A24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moreau R, Yousafzai S. Flowers of destruction. Newsweek. July 14, 2003:33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pot smugglers in uniform escape back to Mexico, officials say. Los Angeles Times. January 25, 2006:A20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marosi R, Lopez R, Connell R. Reports cite incursions on U.S. border. Los Angeles Times. January 26, 2006:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paddock R, Demick B. N. Korea’s growing drug trade seen in botched heroin delivery. Los Angeles Times. May 21, 2003:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rydall CP, Everingham SS. Controlling Cocaine: Supply Versus Demand Programs. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whittemore H. Hitting bottom can be the beginning. Parade Magazine. March 15, 1992:4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Colby A. Working to kick criminal habits. Los Angeles Times. June 3, 1995: B15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Editorial. Attacking the drug/crime link. Los Angeles Times. January 7, 1999: B8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yablonsky L. Link between drugs and crime. Los Angeles Times. January 16, 1999:B9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buechi M, Minder U. Swiss Drug Policy: Harm Reduction and Heroin-Supported Therapy. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Farrell M, Hall W. The Swiss heroin trials: testing alternative approaches. BMJ 1998;316:639.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MacPherson D. Comprehensive Systems of Care for Drug Users in Switzerland and Frankfurt, Germany. Vancouver: Social Planning Department of Vancouver, Canada; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leary W. Report endorses needle exchanges as AIDS strategy. New York Times. September 20, 1995:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lurie P. When science and politics collide: the federal response to needle-exchange programs. Bull NY Acad Med 1995;72:380–396.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Recer P. Study finds needle exchanges don’t promote illegal drugs. Orange County Register. September 20, 1995:7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Committee on Drugs and the Law. A wiser course: ending drug prohibition. Rec Assoc Bar City New York 1994;49(5):521, 562–563.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nadelmann E, McNeely J. Doing methadone right. Public Interest 1996;123: 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Editorial. Just the right dose. Los Angeles Times. January 30, 2006:B10.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ackerman E. The latest buzz on hemp: U.S. farmers want the ban on cultivating the plant lifted. U.S. News & World Report. March 15, 1999:50.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Turner C. New hemp isn’t meant for smoking. Los Angeles Times. May 16, 1994:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenbaum M. A mother’s advice about drugs. San Francisco Chronicle. September 7, 1998:A23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gray, J.P. (2007). Policy Options for the Future. In: Lessenger, J.E., Roperd, G.F. (eds) Drug Courts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71433-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71433-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71432-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71433-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics