Abstract
In the social and psychological sciences, few findings have been so reliably demonstrated that they may qualify as laws of human behavior. The principles of operant conditioning or contingency management are one such set of laws. These principles have been proven time and again in a multitude of diverse settings to the point that they are no longer the subject of scientific dispute. The techniques for effective implementation of operant conditioning are reviewed in this chapter. If one’s goal is to improve adaptive functioning and reduce antisocial behavior on the part of offenders, then it is essential to closely monitor their behavior and impose certain and immediate sanctions for infractions and rewards for achievements (1). Failing to punish misconduct inevitably makes behavior worse, and failing to reward accomplishments makes those accomplishments less likely to recur.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Marlowe DB, Kirby KC. Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: lessons from behavioral research. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1999;2:1–31.
Marlowe DB. Effective strategies for intervening with drug abusing offenders. Villanova Law Rev 2002;47:989–1025.
Burdon WM, Roll JM, Prendergast ML, Rawson RA. Drug courts and contingency management. J Drug Issues 2001;31:73–90.
Harrell A, Roman J. Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: the impact of graduated sanctions. J Drug Issues 2001;31:207–232.
Martin G, Pear J. Behavior Modification: What It Is and How to Do It, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1999.
Hineline PN. Negative reinforcement and avoidance. In Honig WK, Straddon JER, eds. Handbook of Operant Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1976:364–414.
Sidman M. Avoidance behavior. In Honig WK, ed. Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966:448–498.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals. Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice; 1997.
Stitzer ML, McCaul ME. Criminal justice interventions with drug and alcohol abusers: the role of compulsory treatment. In Edwards EK, Braukmann CJ, eds. Behavioral Approaches to Crime and Delinquency. New York: Plenum; 1987:225–233.
Taxman FS. Graduated sanctions: stepping into accountable systems and offenders. Prison J 1999;79:182–204.
Azrin NH, Holz WC. Punishment. In Honig WK, ed. Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966:388–447.
Van Houten R. Punishment: from the animal laboratory to the applied setting. In Axelrod S, Apsche J, eds. The Effects of Punishment on Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1983:13–44.
Nurco DN, Hanlon TE, Kinlock TW. Recent research on the relationship between illicit drug use and crime. Behav Sci Law 1991;9:221–249.
Goldkamp JS. The drug court response: issues and implications for justice change. Albany Law Rev 2000;63:923–961.
Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Lee PA, Kirby KC, Bovasso G, McLellan AT. Status hearings in drug court: when more is less and less is more. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002 68:151–157.
Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA. The judge is a key component of drug court. Drug Court Rev 2004;4:1–34.
Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA, Dugosh KL, Benasutti KM. Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime Delinquency 2006;52:52–76.
Newsom C, Favell JE, Rincover A. The side effects of punishment. In Axelrod S, Apsche J, eds. The Effects of Punishment on Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1983:285–316.
Sidman M. Coercion and its Fallout. Boston: Authors Cooperative; 1988.
Thibaut JW, Walker L. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1975.
Tyler TR. Psychological models of the justice motive: antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67:850–863.
Sherman LW. Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: a theory of the criminal justice sanction. J Res Crime Delinquency 1993;30:445–473.
Seligman MEP. Helplessness. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1975.
Huddleston CW, Meyer W, Marlowe DB. Rethinking Court Responses to Client Behavior: Incentives and Sanctions—New Tools to Build a Better Drug Court. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute and Bureau of Justice Assistance; 2006.
Meyer WG. Developing Consensus on Sanction and Incentive Guidelines in the Drug Court. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute; 2002.
Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Foerg FE, Donham R, Badger G. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:568–576.
Sisson RW, Azrin NH. The community reinforcement approach. In Hester RK, Miller WR, eds. Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: Effective Alternatives. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon; 1989:242–258.
Hora PF, Schma WG, Rosenthal JTA. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionalizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Rev 1999;74:439–538.
Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull 1999;125:627–668.
Marlowe DB, Glass DJ, Merikle EP, Festinger DS, DeMatteo DS, Marczyk GR, et al. Efficacy of coercion in substance abuse treatment. In Tims FM, Leukefeld CG, Platt JJ, eds. Relapse and Recovery in Addictions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2001:208–227.
Satel SL. Drug Treatment: The Case for Coercion. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute; 1999.
Taxman FS, Marlowe DB. Risk, needs, responsivity: in action or inaction? Crime Delinquency 2006;52:3–6.
Andrews DA, Bonta J. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 2nd ed. Cincinnati: Anderson; 1998.
DeMatteo DS, Marlowe DB, Festinger DS. Secondary prevention services for clients who are low risk in drug court: a conceptual model. Crime Delinquency 2006;52:114–134.
Marlowe DB, Patapis NS, DeMatteo DS. Amenability to treatment of drug offenders. Fed Probation 2003;67:40–46.
Peters RH, Haas AL, Murrin MR. Predictors of retention and arrest in drug court. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1999;2:33–60.
Patterson CM, Newman JP. Reflectivity and learning from aversive events: toward a psychological mechanism for the syndromes of disinhibition. Psychol Rev 1993;100:716–736.
Petry NM. Discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers: relationship to antisocial personality disorder. Psychopharmacology 2002;162:425–432.
Fishbein D. Neuropsychological function, drug abuse, and violence: a conceptual framework. Crim Justice Behav 2000;27:139–159.
Marlowe DB, Kirby KC, Festinger DS, Husband SD, Platt JJ. Impact of comorbid personality disorders and personality disorder symptoms on outcomes of behavioral treatment for cocaine dependence. J Nerv Ment Dis 1997;185:483–490.
Messina N, Farabee D, Rawson R. Treatment responsivity of cocaine-dependent patients with antisocial personality disorder to cognitive-behavioral and contingency management interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:320–329.
Silverman K, Wong C, Umbricht-Schneiter A, Montoya I, Schuster C, Preston K. Broad beneficial effects of cocaine abstinence reinforcement among methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998;66:811–824.
Higgins ST. Some potential contributions of reinforcement and consumer-demand theory to reducing cocaine use. Addict Behav 1996;21:803–816.
Kleiman MAR, Tran TH, Fishbein P, Magula MT, Allen W, Lacy G. Opportunities and Barriers in Probation Reform: A Case Study of Drug Testing and Sanctions. Berkeley: University of California, California Policy Research Center; 2003.
Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA, Schepise MM, Hazzard JER, Merrill JC, et al. Are judicial status hearings a key component of Drug Court? During-treatment data from a randomized trial. Crim Justice Behav 2003;30:141–162.
Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA. The role of judicial status hearings in drug court. Offender Subst Abuse Rep 2003;3:33–34, 44–46.
McLellan AT, Cacciola J, Kushner H, Peters R, Smith I, Pettinati H. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index: cautions, additions and normative data. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992;9:461–480.
DeMatteo DS, Festinger DS, Lee PA, Marlowe DB. Substance Use Patterns in Drug Court: No Problem? Paper presented at the 67th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, June 2005, Orlando, Florida.
Harrell A, Cavanagh S, Roman J. Final Report: Findings From the Evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 1999.
Harrell A, Smith B. Evaluation of the District of Columbia Superior Court Drug Intervention Program: Focus Group Interviews. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 1997.
Goldkamp JS, White MD, Robinson JB. An honest chance: perspectives on drug courts. Fed Sentencing Rep 2002;6:369–372.
Satel SL. Observational study of courtroom dynamics in selected drug courts. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1998;1:43–72.
Cooper CS. 1997 Drug Court Survey Report: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice; 1997.
Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA, Fox G, Alexander R, Mastro NK, et al. Contingency Management in Drug Court. Presentation at the 67th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, June 2005, Orlando, Florida.
Prendergast ML, Hall EA, Roll JM. Judicial Supervision and Contingency Management in Treating Drug-Abusing Offenders: Preliminary Outcomes. Poster session presented at the 67th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, June 2005, Orlando, Florida.
Marlowe DB, DeMatteo DS, Festinger DS. A sober assessment of drug courts. Fed Sentencing Rep 2003;16:153–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marlowe, D.B. (2007). Strategies for Administering Rewards and Sanctions. In: Lessenger, J.E., Roperd, G.F. (eds) Drug Courts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71433-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71433-2_22
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71432-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71433-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)