Advertisement

Healthy Settings

Building Evidence for the Effectiveness of Whole System Health Promotion – Challenges and Future Directions
  • Mark Dooris
  • Blake Poland
  • Lloyd Kolbe
  • Evelyne de Leeuw
  • Douglas S. McCall
  • Joan Wharf-Higgins

Keywords

Health Promotion School Health Setting Approach Critical Realism Healthy City 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 11–18.Google Scholar
  2. Ashton, J. (1988). Rising to the challenge. Health Service Journal, 20 October, 1232–1234.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Health Promoting Schools Association (2002). National framework for health promoting schools, 2002–2003. http://www.ahpsa.org.au/files/framework.pdf accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  4. Barí,L. (1993). The settings approach implications for policy and strategy. Journal of the Institute of Health Education, 31, 17–24.Google Scholar
  5. BarićL. (1994). Health promotion and health education in practice. Module 2: The organisational model. Altrincham: Barns Publications.Google Scholar
  6. BarićL. & BarićL. (1995) Health promotion and health education. Module 3: Evaluation, quality, audit. Altrincham: Barns Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Barnekow Rasmussen, V. & Rivett, D. (2000). The European network of health promoting schools an alliance of health, education and democracy. Health Education, 100, 61–67.Google Scholar
  8. Bartholemew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. H. (2006). Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach (2nd Ed.). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar
  9. Baum, F. (1995). Researching public health: beyond the qualitative and quantitative method debate. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 459–468.Google Scholar
  10. Bessel, T., McDonald, S., Silagy, C., Anderson, J., Hiller, J., & Sansom, L. (2002). Do internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expectations, 5, 28–37.Google Scholar
  11. Best, A., Stokols, D., Green, L. W., Leischow, S., Holmes, B., & Buchholz, K. (2003). An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 168–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bolam, B., McLean, C., Pennington, A., & Gillies, P. (2006). Using new media to build social capital for health. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 297–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Breuker, G. & Schroer, A. (2000). Settings 1 – health promotion in the workplace. In International Union for Health Promotion and Education The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. Shaping public health in a new Europe. Part two: Evidence book (pp. 98–109). Brussels – Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC. 2nd edition. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.Google Scholar
  15. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education, Vol. 3, 2nd Ed., (pp. 1643–1647). Oxford: Pergamon Press/Elseiver Science.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.Google Scholar
  18. Capra, F. (1983). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
  19. Colquhoun, D. (2006). Complexity and the health promoting school. In S. Clift & B.Bruun Jensen (Eds.), The health promoting school: International advances in theory, evaluation and practice (pp. 41–53). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish University of Education Press.Google Scholar
  20. Connell, J. P. & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. In K. Fulbright-Anderson, A. C. Kubisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Volume 2: Theory, measurement, and analysis, (pp. 15–44). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Connelly, J. (2001). Critical realism and health promotion: Effective practice needs an effective theory. Health Education Research, 16, 115–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Costongs, C. & Springett, J. (1997). Joint working and the production of a city health plan: The Liverpool experience. Health Promotion International, 12, 9–19.Google Scholar
  23. Department of Health, Social Services & Public Safety (2002). Investing for health. Belfast: DHSSPS.Google Scholar
  24. Deschesnes, M., Martin, C., & Jomphe Hill, A. (2003). Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: How to achieve broader implementation? Health Promotion International, 18, 387–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dooris, M (2001). The “health promoting university”: A critical exploration of theory and practice. Health Education, 101, 51–60.Google Scholar
  26. Dooris, M. (2004). Joining up settings for health: a valuable investment for strategic partnerships? Critical Public Health, 14, 37–49.Google Scholar
  27. Dooris, M. (2006a). Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promotion International, 21, 55–65.Google Scholar
  28. Dooris, M. (2006b). Health promoting settings: future directions. Promotion & Education, 13, 4–6.Google Scholar
  29. Dooris, M. & Hunter, D. (2007). Organisations and settings for public health. In S. Handsley, C. Lloyd, J. Douglas, S. Earle & S. Spurr (Eds.),Policy and practice in promoting public health. London: Sage/Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  30. Dooris, M., Dowding, G., Thompson, J., & Wynne, C. (1998). The settings-based approach to health promotion. In A. Tsouros, G. Dowding, J. Thompson, & M. Dooris (Eds.), Health promoting universities: Concept, experience and framework for action (pp. 18–28). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  31. Eakin, J., Robertson, A., Poland, B., Coburn, D. & Edwards, R. (1996). Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promotion International. 11, 157–165.Google Scholar
