The Effect of Arrest and Justice System Sanctions on Subsequent Behavior: Findings from Longitudinal and Other Studies

  • David Huizinga
  • Kimberly L. Henry


The purpose of this chapter is to summarize what is known about the effect of arrest on subsequent behavior, especially delinquent behavior, and what prospective longitudinal studies have added to this knowledge base. In addition, we examine what longitudinal studies have found about the effect of sanctions following arrest. In so doing, what policy relevant actions might be justified on the basis of current knowledge about the effects of arrest and sanctions and the opportunities for longitudinal studies to provide additional information about these effects are considered.


Justice System Crime Rate Juvenile Justice Juvenile Justice System Subsequent Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ageton, S. S., & Elliott, D. S. (1974). The effects of legal processing on delinquent orientations. Social Problems, 22(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L., Chiricos, T., & Waldo, G. (1977). Formal and informal sanctions: A comparison of deterrent effects. Social Problems, 25, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime, Version 4.0. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Apospori, E., & Alpert, G. (1993). The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in changes in perceptions of severity of legal sanctions over time. Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, I., Consterdine, M., Hullin, R., McGuire, R., & Tyrer, S. (1978). The effect of two randomly allocated court procedures on truancy. British Journal of Criminology, 18, 232–244.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, I., Hullin, R., & McGuire, R. (1979). A randomly controlled trial of two court procedures in truancy. In D. P. Farrrington, K. Hawkins, & S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law, and legal processes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 44(4), 1287–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop. D.M. (1984). Legal and extralegal barriers to delinquency: A panel analysis. Criminology, 22(3), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumstein, A., & Moitra, S. (1980). The identification of career criminals and chronic offenders in a cohort. Law and Policy Review Quarterly, 2, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brennan, P. A., & Mednick, S. A. (1994). Learning theory approach to the deterrence of criminal recidivism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(3), 430–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, D.W. (1978). Arrest rates and crime rates:When does a tipping effect occur? Social Forces, 57(2), 671–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bushway, S. D. (1998). The impact of arrest on the job stability of young White American men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(4), 454–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cameron, M. O. (1964). The Booster and the Snitch. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chamlin, M. B. (1988). Crime and arrest: An autoregressive integrated average approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chamlin, M. B. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of the arrest-crime relationship: A further examination of the tipping effect. Justice Quarterly, 8, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiricos, T. G., & Waldo, G. P. (1970). Punishment and crime: An examination of some empirical evidence. Social Problems, 18, 200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cloniger, D. O., & Sartorius, L. C. (1979). Crime rates, clearance rates and enforcement effort: The case of Houston, Texas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 38(4), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Li, S. (1999). Legal sanctions and youths’ status achievement: A longitudinal study. Justice Quarterly, 16(2), 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Decker, S. H., & Kohfeld, C. W. (1985). Crime, crime rates, arrest, and arrest ratios. Criminology, 23(3), 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunford, F. W., Osgood, D. W., & Weichselbaum, H. F. (1982). National evaluation of diversion projects. Washington DC: USDOJ, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, National Institute for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (NCJ#80830).Google Scholar
  23. Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination. Criminology, 32, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Morse, B. (1986). Self-reported violent offending. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 472–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erickson, M., & Gibbs, J. (1978). Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and deterrence doctrine. Social Problems, 25, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eskridge, C. (1983). Flaws in the theory and practice of general deterrence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. San Antonio, March, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. Espiritu, R., & Huizinga, D. H. (1999). Delinquent behavior of youth in the juvenile justice system before, during, and after different court dispositions. A Research Brief of the Denver Youth Survey.Google Scholar
  28. Farrington, D. P. (1977). The effects of public labeling. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 112–125.Google Scholar
  29. Forst, B., & Rhodes, W. (1992). Sentencing in Eight United States District Courts, 1973–1978 (ICPSR 8622). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  30. Gibbs, J. P. (1968). Crime, punishment and deterrence. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48, 515–530.Google Scholar
  31. Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime punishment and deterrence. New York, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  32. Gold, M., & Williams, J. (1970). National study of the aftermath of apprehension. Prospectus, 3, 3–12.Google Scholar
  33. Gottfredson, D. M. (1999). Effects of judges’ sentencing decisions on criminal careers. National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief. November.Google Scholar
  34. Greenberg, D. F., & Kessler, R. C. (1982). The effect of arrests on crime: A multivariate panel analysis. Social Forces, 60(3), 771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenberg, D. F., Kessler, R. C., & Logan, C. H. (1979). A panel model of crime rates and arrest rates. American Sociological Review, 44, 843–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hagan, J. (1993). The social embeddedness of crime and unemployment. Criminology, 31, 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hemphill, S. A., Toumbourou, J. W., Herrenkohl, T. I., McMorris, B. J., & Catalano, R. F. (2006). The effect of school suspensions and arrests on subsequent adolescent behavior in Australia and the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 736–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hepburn, J. R. (1977). The impact of police intervention upon juvenile delinquents. Criminology, 15, 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirshfield, P. J. (2002). Preparing for prison? The impact of legal sanctions on educational performance. Unpublished dissertation, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  40. Howell, J. H. (1997). Juvenile justice and youth violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Huizinga, D., & Elliott, A. (2003). The effect of arrest on personal characteristics related to subsequent offending. Washington DC: Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice Research and Evaluation Conference, July.Google Scholar
  42. Huizinga, D., Elliott, D. S., & Dunford, F.W. (1986). The effect of arrest on subsequent delinquent behavior. Boulder, CO: Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Orlando Florida. National Youth Survey Report, Behavioral Research Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F., & Weiher, A. (1996). The impact of arrest on subsequent delinquent behavior. In Loeber, R., Huizinga, D., & Thornberry, T. P. (Eds.), Annual report: Program of research on the causes and correlates of delinquency. Washington, DC: The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  44. Huizinga, D. H., & Esbensen, F. (1992). An arresting view of juvenile justice. School Safety, Spring, 15–17.Google Scholar
  45. Huizinga, D., Schumann, K., Ehret, B., & Elliott, A. (2003a). The effect of juvenile justice system processing on subsequent delinquent and criminal behavior: A cross-national study. Final report to The National Institute of Justice, Grant Number 1999IJCX0037.Google Scholar
  46. Huizinga, D., Thornberry, T. P., & Loeber, R. (1995). Recent findings from the program of research on the causes and correlates of delinquency. Washington DC: Report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  47. Huizinga, D., Weiher, A. W., Espiritu, R., & Esbensen, F. (2003b). Delinquency and crime: Some highlights from the Denver Youth Survey. In Thornberry, T. P. & Krohn, M. D. (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies. NewYork: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Janosz, M., LeBlanc, M., Boulerice, N. & Tremblay, R. E. (1997). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(6), 733–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jensen, G. F. (1969). Crime doesn’t pay: Correlates of a shared misunderstanding. Social Problems, 17, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaplan, H. B., & Damphouse, K. R. (1997). Negative social sanctions, self-derogation, and deviant behavior: Main and interactive effects in longitudinal perspective. Deviant Behavior, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kerley, K. R., & Copes, H. (2004). The effects of criminal justice contact on employment stability for white-collar and street-level offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klein, M. W. (1974). Labeling, deterrence, and recidivism: A study of police dispositions of juvenile offenders. Social Problems, 22, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Klein, M. W. (1986). Labeling theory and delinquency policy: An experimental test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13(1) 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kobrin, S., Lubeck, S., Hansen, E.W., & Yeaman, R. L. (1972). The deterrent effectiveness of criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: Final report to the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement and Assistance Administration, U.S.Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  55. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention with serious offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313–345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Lizotte, A. J., Smith, C. A., Levy, C., Ehrhard, S., Loeber, R., & Huizinga, D. H. (2004). The effect of police contact and arrest on precocious transitions to adulthood. Report submitted to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  57. Logan, C. H. (1975). Arrest rates and deterrence. Social Science Quarterly, 56(3), 376–389.Google Scholar
  58. Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71 , 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007) Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance. European Journal of Criminology, In press.Google Scholar
  60. Murray, C., & Cox, L. A. (1979). Beyond probation: Juvenile corrections and the chronic juvenile offender. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Nagin, D. (1978). Crime rates, sanction levels, and constraints on prison population. Law and Society Review, 12(3), 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nagin, D. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first centrury. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 23). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nagin, D., & Waldfogel, J. (1995). The effects of criminality and conviction on the labor market status of young British offenders. International Review of Law and Economics, 15, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Needels, K. (1996). Go directly to jail and do not collect? A long-term study of recidivism. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 33, 471–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Packer, H. L. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Paternoster, R. (1978). The labeling effect of police apprehension: identity, exclusion, and secondary deviance. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University, 1978. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 7917065.Google Scholar
  67. Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the literature. Justice Quarterly, 4(2), 173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paternoster, R., & Piquero, A. (1995). Reconceptualizing deterrence: An empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 32(3), 251–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., Kahan, J., & Peterson, J. (1985). Executive summary of Rand’s study, granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives. Crime and Delinquency, 31(3), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rose, G., & Hamilton, R. A. (1970). Effects of a juvenile liaison scheme. British Journal of Criminology, 10, 2–20.Google Scholar
  71. Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency (pp. 133–161). In T. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.Google Scholar
  73. Schneider, A. L. (1982). The effects of deinstitutionalization of status offenders: A review essay. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 182–195.Google Scholar
  74. Shannon, L. W. (1980). Assessing the relationship of adult criminal careers to juvenile careers. In C. Abt (Eds.), Problems in American Social Policy (pp. 232–246). Cambridge, MA: Abt Books..Google Scholar
  75. Shannon, L. W. (1985) A more precise evaluation of the effects of sanctions. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Iowa City: Iowa Urban Community Research Center, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  76. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. D. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  77. Short, J. F., Jr., & Nye, F. I. (1958). Extent of unrecorded juvenile delinquency: tentative conclusions. Journal of Criminal Law ans Criminology, 49, 296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, D. J. (2005). The effectiveness of the juvenile justice system. Criminal Justice, 5(2), 181–195.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, D. J. (2006). Social inclusion and early desistance from crime. Report Number 12 of the Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime. Edinburgh, Scotland: Center for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh, Old College.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, D. A., & Gartin, P. R. (1989). Specifying specific deterrence: The influence of arrest on future criminal activity. American Sociological Review, 54, 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, L. G., & Akers, R. L. (1993). A comparison of recidivism of Florida’s Community Control and prison: A five year survival analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(3), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2002). The effect of imprisonment on recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology, 40(2), 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tanner, J., Davies, S., & O’Grady, B. (1999). Whatever happened to yesterday’s rebels? Longitudinal effects of youth delinquency on education and employment. Social Problems, 46(2), 250–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas, C.W. (1977). The effect of legal sanctions on juvenile delinquency: A comparision of the labeling and deterrence perspectives. Unpublished report, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
  85. Thomas, C. W., & Bishop, D. M. (1984). The effects of formal and informal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal analysis of labeling and deterrence theories. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1222–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thornberry, T. P. (1971). Punishment and crime: The effect of legal dispositions on subsequent criminal behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  87. Thornberry, T. P., & Christenson, R. L. (1984). Unemployment and criminal involvement: An investigation of reciprocal causal structures. American Sociological Review, 49, 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thorsel, B. A., & Klemke, L. W. (1972). The labeling process: Reinforcement and deterrent. Law and Society Review, 6, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tittle, C. R. (1969). Crime rates and legal sanctions. Social Problems, 16, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tittle, C. R. (1980). Social control: A survey of the foundations of order. The Southern Sociologist, 11(4), 14–15.Google Scholar
  91. Tittle, C. R., & Logan C. H. (1973). Sanctions and deviance: Evidence and remaining questions. Law and Society Review, 7(3), 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tittle, C. R., & Rowe, A. R. (1974). Certainty of arrest and crime rates: A further test of the deterrence hypothesis. Social Forces, 52, 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Turner, S., & Petersilia, J. (1992). Focusing on high-risk parolees: An experiment to reduce commitments to the Texas Department of Corrections. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29(1), 34–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vigil, J. D. (1995). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in southern California. In Klein, Maxson, & Miller, (Eds.), The modern gang reader. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  95. Waldfogel, J. (1994). The effect of criminal conviction on income and the ‘trust reposed in the workmen.’ Journal of Human Resources, 29, 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  97. Waldfogel, J. (1994). The effect of criminal conviction on income and the ‘trust reposed in the workmen.’ Journal of Human Resources, 29, 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulder
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyColorado State UniversityFort Collins

Personalised recommendations