Advertisement

Linkages between Biometrics and Forensic Science

  • Damien Dessimoz
  • Christophe Champod

Keywords

Facial Image Short Tandem Repeat Crime Scene Forensic Science Speaker Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. J. Adams. The diversity of adult dental patterns in the united states and the implications for personal identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48:497–503, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Aitken and F. Taroni. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Alberink and A. Ruifrok. Performance of the FearID earprint identification system. Forensic Science International, 166:145–154, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Alexander. Forensic Automatic Speaker Recognition using Bayesian Interpretation and Statistical Compensation for Mismatched Conditions. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Alexander, D. Dessimoz, F. Botti, and A. Drygajlo. Aural and automatic forensic speaker recognition in mismatched conditions. International Journal of Speech, Language and Law, 12(2):214–234, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ANSI/NIST. ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2000 Data Format for the Interchange of Fingerprint, Facial, Scar Mark and Tattoo (SMT). American National Standard Institute -National Institute of Technology, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Anthonioz, A. Aguzzi, A. Girod, N. Egli, and O. Ribaux. Potential use of fingerprint in forensic intelligence: Crime scene linking. Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych -Problems of Forensic Sciences, 51:166–170, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Asai, Y. Kato, Y. Hoshino, and K. Kiji. Automatic fingerprint identification. In SPIE -Imaging Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, volume 182, pages 49–56, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Battley. Single Finger Prints. H. M. Stationery Ofice, London, 1930.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Berry and D. A. Stoney. The history and development of fingerprinting. In R. E. Gaensslen, editor, Advances in Fingerprint Technology, pages 1–40. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Bertillon. La Photographie Judiciaire. Gauthier-Villars et fils, Paris, 1890.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Bertillon. Identification Anthropom’etrique et Instructions Signalètiques. Imprimerie administrative, Melun, 1893.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Blain. Automated palm identification. Fingerprint Whorld, 28:102–107, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. M. Bolle, J. H. Connell, S. Pankanti, N. K. Ratha, and A. W. Senior. Guide to Biometrics. Springer-Verlag, New-York, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. H. Bolt, F. S. Cooper, D. M. Green, S. L. Hamlet, J. G. McKnight, J. M. Pickett, O. Tosi, B. D. Underwood, and D. L. Hogan. On the Theory and Practice of Voice Identification. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C., 1979.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. F. Bonastre, F. Bimbot, L. J. Boe, J. P. Campbell, D. A. Reynolds, and I. Magrin-Chagnolleau. Person authentication by voice: A need for caution. In Proceedings of Eurospeech 2003, pages 33–36, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. M. Brislawn, J. N. Bradley, R. J. Onyshczak, and T. Hopper. The FBI compression standard for digitized fingerprint images. In Proceedings of the SPIE, volume 2847, pages 344–355, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Budowle, R. Chakraborty, G. Carmody, and K. L. Monson. Source attribution of a forensic DNA profile. Forensic Science Communications, 2(3):, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. M. Butler. Forensic DNA Typing. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Champod. Identification/Individualization: Overview and meaning of ID. In Jay M. Siegel, Geofirey C. Knupfer, and Pekka J. Saukko, editors, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, pages 1077–1084. Academic Press, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Champod and I. W. Evett. Commentary on: Broeders, A. P. A. (1999) ’Some observations on the use of probability scales in forensic identification’, Forensic Linguistics, 6(2): 228-41. Forensic Linguistics, 7:238–243, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Champod and I. W. Evett. A probabilistic approach to fingerprint evidence. Journal of Forensic Identification, 51:101–122, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Champod, I. W. Evett, and B. Kuchler. Earmarks as evidence: A critical review. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(6):1275–1284, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Champod, C. Lennard, and P. Margot. Alphonse Bertillon and dactyloscopy. Journal of Forensic Identification, 43(6):604–625, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Champod, C. Lennard, P. Margot, and M. Stoilovic. Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Champod and D. Meuwly. The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition. Speech Communication, 31(2-3):193–203, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Chen and A. K. Jain. Dental biometrics: Alignment and matching of dental radiographs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27:1319–1326, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Cole. Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Cook, I. W. Evett, G. Jackson, P. J. Jones, and J. A. Lambert. A hierarchy of propositions: Deciding which level to address in casework. Science & Justice, 38:231–240, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Criminal Justice Information Services Division. Electronic Fingerprint Transmission Specifications CJIS-RS-0010 (V7). Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Washington, D.C., 1999.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. J. Dorion. Bitemark Evidence. Marcel Dekker, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Drygajlo. Forensic speaker recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(2):132–135, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Drygajlo, D. Meuwly, and A. Alexander. Statistical methods and bayesian interpretation of evidence in forensic automatic speaker recognition. In Eurospeech, pages 689–692, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    G. Fahmy, D. E. M. Nassar, E. Haj-Said, H. Chen, O. Nomir, J. Zhou, R. Howell, H. H. Ammar, M. Abdel-Mottaleb, and A. K. Jain. Toward an automated dental identification system. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 14(4):043018, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. Faulds. On the skin-furrows on the hands. Nature, 22:605, 1880.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. D. Foote. Fingerprint identification: A survey of present technology, automated applications and potential for future development. Criminal Justice Monography, V(2):1–33, 1974.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    L. A. Foreman, C. Champod, I. W. Evett, J. A. Lambert, and S. Pope. Interpreting DNA evidence: A review. International Statistical Review, 71:473–495, 2003.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    L. A. Foreman and I. W. Evett. Statistical analyses to support forensic interpretation for a new ten-locus STR profiling system. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 114:147–155, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    F. Galton. Finger Prints. Macmillian and Co., London, 1892.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    S. Gfroerer. Auditory instrumental forensic speaker recognition. In Proceedings of Eurospeech 2003, pages 705–708, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A. Drygajlo, D. Ramos-Castro, M. Garcia-Gomar, and J. Garcia-Ortega. Robust estimation, interpretation and assessment of likelihood ratios in forensic speaker recognition. Computer Speech and Language, 20:331–355, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. Hashimoto. De la classification á l’identification: Alphonse Bertillon (18531914) et l’anthropom’etrie judiciaire. M’emoire de DEA d’Epist’emologie, Histoire des sciences et des techniques, Universit’e de Nantes, 2003.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    W. Herschel. Skin furrows on the hand. Nature, 23:76, 1880.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A. J. Hoogstrate, C. van den Heuvel, and E. Huyben. Ear identification based on surveillance camera images. Science & Justice, 41:167–172, 2001.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. A. Huber and A. M. Headrick. Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1999.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. V. Iannarelli. Ear Identification. Paramont Publishing Company, Fremont, CA, 1989.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Interpol DNA Monitoring Expert Group. Interpol Handbook on DNA Data Exchange and Practice. International Criminal Police Organization, Lyon, 2001.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    M. Y. Iscan. Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: Potential and problems. In M. Y. Iscan and R. P. Helmer, editors, Forensic Analysis of the Skull: Craniofacial Analysis, Reconstruction, and Identification, pages 57–70 Wiley-Liss, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    A. K. Jain and H. Chen. Matching of dental X-Ray images for human identification. Pattern Recognition, 37:1519–1532, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    P. L. Kirk. The ontogeny of criminalistics. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 54:235–238, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    D. Klug, J. L. Peterson, and D. A. Stoney. Automated fingerprint identification systems: Their acquisition, management, performance and organizational impact. Report, National Institute of Justice, 1992.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    P. Komarinski. Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS). Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H. J. Kunzel. Current approaches to forensic speaker recognition. In Proceedings of the 1st ESCA Workshop on Speaker Recognition, Identification and Verification, pages 135–141, Martigny, Switzerland, 1994.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    H. J. Kunzel and J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez. Combining automatic and phonetic-acoustic speaker recognition techniques for forensic applications. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pages 1619–1622, Barcelona, Spain, 2003.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Q. Y. Kwan. Inference of Identity of Source. Phd thesis, Department of Forensic Science - University of California, Berkeley, 1977.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. J. Leadbetter. The use of automated fingerprint identification systems to process, search and identify palm prints and latent palm marks. Journal of Forensic Identification, 49:18–36, 1999.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    C. Liu and H. Wechsler. Face recognition. In J. L. Wayman, A. K. Jain, D. Maltoni, and D. Maio, editors, Biometric Systems: Technology, Design and Performance Evaluation, pages 97–114. Springer-Verlag, London, 2005.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    E. Locard. L’Identification des R’ecidivistes. A. Maloine, Paris, 1909.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    E. Locard. L’Enquête Criminelle et les Méthodes Scientifiques. Ernst Flammarion, Paris, 1920.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    K. V. Mardia, A. Coombes, J. Kirkbride, A. Linney, and J. L. Bowie. On statistical problems with face identification from photographs. Journal of Applied Statistics, 23(6):655–675, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    R. Marquis, M. Schmittbuhl, W. D. Mazzella, and F. Taroni. Quantification of the shape of handwritten characters: A step to objective discrimination between writers based on the study of the capital character o. Forensic Science International, 150:23–32, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    D. Meuwly. Voice analysis. In J. M. Siegel, G. C. Knupfer, and P. J. Saukko, editors, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, pages 1413–1421. Academic Press, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    D. Meuwly. Reconnaissance de Locuteurs en Sciences Forensiques: l’Apport d’une Approche Automatique. PhD thesis, Universit’e de Lausanne, 2001.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    R. T. Moore. Automatic fingerprint identification systems. In H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, editors, Advances in Fingerprint Technology, pages 163–191. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New-York, 1991.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    National DNA Database. The national DNA database, annual report 20042005. Annual report, ACPO, 2006.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    C. Neumann, C. Champod, R. Puch-Solis, N. Egli, A. Anthonioz, and A. Bromage-Grifiths. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(1):54–64, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    C. Neumann, C. Champod, R. Puch-Solis, N. Egli, A. Anthonioz, D. Meuwly, and A. Bromage-Grifiths. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(6):1255–1266, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    F. Nolan. Speaker identification evidence: its forms, limitations, and roles. In Proceedings of the conference “Law and Language: Prospect and Retrospect”, Levi (Finnish Lapland), 2001.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    O. Nomir and M. Abdel-Mottaleb. A system for human identification from X-ray dental radiographs. Pattern Recognition, 8:1295–1305, 2005.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    C. Peacock, A. Goode, and A. Brett. Automatic forensic face recognition from digital images. Science & Justice, 44(1):29–34, 2004.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    P. W. Pfefierli. Rapid -Response -AFIS. In J. Almog and E. Springer, editors, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fingerprint Detection and Identification, pages 225–256, Ne’urim, Israel, 1996.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    P. J. Phillips, W. T. Scruggs, A. J. O’Toole, P. J. Flynn, K. W. Bowyer, C. L. Schott, and M. Sharpe. FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), March 29 2007.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Police IT Organisation. Part 1: Identification roadmap 2005-2020 -Biometrics technology roadmap for person identification within the police service. Report, Police IT Organisation, 2005.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    J. A. Ratkovic. Increasing eficiency in the criminal justice system: the use of new technology for criminal identification and latent print processing. The rand paper series, The Rand Corporation, 1980.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    R. A. Reiss. Portrait Parl’e. Th. Sack, Lausanne, 2nd edition, 1914.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    P. Rose. Forensic Speaker Identification. Taylor & Francis London, London, New-York, 2002.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    A. A. Ross, K. Nandakumar, and A. K. Jain. Handbook of Multibiometrics. Springer, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    R. M. Royall. Statistical Evidence -A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman Hall, London, 1997.MATHGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    T. Ruggles, S. Thieme, and D. Elman. Automatic fingerprint identification systems I. North American Morpho System. In H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, editors, Advances in Fingerprint Technology, pages 211–226. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New-York, 1991.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    G. N. Rutty and A. Abbas. Could earprint identification be computerisedfi An illustrated proof of concept paper. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 119:335–343, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    M. J. Saks and J. J. Koehler. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309:892–895, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    M. J. Saks and D. M. Risinger. Science and nonscience in the courts: Daubert meets handwriting identification expertise. Iowa Law Review, 82:21–74, 1996.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    C. Sannié. Alphonse Bertillon et la dactyloscopie. L’afiaire Schefier. Revue Internationale de Police Criminelle, 5(41):255–262, 1950.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    L. Schomaker and M. Bulacu. Automatic writer identification using connected-component contours and edge-based features of upper-case western script. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 26:787–798, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    S. N. Srihari, M. J. Beal, K. Bandi, V. Shah, and P. Krishnamurthy. A statistical model for writer verification. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pages 1105–1109, 2005.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    S. N. Srihari, S.-H. Cha, H. Arora, and S. Lee. Individuality of handwriting. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47:1–17, 2002.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    D. A. Stoney. Measurement of fingerprint individuality. In H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, editors, Advances in Fingerprint Technology, pages 327–387. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    D. Sweet and I. A. Pretty. A look at forensic dentistry -part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. British Dental Journal, 190:359–366, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    F. Taroni, C. Champod, and P. Margot. Forerunners of bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics Journal, 38:183–200, 1998.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    R. Thiebault. Automatic process for automated fingerprint identification. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation of Population Register Systems, volume 1, pages 207–226, 1967.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Science of Fingerprints. U.S. Government Printing Ofice, Washington DC, 1984.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    C. van der Lugt. Earprint Identification. Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie, Gravenhage, 2001.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    M. van Erp, L. Vuurpijl, K. Franke, and L. Schomaker. The WANDA measurement tool for forensic document examination. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 16:103–118, 2004.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    P. Vanezis and C. Brierley. Facial image comparison of crime suspects using video superimposition. Science & Justice, 36(1):27–34, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    P. Vanezis, D. Lu, J. Cockburn, A. Gonzalez, G. McCombe, O. Trujillo, and M. Vanezis. Morphological classification of facial features in adult Caucasian males based on an assessment of photographs of 50 subjects. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41(5):786–791, 1996.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    J. Vucetich. Dactyloscopia comparada: El nuevo sistema argentino. Jacobo Peuser, La Plata, Argentina, 1904.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    S. J. Walsh, C. M. Triggs, and J. S. Buckleton. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation: Methods and Interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    R. Williams and P. Johnson. Forensic DNA databasing : A european perspective. Interim report, School of Applied Social Sciences, University of Durham, June 2005.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    F. G. Wood. Automatic fingerprint identification systems II. De La Rue Printrak system. Technical report, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    M. Yoshino. Conventional and novels methods for facial-image identification. Forensic Science Review, 16(2):104–114, 2004.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    J. Zhou and M. Abdel-Mottaleb. A content-based system for human identification based on bitewing dental X-ray images. Pattern Recognition, 38:2132– 2142, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damien Dessimoz
    • 1
  • Christophe Champod
    • 1
  1. 1.Forensic Science Institute, School of Criminal Sciences, Batochime - Quartier Sorge, University of Lausanne1015 Lausanne-DorignySwitzerland

Personalised recommendations