  32. Eng, T. (2002). eHealth research and evaluation: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 267–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Evers, K. (2006). eHealth promotion: the use of the internet for health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 20, 1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. French, W. & Bell, C. (1999). Organisation development: Behavioural science interventions for organisation improvement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  36. Galea, G., Powis, B., & Tamplin, S. (2000). Healthy islands in the Western Pacific – international settings development. Health Promotion International, 15, 169–178.Google Scholar
  37. Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity – A platform for designing business architecture. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  38. Goodstadt, M. (2001). Part 3: Settings – introduction. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett, & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives (pp. 209–211). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  39. Green, L. W. & Kreuter, M. (2005). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach, 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Green, L. W., Poland, B. D., & Rootman, I. (2000). The settings approach to health promotion. In B. D. Poland, L. W. Green, & I. Rootman (Eds.), Settings for health promotion: Linking theory and practice (pp. 1–43). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Green, L. W., Richard, L. & Potvin, L. (1996). Ecological foundations of health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 270–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Groene, O. & Garcia-Barbero, M. (Eds.) (2005). Health promotion in hospitals: Evidence and quality management. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  43. Grossman, R. & Scala, K. (1993). Health promotion and organisational development: Developing settings for health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  44. Hirji, F. (2004). Freedom or folly? Canadians and the consumption of online health information. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 445–465.Google Scholar
  45. Honig, M. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: confronting complexity. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  46. Institute of Medicine (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  47. Jackson, N. & Waters, E. (2005) Guidelines: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Melbourne:Cochrane Collaboration – Cochrane Health Promotion and Public Health Field.Google Scholar
  48. Jewkes, R. & Murcott, A. (1998). Community representativeness: Representing the ѣommunityѿ Social Science and Medicine, 46, 843–858.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones, L. & Douglas, J. from 1st draft by Adams, L. (2002). The politics of health promotion. In L. Jones, M. Sidell, & J. Douglas (Eds.). The challenge of promoting health: Exploration and action (pp. 143–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  50. julnes, G., Mark, M., & Henry, G. (1998). Promoting realism in evaluation: Realistic evaluation and the broader context. Evaluation,4, 483–504.Google Scholar
  51. Kahan, B. & Goodstadt, M. (2001). The interactive domain model of best practices in health promotion: Developing and implementing a best practices approach to health promotion. Health Promotion Practice, 2, 43–67.Google Scholar
  52. Kegler, M. C., Twiss, J. M., & Look, V. (2000). Assessing community change at multiple levels: The genesis of an evaluation framework for the California Healthy Cities Project. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 760–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelly, P. (2005). Practical suggestions for community interventions using participatory action research. Public Health Nursing, 22(1), 65–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Koerin, B. (2003). The settlement house tradition: current trends and future concerns. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXX(2), 53–68.Google Scholar
  55. Kickbusch, I. (1995). An overview to the settings-based approach to health promotion. In T. Theaker & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Settings-based approach to health promotion: Report of an international working conference, 17–20 November 1993 (pp. 3–9). Welwyn Garden City: Hertfordshire Health Promotion.Google Scholar
  56. Kickbusch, I. (1996). Tribute to Aaron Antonovsky – “what creates health”? Health Promotion International, 11, 5–6.Google Scholar
  57. Kickbusch, I. (2003). The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 383–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kolbe, L. (2002). Education reform and the goals of modern school health programs. The State Education Standard: The Quarterly Journal of the National Association of State Boards of Education, 3, 4–11.Google Scholar
  59. Kolbe, L. (2005). A framework for school health programs in the 21st Century. Journal of School Health, 75, 226–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kolbe, L., Jones, J., Birdthistle, I., & Vince-Whitman, C. (2000). Building the capacity of schools to improve the health of nations. In C. E. Koop, C. E. Pearson, & M. R. Schwarz (Eds.), Critical Issues in Global Health (pp. 212–220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  61. Kolbe, L., Tirozzi, G., Marx, E., Bobbitt-Cooke, M., Riedel, S., Jones, J., & Schmoyer, M. (2005). Health programs for school employees: Improving quality of life, health & productivity. Promotion & Education, 12, 157–161.Google Scholar
  62. Lee, A., Cheng, F., & St Leger, L (2005). Evaluating health promoting schools in Hong Kong: the development of a framework. Health Promotion International ,20, 177–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Leeuw, E. de & Skovgaard, T. (2005). Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: problems with evidence generation and application. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1331–1341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Leung, M., Yen, I., & Minkler, M. (2004). Community based participatory research: A promising approach for increasing epidemiology–s relevance in the 21st century. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 499–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lister-Sharp, D., Chapman, S., Stewart-Brown, S., & Soden, A. (1999). Health promoting schools and health promotion in school: Two systematic reviews. Health Technology Assessment, 3(22).Google Scholar
  66. Lohrmann, D. (2006). Creating a healthy school using the healthy school report card. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  67. Lombardo, C. & Skinner, H. (2003–2004). “A virtual hug” Prospects for self-help online. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 2, 205–218.Google Scholar
  68. Lombardo, C., Zakus, D., & Skinner, H. (2002). Youth social action: Building a global latticework through informtion and communication technologies. Health Promotion International, 17, 363–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Lorence, D.P. & Greenberg, L. (2006). The zeitgeist of online health search: Implications for a consumer-centric health system. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 134–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Mackenzie, M. & Blamey, A. (2005). The practice and the theory: Lessons from the applications of a Theories of Change approach. Evaluation, 11, 151–168.Google Scholar
  71. Malpas, J. (2003). Bio-medical Topoi – the dominance of space, the recalcitrance of place, and the making of persons. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 2343–2351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. McIntyre, L., Belzer, E. G., Manchester, L., Blanchard, W., Officer, S., & Simpson, A. C. (1996) The Dartmouth health promotion study: A failed quest for synergy in school health promotion. Journal of School Health, 66, 132–137.Google Scholar
  73. McLaren, L. & Hawe, P. (2005). Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 6–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. McQueen, D. (2002). The evidence debate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 83–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Moore, K. & Lippman, L. (2004). What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  76. Moysés, S.J., Moysés, S.T., McCarthy, M., & Sheiham, A. (2006). Intra-urban differentials in child dental trauma in relation to Healthy Cities policies in Curitiba, Brazil. Health and Place, 12, 48–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Mũkhoma, W. & Flisher, A. (2004). Evaluations of health promoting schools: A review of nine studies. Health Promotion International, 19, 357–368.Google Scholar
  78. Mullen, P., Evans, D., Forster, J., Gottlieb, N., Kreuter, M., Moon, R., O’Rourke, T., & Stretcher, V. (1995). Settings as an important dimension in health education/promotion policy, programs, and research. Health Education Quarterly, 22, 329–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. National Health & Medical Research Council (1996). Effective school health promotion: towards health promoting schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  80. Nguyen, H., Carrieri-Kholman, V., Rankin, S., Slaugher, R., & Sulbarg, M. (2004). Supporting cardiac recovery through eHealth technology. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19, 200–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Norman, C. & Skinner, H. (2006). eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8, e9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Nutbeam, D. (1999). The challenge to provide ℌevidence“ in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 14, 99–101.Google Scholar
  83. Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health promotion effectiveness – the questions to be answered. In International Union for Health Promotion and Education The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. Shaping public health in a new Europe. Part two: Evidence book (pp. 1–11). Brussels – Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC. 2nd edition. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.Google Scholar
  84. O’Neill, M., Pederson, A., & Rootman, I. (2000). Health promotion in Canada: declining or transforming? Health Promotion International,15, 135–141.Google Scholar
  85. Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) (2005). Healthy municipalities, cities and communities: Evaluation recommendations for policymakers in the Americas. Washington: PAHO.Google Scholar
  86. Paton, K., Sengupta, S., & Hassan, L. (2005). Settings, systems and organisation development: the Healthy Living and Working Model. Health Promotion International, 20, 81–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction. RMP Methods Paper 2/2004 Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  89. Plsek, P.E. & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in healthcare. British Medical Journal, 323, 625–628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Poland, B., Frohlich, K., & Cargo, M. (2007). Context as a fundamental dimension of health promotion program evaluation. In L. Potvin, D. McQueen, L. Anderson, Z. Hartz, & L. de Salazar (Eds.), Health Promotion Effectiveness in Context: Issues and Perspectives from the Americas.Google Scholar
  91. Poland, B. (1996). Knowledge development and evaluation in, of, and for healthy community initiatives. Part I: Guiding principles. Health Promotion International, 11, 237–247.Google Scholar
  92. Pratt, J., Gordon, P., & Plamping, D. (1999). Working whole systems: Putting theory into practice in organizations. London: King’s Fund.Google Scholar
  93. Raphael, D. (2000) The question of evidence in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 15, 355–367.Google Scholar
  94. Restrepo, H.E., Llanos, G., Contrera, A., Rocabado, F., Gross, S., Suárez, J., & González, J. (1996). The PAHO/WHO experience: Healthy municipalities in Latin America. In C. Price & A. Tsouros (Eds.) Our cities, our future: Policies and action plans for health and sustainable development. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  95. Rowling, L. & Jeffreys, V. (2006). Capturing complexity: Integrating health and education research to inform health-promoting schools policy and practice. Health Education Research, 21, 705–718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Satterfield, D., Volansky, M., Caspersen, C., Engelgau, M., Bowman, B., Gregg, E., Geiss, L.S., Hosey, G.M., May, J., & Vinicor, F. (2003). Community-based lifestyle interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 26, 2643–2652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  98. Scottish Health Promoting Schools Unit. (2006). Health promoting schools. (http://www.healthpromotingschools.co.uk/index.asp accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  99. Senge P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  100. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday Press.Google Scholar
  101. Skinner, H., Biscope, S., & Poland, B. (2003). Quality of internet access: Barrier behind internet use statistics. Social Science and Medicine,57, 875–880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Skinner, H., Biscope, S., Poland, B., & Goldberg, E. (2003). How adolescents use technology for health information: Implications for health professionals from focus group studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5, e32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Squires, N & Strobl, J. (Eds.) (1996). Healthy prisons – a vision for the future. Report of the first international conference on healthy prisons, Liverpool, 24–27 March 1996. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
  104. St Leger, L. (1997). Health promoting settings: From Ottawa to Jakarta. Health Promotion International 12, 99–101.Google Scholar
  105. St Leger, L. (2006). Communication technologies and health promotion: Opportunities and challenges. Health Promotion International 21, 169–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. St Leger, L. & Nutbeam, D. (2000). Settings 2 – effective health promotion in schools. In International Union for Health Promotion and Education The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. Shaping public health in a new Europe. Part two: Evidence book (pp. 110–122). Brussels – Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC. 2nd edition. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.Google Scholar
  107. Stame, N. (2004). Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation, 10, 58–76.Google Scholar
  108. Steckler, A., McLeray, K., & Goodman R. (1992). Towards integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). What is the evidence on school health promotion in improving health or preventing disease and, specifically, what is the effectiveness of the health promoting schools approach? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. (Health Evidence Network Report http://www.who.dk/Document/E88185.pdf accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  110. Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 282–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Suggs, L.S. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in new technologies for health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 61–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Tones, K. (1997). Beyond the randomized controlled trial: a case for “udicial review”Health Education Research, 12, 1–4.Google Scholar
  113. Tones, K. & Green, J. (2004). Health promotion: planning and strategies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  114. Tsouros, A. (Ed.) (1991). World Health Organization healthy cities project: A project becomes a movement. Review of progress 1987–1990. Copenhagen:FADL Publishers/Milan: SOGESS.Google Scholar
  115. Tsouros, A.D. (1995). The WHO healthy cities project: State of the art and future plans. Health Promotion International, 10, 133–141.Google Scholar
  116. Tsouros, A.D., Dowding, G., Thompson, J., & Dooris, M. (Eds.) (1998). Health promoting universities: Concept, experience and framework for action. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  117. U.S. Centers for Disease Control. (2005). School health index: a self-assessment and planning guide. (http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/SHI/paper.htm accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  118. U.S. Centers for Disease Control. (2006a). Healthy schools, healthy youth. (http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/index.htm accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  119. U.S. Centers for Disease Control. (2006b). The school health policies and programs study. (http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/shpps/index.htm (accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  120. Wallerstein, N. (2006). What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  121. Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 41–56.Google Scholar
  122. Wellman, B., Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2002). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455.Google Scholar
  123. Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review (Jan–Feb), 139–145.Google Scholar
  124. Wenzel, E. (1997). A comment on settings in health promotion. Internet Journal of Health Promotion. (http://www.ldb.org/setting.htm accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  125. Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. (2006). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, Canada: Random House.Google Scholar
  126. Wharf Higgins, J. (1992). The healthy community movement in Canada. In B. Wharf (Ed.), Communities and social policy in Canada (pp. 151–189). Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
  127. Whitelaw, S., Baxendale, A., Bryce, C., Machardy, L., Young, I., & Witney, E. (2001). Settings based health promotion: A review. Health Promotion International, 16, 339–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Williams, G. H. (2003). The determinants of health: Structure, context and agency. Sociology of Health & Illness 25(3), 131–154.Google Scholar
  129. World Health Organization. (WHO) (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Adopted at an International Conference on Health Promotion – The Move Towards a New Public Health (co-sponsored by the Canadian Public Health Association, Health and Welfare Canada, and the World Health Organization), Nov 17–21, Ottawa, Canada. (http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  130. World Health Organization (WHO) (1991). Sundsvall statement on supportive environments for health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  131. World Health Organization (WHO) (1996). Health-promoting schools series 5: Regional guidelines. Development of health-promoting schools– A framework for action. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.Google Scholar
  132. World Health Organization (WHO) (1997a). Jakarta declaration on health promotion into the 21 st century . Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  133. World Health Organization (WHO) (1997b). Promoting health through schools. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Comprehensive School Health Education and Promotion. World Health Organization Technical Report Series, 870(i–vi), 1–93.Google Scholar
  134. World Health Organization (WHO) (1998a). Health promotion glossary. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  135. World Health Organization (WHO) (1998b). Health21: The health for all policy for the WHO European region – 21 targets for the 21st century. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  136. World Health Organization (WHO) (2002a). Integrated management of healthy settings at the district level. Report of an intercountry consultation. Gurgaon, India, 7–11 May 2001. New Delhi: WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia.Google Scholar
  137. World Health Organization (WHO) (2002b). Healthy cities initiative: Approaches and experience in the African region. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa.Google Scholar
  138. World Health Organization (WHO) (2004). Healthy marketplaces in the Western Pacific: Guiding future action. Applying a settings approach to the promotion of health in marketplaces. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.Google Scholar
  139. World Health Organization (WHO) (2005). Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world . Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  140. World Health Organization (WHO) (2006a). Healthy environments for children alliance inter-regional consultation: Improving children’s environmental health in settings – experiences and lessons for policies and action. Report of meeting held in Entebbe, Uganda from 29 November to 2 December 2005. Geneva: WHO (Healthy Environments for Children Alliance Secretariat).Google Scholar
  141. World Health Organization (WHO) (2006b) School health and youth health promotion. (http://www.who.int/school_youth_health/en/ accessed 06 October 2006).Google Scholar
  142. Ziglio, E., Hagard, S., & Griffiths, J. (2000). Health promotion development in Europe: Achievements and challenges. Health Promotion International, 15, 143–153.Google Scholar
  143. Zimmerman, B., Lindberg, C., & Plsek, P. (2001). Edgeware: Insights from complexity science for health care leaders, 2nd Ed. Irving, Texas: VHA Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Dooris
  • Blake Poland
  • Lloyd Kolbe
  • Evelyne de Leeuw
  • Douglas S. McCall
  • Joan Wharf-Higgins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations