Upgrading Conventional Pacemakers to CRT: Indications and Technical Considerations

  • Safwat A. Gassis
  • Angel R. León


Right Ventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Ventricular Pace Biventricular Pace Right Ventricular Pace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gras D, Leclercq C, Tang AS, Bucknall C, Luttikhuis HO, Kirstein-Pedersen A. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure the multicenter InSync clinical study. Eur J Heart Fail 2002;4:311–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S, et al. Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:111–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL, et al. Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: The MIRACLE ICD Trial. JAMA 2003;289:2685–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2140–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linde C, Braunschweig F, Gadler F, Bailleul C, Daubert JC. Long-term improvements in quality of life by biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathy study (MUSTIC). Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1090–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1845–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cazeau S, Ritter P, Lazarus A, et al. Multisite pacing for end-stage heart failure: early experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1748–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leclercq C, Cazeau S, Le Breton H, et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1825–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, et al. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 2001;344:873–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, et al. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: A report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 2002;143:398–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H, Olson S, Shafer P, Wooley CF. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 1989;79:845–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thackray SD, Witte KK, Nikitin NP, Clark AL, Kaye GC, Cleland JG. The prevalence of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical regional pacemaker population. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1143–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): Developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2005;112:e154–235.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanabe A, Mohri T, Ohga M, et al. The effects of pacing-induced left bundle branch block on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performances. Jpn Heart J 1990;31:309–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verbeek XA, Vernooy K, Peschar M, Van Der Nagel T, Van Hunnik A, Prinzen FW. Quantification of interventricular asynchrony during LBBB and ventricular pacing. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002;283:H1370–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vernooy K, Verbeek XA, Peschar M, Prinzen FW. Relation between abnormal ventricular impulse conduction and heart failure. J Interv Cardiol 2003;16: 557–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, McVeigh ER. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1735–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karpawich PP, Rabah R, Haas JE. Altered cardiac histology following apical right ventricular pacing in patients with congenital atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:1372–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thambo JB, Bordachar P, Garrigue S, et al. Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Circulation 2004;110:3766–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee MA, Dae MW, Langberg JJ, et al. Effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular perfusion, innervation, function and histology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:225–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH, et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:148–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leclercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Daubert C. Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J 1995;129:1133–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenqvist M, Bergfeldt L, Haga Y, Ryden J, Ryden L, Owall A. The effect of ventricular activation sequence on cardiac performance during pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1279–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002;288:3115–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:744–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PE, et al. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation 1998;97:987–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing. Circulation 2006;113:2082–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saad EB, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, et al. Frequency and associations of symptomatic deterioration after dual-chamber defibrillator implantation in patients with ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:79–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miyoshi F, Kobayashi Y, Itou H, et al. Prolonged paced QRS duration as a predictor for congestive heart failure in patients with right ventricular apical pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:1182–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steinberg JS, Fischer A, Wang P, et al. The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:359–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1451–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: Echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:614–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xiao HB, Brecker SJ, Gibson DG. Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. Br Heart J 1993;69:166–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cazeau S, Bordachar P, Jauvert G, et al. Echocardiographic modeling of cardiac dyssynchrony before and during multisite stimulation: a prospective study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26:137–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Garrigue S, Barold SS, Valli N, et al. Effect of right ventricular pacing in patients with complete left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:600–4,A8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1097–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Abdollah H, et al. Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing: Effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up. Circulation 2004;109:357–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Lafitte S, et al. Interventricular and intra-left ventricular electromechanical delays in right ventricular paced patients with heart failure: implications for upgrading to biventricular stimulation. Heart 2003;89:1401–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shukla HH, Hellkamp AS, James EA, et al. Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:245–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ritter O, Koller ML, Fey B, et al. Progression of heart failure in right univentricular pacing compared to biventricular pacing. Int J Cardiol 2006;110:359–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baker CM, Christopher TJ, Smith PF, Langberg JJ, Delurgio DB, Leon AR. Addition of a left ventricular lead to conventional pacing systems in patients with congestive heart failure: Feasibility, safety, and early results in 60 consecutive patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1166–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Leon AR, Greenberg JM, Kanuru N, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: Effect of upgrading to biventricular pacing after chronic right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1258–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Horwich T, Foster E, De Marco T, Tseng Z, Saxon L. Effects of resynchronization therapy on cardiac function in pacemaker patients “upgraded” to biventricular devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:1284–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gronda E, Lunati M, Bocchiardo M, et al. Upgrade to biventricular pacing device of pacemaker holders for antibradycardia indications. Heart Failure Congress 2005;abstract 740.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Valls-Bertault V, Fatemi M, Gilard M, Pennec PY, Etienne Y, Blanc JJ. Assessment of upgrading to biventricular pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing and congestive heart failure after atrioventricular junctional ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. Europace 2004;6:438–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Leclercq C, Walker S, Linde C, et al. Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1780–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Milasinovic G, Sperzel J, Smith TW, et al. Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:406–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Casavant D, et al. Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:811–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1997;350:1210–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brandt J, Anderson H, Fahraeus T, Schuller H. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:633–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace 1999;1:113–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Occhetta E, Bortnik M, Magnani A, et al. Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: A crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1938–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ozcan C, Jahangir A, Friedman PA, et al. Significant effects of atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation on left ventricular function and long-term survival in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:33–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ozcan C, Jahangir A, Friedman PA, et al. Long-term survival after ablation of the atrioventricular node and implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1043–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Szili-Torok T, Kimman GP, Theuns D, Poldermans D, Roelandt JR, Jordaens LJ. Deterioration of left ventricular function following atrio-ventricular node ablation and right ventricular apical pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Europace 2002;4:61–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Doshi RN, Daoud EG, Fellows C, et al. Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:1160–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hay I, Melenovsky V, Fetics BJ, et al. Short-term effects of right-left heart sequential cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, and atrioventricular nodal block. Circulation 2004;110:3404–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Melenovsky V, Hay I, Fetics BJ, et al. Functional impact of rate irregularity in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2005;26:705–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Puggioni E, Brignole M, Gammage M, et al. Acute comparative effect of right and left ventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:234–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J, Geisel J, Bohm M, Frohlig G. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: The Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1927–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Martinelli M, Costa R, de Siqueira SF, Ramires JA. COMBAT—conventional versus multisite pacing for bradyarrhythmia therapy: Rationale of a prospective randomized multicenter study. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:219–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Witte KK, Pipes RR, Nanthakumar K, Parker JD. Biventricular pacemaker upgrade in previously paced heart failure patients—improvements in ventricular dyssynchrony. J Card Fail 2006;12:199–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hoijer CJ, Meurling C, Brandt J. Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemakers and heart failure: A double-blind, randomized crossover study. Europace 2006;8:51–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Eldadah ZA, Rosen B, Hay I, et al. The benefit of upgrading chronically right ventricle-paced heart failure patients to resynchronization therapy demonstrated by strain rate imaging. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:435–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Breithardt OA, Stellbrink C, Herbots L, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy can reverse abnormal myocardial strain distribution in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:486–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Abraham WT, Young JB, Leon AR, et al. Effects of cardiac resynchronization on disease progression in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and mildly symptomatic chronic heart failure. Circulation 2004;110:2864–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Linde C, Gold M, Abraham WT, Daubert JC. Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction with previous symptoms or mild heart failure—the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Am Heart J 2006;151:288–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Williams EH, Tyers GF, Shaffer CW. Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis of the arm associated with permanent transvenous pacing electrodes. Chest 1978;73:613–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Spittell PC, Hayes DL. Venous complications after insertion of a transvenous pacemaker. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:258–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mitrovic V, Thormann J, Schlepper M, Neuss H. Thrombotic complications with pacemakers. Int J Cardiol 1983;2:363–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Antonelli D, Turgeman Y, Kaveh Z, Artoul S, Rosenfeld T. Short-term thrombosis after transvenous permanent pacemaker insertion. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:280–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Goto Y, Abe T, Sekine S, Sakurada T. Long-term thrombosis after transvenous permanent pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1192–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zuber M, Huber P, Fricker U, Buser P, Jager K. Assessment of the subclavian vein in patients with transvenous pacemaker leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:2621–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sticherling C, Chough SP, Baker RL, et al. Prevalence of central venous occlusion in patients with chronic defibrillator leads. Am Heart J 2001;141:813–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lickfett L, Bitzen A, Arepally A, et al. Incidence of venous obstruction following insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A study of systematic contrast venography on patients presenting for their first elective ICD generator replacement. Europace 2004;6:25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Oginosawa Y, Abe H, Nakashima Y. The incidence and risk factors for venous obstruction after implantation of transvenous pacing leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1605–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Rozmus G, Daubert JP, Huang DT, Rosero S, Hall B, Francis C. Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2005;13:9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bar-Cohen Y, Berul CI, Alexander ME, et al. Age, size, and lead factors alone do not predict venous obstruction in children and young adults with transvenous lead systems. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:754–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lin LJ, Lin JL, Tsai WC, Teng JK, Tsai LM, Chen JH. Venous access thrombosis detected by transcutaneous vascular ultrasound in patients with single-polyurethane-lead permanent pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:396–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    de Cock CC, Vinkers M, Van Campe LC, Verhorst PM, Visser CA. Long-term outcome of patients with multiple (> or = 3) noninfected transvenous leads: A clinical and echocardiographic study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:423–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gula LJ, Ames A, Woodburn A, et al. Central venous occlusion is not an obstacle to device upgrade with the assistance of laser extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:661–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Safwat A. Gassis
  • Angel R. León

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations