Skip to main content

The Data Fit the Model but the Model is Wrong: Kepler and the Structure of the Cosmos

  • Chapter
Book cover Quirky Sides of Scientists

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • David Topper, “The Neutrino and the Sydney Opera House,” Leonardo 30, No. 2 (1997), pp. 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler’s Mysterium Cosmographicum has been translated as The Secret of the Universe, by A.M. Duncan (New York: Abaris Books, 1981), material quoted from pp. 63–69, 105, and 157. I should point out that this is a translation of the second revised edition of 1621. See also, J.V. Field, Kepler’s Geometrical Cosmology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), and Eric Aiton, “Johannes Kepler and the ‘Mysterium Cosmographicum,”’ Sudhoffs Archiv, vol. 61, No. 2 (1977), pp. 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Harmonice Mundi by Kepler has been translated as The Harmony of the World, by E.J. Aiton, A.M. Duncan, and J.V. Field (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1997), material is quoted from pp. 406–407 and 424.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the revival of ancients texts see Paul Lawrence Rose, “Renaissance Italian Methods of Drawing the Ellipse and Related Curves,” Physis, 12 (1970), pp. 371–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • On Bode’s law see Michael Hoskin (ed.), The Cambridge Illustrated History of Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • For a derivation of the equation for the empty focus, see my “Kepler’s Other ‘Law’ of Planetary Motion,” European Journal of Physics, 12 (1991), pp. 49–50. On Copernicus’s retention of the equant, see Noel M. Swerdlow, “An Essay on Thomas Kuhn’s First Scientific Revolution, The Copernican Revolution,Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 148, No.1 (March, 2004), pp. 64–120, appendix 2 (pp. 111–115), and Otto Neugebauer, Astronomy and History: Selected Essays (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983), pp. 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • On Galileo’s father’s music theory, see Stillman Drake, Galileo Studies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1970), Chapter 2 (“Vincenzio Galilei and Galileo”). On the included plane experiment: “The Role of Music in Galileo’s Experiments,” Scientific American 232 (June, 1975), pp. 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Topper, D.R. (2007). The Data Fit the Model but the Model is Wrong: Kepler and the Structure of the Cosmos. In: Quirky Sides of Scientists. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71019-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics