Advertisement

Behavioral Intervention Studies

  • Sana Loue
  • Earl C. Pike

Keywords

Risk Behavior Ethical Dilemma Heroin Addict Strengthening Research Capacity International Ethical Guideline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charland, L.C. (2002). Cynthia’s dilemma: Consenting to heroin prescription. American Journal of Bioethics, 2, 37–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Childress, C.A. & Asamen, J.K. (1998). The emerging relationship of psychology and the Internet: Proposed guidelines for conducting Internet intervention research. Ethics & Behavior, 8, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Council of International Organizations for Medical Sciences. (2002). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2005). Special Considerations for Epidemiological Research. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
  5. De Vries, R., DeBruin, D.A., & Goodgame, A. (2004). Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here? Ethics & Behavior, 14((4), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dresser, R. (2001). Dementia research: Ethics and policy for the twenty-first century. Georgia Law Review, 45, 661–690.Google Scholar
  7. Giesbrecht, N. & Ferris, J. (1993). Community-based research initiatives in prevention. Addiction, 88(Supplement), 83S-93S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. High, D.M., Whitehouse, P.J., Post, S.G., & Berg, L. (1994). Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer research: A position statement. Alzheimer’s Disease & Associated Disorders, 8, 66–74.Google Scholar
  9. Hohmann, A.H. & Shear, M.K. (2002). Community-based intervention research: Coping with the “noise” of real life in study design. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159((2), 201–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levine, R.J. (1988). Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ling, W. (2002). Cynthia’s dilemma. American Journal of Bioethics, 2, 55–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lundqvist, T. (2005). Cognitive consequences of cannabis use: Comparison with abuse of stimulants and heroin with regard to attention, memory and executive functions, Pharmacological and Biochemical Behavior, 81, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacQueen, K.M., Shapiro, K., Karim, Q.A., & Sugarman, J. (2004). Ethical challenges in international HIV prevention research. Accountability in Research, 11, 49–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2006). Behavioral Therapies Development Program. Available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide.Last accessed August 29, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and Policy Issues Involving Human Participants, vol. 1. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  16. Perring, C. (2002). Resisting the temptations of addiction rhetoric. American Journal of Bioethics, 2, 51–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shapiro, K. & Benatar, S.R. (2005). HIV prevention research and global inequality: Steps towards improved standards of care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 39–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephenson, J.M. (1999). Evaluation of behavioural interventions in HIV/STI prevention. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 75, 69–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sana Loue
    • 1
  • Earl C. Pike
    • 2
  1. 1.Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland
  2. 2.AIDS Taskforce of Greater ClevelandCleveland

Personalised recommendations