Research Design and Methods

  • Nancy Law
  • Allan Yuen
  • Robert Fox


In recent years, various educational researchers and theorists have promoted the study of educational institutions or systems as ecosystems (e.g., Bransford, Slowinski, Vye, & Mosborg, 2008; Davis, 2008; Lemke & Sabelli, 2008). The ecosystem provides a framework for studying educational change because it highlights the hierarchical relationship between components in a nested structure, for example, classrooms are nested in schools, and schools are nested in regional districts and educational systems. All are interdependent and interconnected elements in the educational ecosystem. However, empirical studies in education adopting such a framework are still rare. A notable example is Zhao and Frank’s (2003) study of computer use in four school districts in the United States. They explicitly designed their study according to a framework in which computer use is seen as one invasive species in the education ecosystem. Using a survey to collect their data, Zhao and Frank explored the adoption of ICT in the four school districts at classroom, school, and district levels, and found significant relationships between different statistical parameters based on a theoretical model of the interrelationships among various elements in the educational ecosystem.


Pedagogical Practice Organizational Learning Case Study Research Environmental Niche Pedagogical Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adelman, C., Jenkins, D., & Kemmis, S. (Eds.). (1983). Rethinking case study: Notes from the Second Cambridge Conference. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bransford, J., Slowinski, M., Vye, N., & Mosborg, S. (2008). The learning sciences, technology and designs for educational systems: Some thoughts about change. In J. Visser & M. Visser-Valfrey (Eds.), Learners in a changing learning landscape: Reflections from a dialogue on new roles and expectations (pp. 37–67). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, N. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. M. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kozma, R. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  6. Law, N., Kankaanranta, M., & Chow, A. (2005). Technology-supported educational innovations in Finland and Hong Kong: A tale of two systems. Human Technology, 1(2), 176–201.Google Scholar
  7. Lemke, J., & Sabelli, N. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Milligan, G. W. (1981). A review of Monte Carlo tests of cluster analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morey, L. C., Blashfield, R. K., & Skinner, H. A. (1983). A comparison of cluster analysis techniques within a sequential validation framework. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, L. M. (Ed.). (1978). An evolving logic of participant observation: Educational ethnography and other case studies. Itasca: Peacock.Google Scholar
  14. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Stake, R. (1981). Case study methodology: An epistemological advocacy. Paper presented at the Minnesota Evaluation Conference, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  16. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Yuen, H. K., Fox, B., & Law, N. (2004). Curriculum innovations and multi-level e-leadership requirements: Putting research into practice. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 1(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  19. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations