Measurement and Effectiveness

Methodological Considerations, Issues and Possible Solutions
  • Stefano Campostrini


Health Promotion Abstract Concept Public Health Intervention Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Urban Sprawl 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baum, F. (1995). Researching public health: beyond the qualitative-quantitative method debate. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 459–468.Google Scholar
  2. Black, N. (1996). Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. British Medical Journal, 312, 1215–1218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blalock, H. (1979). Measurement and Conceptualization Problems: the major obstacle to integrating theory and research. American Sociological Review, 44, 881–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Box G. & Tiao G. (1975). Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problems, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 70–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BRFSS (2006). Scholar
  6. Bridle, C., Riemsma, R.P., Pattenden, J., Sowden, A.J., Mather, L, Watt, I.S.& Walker, A. (2005). Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behaviour interventions based on the transtheoretical model. Psychology and Health, 20, 283–301.Google Scholar
  7. Campostrini, S. (2003). Surveillance systems and data analysis, in D.V.McQueen& P.Puska (eds.) Global Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance, 47–55, New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Campostrini, S. (1996). Dynamic approaches to the study of behaviour. The continuous collection of data in comparison with panel surveys, Statistica Applicata, 8, 695–708.Google Scholar
  9. Campostrini, S., Holtzman, D., McQueen, D. V.& Boaretto, E. (2006). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Health Promotion Policy: Changes in the Law on Drinking and Driving in California. Health Promotion International, 21, 130–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campostrini, S.& McQueen, D.V. (2005). Institutionalization of social and behavioral risk factor surveillance as a learning system. Social and Preventive Medicine, 50 Suppl 1, S9–S15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dean, K. (1988). Issues in the development of health promotion indicators. Health Promotion International, 3, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Des Jarlais, D.C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N. and the TREND Group (2004). Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 361–366.Google Scholar
  13. De Vries, H., Weijts, W., Dijkstra, M.& Kok, G. (1992). The utilization of qualitative and quantitative data for health education program planning, implementation, and evaluation: a spiral approach. Health Education Quarterly 19, 101–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford, J. (1975). Paradigms and Fairy Tales. An Introduction to the Science of Meanings. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Gentry, E.M., Kalsbeek, W.D.& Hogelin, G.C., et al. (1985). The behavioral risk factor surveys. II design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1(6), 9–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B.&Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Greeenhalgh, T. (1997). Papers that summerise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analysis). British Medical Journal, 315, 672–675.Google Scholar
  18. Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. Jon Wiley& Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Heckman J., LaLonde R.& Smith J. (1999). “The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs” in O. Ashenfeltere D. Card (eds.), Hanbook of Labor Economics – Vol. 3A, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, N. & Waters, E. (2004), and the Guidelines for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions Taskforce. The challenges of systematically reviewing public health interventions. Journal of Public Health, 26, 303–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McQueen, D.V. (1996). Surveillance of health behavior. Current Issues of Public Health, 2, 51–55.Google Scholar
  22. McQueen, D.V. & Anderson, L.M. (2001). What counts as evidence: issues and debates, in Evaluation in health promotion,WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No.92.Google Scholar
  23. McQueen D. V.& Noack, H. (1998). Health promotion indicators. Health Promotion International, 3, 73–78.Google Scholar
  24. McQueen, D.V.& Puska, P. (Eds.) (2003). Global Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance,New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  25. McQueen, D.V., Uitenbroek, D.& Campostrini, S. (1992). Design, Implementation and Maintenance of a Continuous Population Survey by CATI, Bureau of Census, Annual Research Conference proceedings,.Google Scholar
  26. Miller, D. (1991). Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Murlow, C. D. (1994). Rationales for systematic review. British Medical Journal, 309, 597–599.Google Scholar
  28. Noack, H. (1988). Measuring health behaviour and health: towards new health promotion indicators. Health Promotion International, 3, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson, DE., Holtzman, D., Waller, M., Leutzinger, C.& Condon K. (1998). Objectives and design of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Dallas, TX: proceedings of the American Statistical Association Annual Conference, Section on Survey Methods, 214–218.Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, D. E., Holtzman, D., Bolen, J., Stanwyck, C.& Mack, K. (2001). Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Social and Preventive Medicine, 46, 1–42.Google Scholar
  31. Nutbeam, D. (1998). Evaluating health promotion progress, problems and solutions. Health Promotion International, 13–1, 27–44.Google Scholar
  32. Orwin, R.G. (1997). Twenty-one years old and counting: the Interrupted Time Series comes of age, in Chelimsky E., Shadish W.R. (eds.) Evaluation for the 21 st Century, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 443–466.Google Scholar
  33. Rütten, A., Luschen, G., von Lengerke, T., Abel, T., Kannas, L., Diaz, J. A. R., Vinck, J.& van der Zee, J. (2003.). Determinants of health policy impact: comparative results of a European policymaker study. Social and Preventive Medicine, 48(6), 379–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanderson, I. (2004). Getting evidence into practice. Perspective on rationality. Evaluation, 10(3), 366–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R.& Goodman, R. M. (1992). Towards integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Thurston, W. E., Vollmann, A.R., Wilson, D. R., MacKean G., Felix, R.& Wright M.F. (2003). Development and testing of a framework for assessing the effectiveness of health promotion. Social and Preventive Medicine, 48(5), 301–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Driel, W.G.& Keijsers, J. (1997). An instrument for reviewing the effectiveness of health education and health promotion. Patient Education and Counseling, 30, 7–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Victoria, C.G., Habicht, J.& Bryce j. (2004). Evidence-Based Public Health: Moving Beyond Randomized Trials. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Campostrini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations