Skip to main content

Evaluation of Empowerment and Effectiveness

Universal Concepts?

  • Chapter
Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adelson, N. (2005). The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in aboriginal Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(S45), Suppl 2:S45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of American Institute Planners, 35(4), 216–224 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, M., Rugh, J. & Mabry, L. (2006). RealWorld Evaluation. Working Under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier, M., Arteau, M. & Papin, C. (2005). Palabres sur le pouvoir d’agir. Outil d’accompagnement sur l’empowerment. Québec: CCISD Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billeter, J-F. (2006). Contre François Jullien. Paris: Allia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisset, S., Cargo, M., Delormier, T., Macaulay, A. C. & Potvin, L. (2004). Legitimizing diabetes as a community health issue: A case analysis of an aboriginal community in Canada. Health Promotion International, 19(3), 317–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, W. (1993). Evaluating participation in community programs: an empowerment paradigm. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 8(1), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A. I., Bodstein, R. C., Hartz, Z. & Matida, A. H. (2004). Concepts and approaches in the evaluation of health promotion. Ciência & Saude Coletiva, 9(3), 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, F. & Guiset, A.-L. (2005). The Assessment of Hospital performance: Collected Background Papers, R05–04. Montréal GRIS-Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J. B. (2005). Will the real empowerment evaluation please stand up? A critical friend perspective. In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice(pp 183–208). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P. (1999). The stages approach to policy process: what has it done? Where is it going? In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Theoretical lenses on public policy (pp. 19–32). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delormier, T., Cargo, M., Kirby, R. & McComber, A. (2003). Activity implementation as a reflection of living in balance: The Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. Pimatziwin: a journal of aboriginal and indigenous community health, 1(1), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupéré, S., Ridde, V., Carroll, S., O’Neill, M., Rootman, I. & Pederson, A. (2007). Conclusion: the rhizome and the tree. In M. O’Neill, A. Pederson, I. Rootman & D. S. (Eds.), Health Promotion in Canada: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyssalet, J. M. (2006). Communication personnelle, Montréal, aoét 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2001). Le culturalisme pratique de la santé publique. Critique d’un sens commun. In J. P. Dozon & D. Fassin (Eds.), Critique de la santé publique. Une approche anthropologique (pp. 181–208). Paris: Balland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, S. (2001). La pratique participative en santé publique: l’émergence d’un paradigme. Unpublished PhD Santé publique option promotion de la santé, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudreau, G. (2006). Exploring the connection between aboriginal women’s hand drumming and health promotion (mino-bimaadiziwin). Edmonton: University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W. & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof, 29(1), 126–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1989). Les trois écologies. Paris: Èditions Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F., Spire, A., Field, M., & Hirsch, E. (2002). La philosophie est essentielle à l’existence humaine. La Tour d’Aigues: L’Aube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrunn, B. (2005). La performance, une nouvelle idéologie?: critique et enjeux: La decouverte. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, M. D., Carroll, S. & O’Neill, M. (2004). Vers un modéle d’évaluation de l’efficacité des interventions communautaires en promotion de la santé: compte-rendu de quelques développements nord-américains récents. Promotion & Education, Spec no 1, 17– 21, 49 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard, A. (2006). Le regard d’Albert Jacquard. Emission de France Culture le 19 Avril 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, F. (2005). Conférence sur l’efficacité. Paris: PUF-Centre Marcel Granet. Institut de la pensée contemporaine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2007). Health promotion: the rhizome. In M. O’Neill, A. Pederson, I. Rootman & D. S. (Eds.), Health Promotion in Canada: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bossé, Y., Dufort, F. & Vandette, L. (2004). L’évaluation de l’empowerment des personnes: développement d’une mesure d’indices psychosociologiques du pouvoir d’agir (MIPPA). Revue canadienne de santé mentale communautaire, 23(1), 91–114 .

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M., Nguyen, V.-K. & Zarowsky, C. (2005). Global and Local Perspectives on Population Health. In J. Heymann, C. Hertzman, M. L. Barer & R. G. Evans (Eds.), Healthier Societies. From Analysis to Action (pp. 58–82). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. & Anderson, L. M. (2001). What counts as evidence: issues and debates. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. V. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives (pp. 63–81): WHO Regional Publications. European Series, No. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2004). La méthode 6. Ethique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe (Nouv. ed.). Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninacs, W. A. (2002). Types et processus d’empowerment dans les initiatives de développement économique communautaire au Québec.PhD Thesis, Ecole de service social. Québec: Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based Policy. A Realist Perspective. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. A. & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Beyond the individual: toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment. Am J Community Psychol, 34(1–2), 129–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pluye, P., Potvin, L. & Denis, J. L. (2004). Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluye, P., Potvin, L., Denis, J. L., Pelletier, J. & Mannoni, C. (2005). Program sustainability begins with the first events. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, L., Gendron, S. & Bilodeau, A. (2006). Três posturas ontológicas concernentes à natureza dos programas de saúde: implicaçâes para a avaliaçâo. In M. Bosi & F. J. Mercado (Eds.), Avaliaç Qualitativa de programas de saude. Enfoques emergentes (pp. 65–86). Petropolis, Brazil: Vozes Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, L., Haddad, S. & Frohlich, C. (2001). Beyond process and outcome evaluation: A comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. V. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives (pp. 45–62): WHO Regional Publications. European Series, No. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdey, A. F., Adhikari, G. B., Robinson, S. A. & Cox, P. W. (1994). Participatory health development in rural Nepal: clarifying the process of community empowerment. Health Educ Q, 21(3), 329–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Racine, S. & Leroux, R. (2006). L’animation de groupe: une pratique à redécouvrir afin de développer le pouvoir d’agir des individus! Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, 21(3), 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridde, V. (2006). Suggestions d’amélioration d’un cadre conceptual de l’évaluation participative. Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, 21(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridde V. (2007). Reducing Social Inequalities in Health: Public Health, Community Health or Health Promotion? Promotion & Education. XIV (i2): in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridde, V., Baillargeon, J., Ouellet, P. & Roy, S. (2003). L’évaluation participative de type empowerment: une stratégie pour le travail de rue. Service Social, vol 50(1), 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridde, V., Pluye, P. & Queuille, L. (2006). Evaluer la pérennité des programmes de santé publique: un outil et son application en Haïti. Revue d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, 54(5), 421–431.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridde, V. & Queuille, L. (2006). Evaluer l’empowerment: tentative d’application d’un cadre d’analyse en Haïti. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 21(3), 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, S. B. (2003). A framework linking community empowerment and health equity: it is a matter of CHOICE. Journal of Health Population Nutrition, 21(3), 168–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., Hyndman, B., McQueen, D. V., Potvin, L., Springett, J., et al. (Eds.). (2001). Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives: WHO Regional Publications. European Series, No. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saillant, F. (2004). Constructivisme, identités flexibles et communautés vulnérables. In F. Saillant, M. Clément & C. Gaucher (Eds.), Identités, vulnérabilités, communautés (pp. 19–42). Québec: Editions Nota bene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N. (2002). Empowerment to reduce health disparities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30, 72–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ridde, V., Delormier, T., Goudreau, G. (2007). Evaluation of Empowerment and Effectiveness. In: McQueen, D.V., Jones, C.M. (eds) Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70973-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70974-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics