Part of the Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics book series (UTM)


This chapter presents a discussion of the means, primarily electrical, by which the parts of an organism communicate with each other. We will see that this communication is not like that of a conducting wire; rather, it involves a self-propagating change in the ionic conductance of the cell membrane. The nerve cell, or neuron, has an energy-requiring, steady-state condition in which the interior of the cell is at a negative potential relative to the exterior. Information transfer takes the form of a disruption of this steady-state condition, in which the polarity of a local region of the membrane is transiently reversed. This reversal is self-propagating, and is called an action potential. It is an all-or-none phenomenon: Either it occurs in full form or it doesn’t occur at all. Neurons are separated by a synaptic cleft, and interneuronal transmission of information is chemically mediated. An action potential in a presynaptic neuron triggers the release of a neurotransmitter chemical that diffuses to the postsynaptic cell. The sum of all the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters that reach a postsynaptic cell in a short period of time determines whether a new action potential is generated.


Postsynaptic Neuron Temporal Summation Presynaptic Neuron Giant Axon Potassium Conductance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Suggested Further Reading

  1. [1]
    Neuronal biology and physiology: E. N. Marieb, Human Anatomy and Physiology, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Redwood City, CA, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Neuronal biology: P. H. Raven and G. B. Johnson, Biology, Mosby/Year Book, 3rd ed., St. Louis, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Neuronal biophysics: F. R. Hallett, P. A. Speight, and R. H. Stinson, Introductory Biophysics, Halstead/Wiley, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Molecular biology of neurons: B. Alberts, D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and J. D. Watson, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd ed., Garland, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Logio, J. Physiol., 116 (1952), 449–472.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, Components of membrane conductance in the giant axon of Logio, J. Physiol. 116 (1952), 473–496.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Logio, J. Physiol., 116 (1952), 497–506.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), 500–544.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: A. L. Hodgkin, A. F. Huxley, and B. Katz, Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Logio, J. Physiol., 116 (1952), 424–448.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hodgkin–Huxley experiments: R. V. Churchill and J. W. Brown, Fourier Series and Boundary Value Problems, 4th ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Fitzhugh–Nagumo equations: R. Fitzhugh, Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J., 1 (1961), 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fitzhugh–Nagumo equations: J. S. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yoshizawa, An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon, Proc. Inst. Radio Engineers, 20 (1962), 2061–2071.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations