Changing Leadership Roles in Changing Times



Leadership in its various forms is recognized as a key factor in any reform process. Building on the work presented in the previous chapters, we consider, in this chapter, leadership as an essential component of successful technology-supported curriculum and pedagogical innovation. We pay particular attention to a concept of leadership that goes beyond the traditional roles and responsibilities of the principal and the senior management team to encompass multilevel conceptions of leadership.


Education System Good Practice Boundary Span Classroom Level Innovative Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. APEC Education Foundation. (2009). White paper on APEC Education Foundation 1997–2008. Seoul, Korea: APEC Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). Complexity rising: From human beings to human civilization, a complexity profile. In Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Oxford, UK: UNESCO, EOLSS.Google Scholar
  4. Bransford, J., Slowinski, M., Vye, N., & Mosborg, S. (2008). The learning sciences, technology and designs for educational systems: Some thoughts about change. In J. Visser & M. Visser-Valfrey (Eds.), Learners in a changing learning landscape: Reflections from a dialogue on new roles and expectations (pp. 37–67). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, N. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. M. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Boston: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  7. EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (2004). Empowering learning and teaching with information technology. Retrieved from index.aspx?langno=1&nodeID=2497
  8. Engeström, Y. (2005). Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed., pp. 157–176). Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581–584.Google Scholar
  10. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  12. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fullan, M., Cuttress, C., & Kilcher, A. (2005). Forces for leaders of change. Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 54–58.Google Scholar
  14. Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crévola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.Google Scholar
  15. Graetz, F. (2000). Strategic change leadership. Management Decision, 38(8), 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, K. Seashore-Louis, G. Furman-Brown, P. Gronn, W. Mulford, & K. Riley (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 697–734). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1988). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). Seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8–13.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Democratic leadership for school improvement in challenging contexts. Paper presented at the the International Congress on School Effectiveness and Improvement, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  22. Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hopkins, D., & Levin, B. (2000). Government policy and school development. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson, B., & Kelley, C. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192.Google Scholar
  25. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Louis, K. S. (2006). Organizing for school change. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  28. Michigan Institute of Technology Sloan Management. (2004). Distibuted leadership model. Retrieved from
  29. Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2003). Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2009). Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (2nd ed.). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Sergiovanni, T. (2001). Leadership: What’s in it for schools? London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  32. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stein, M., & Coburn, C. (2008). Architectures for learning: A comparative analysis of two urban school districts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 583–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallace, M. (2002). Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1–5.Google Scholar
  37. West, M. (2000). Supporting school improvement: Observations on the inside, reflections from the outside. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuen, H. K., Fox, B., & Law, N. (2004). Curriculum innovations and multi-level e-leadership requirements: Putting research into practice. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 1(1), 11–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations