Advertisement

Irritable Glue: The Haller–Whytt Controversy on the Mechanism of Muscle Contraction

  • Eugenio Frixione
Chapter

Animal motion has been one of the longest-lived great themes in neurophysiology. For the most part of that development the soul (anima), in any of its various versions – aerial, atomistic, or purely spiritual – was taken as the actual agent causing animation. Then, as it is well known, in the midseventeenth century this view was formally challenged by René Descartes (see Des Chene, 2001). The iatrophysical school he contributed to create maintained that the animal body is an automatic machine fully capable of executing and controlling all its operations, independently of any incorporeal assistance. Perhaps nowhere these two confronted positions – animist and mechanicist – clashed more loudly over a single specific topic than in the long dispute sustained, in the 1750s and early 1760s, between Albrecht von Haller and Robert Whytt about the persistence of irritability in isolated muscles.

The colorful Haller–Whytt debate, which was concerned also with the parallel physiological faculty of sensibility, has been thoroughly reviewed in stepwise detail (French, 1969; Miller, 1939). These excellent accounts of the subject, though, concentrate on the discussions about the relative irritability or sensibility of specific organs, the presence or absence of nerves in particular anatomical locations, or the spatial distribution of the soul in the animal body. Comparatively little attention has been focused on the radically opposed views of the two great authors regarding the basic mechanism of muscle contraction.

The present chapter examines this important aspect of the debate, starting from a brief background sketch of the theory of fibers as taught by Herman Boerhaave, under whom both Haller and Whytt studied. Then, following a summarized review of the main arguments on each side of the controversy, a few possible reasons are discussed of why and how was muscle the first province of the animal body to become permanently liberated from the sovereignty of the soul. A preliminary version of this paper has been published in abstract form (Frixione, 2004b).

Keywords

Muscle Contraction Animal Body General Physiology American Philosophical Society Animal Spirit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baglivi, G. (1702/1703). Specimen quatuor librorum de fibra motrice et morbosa. Roma/London: Buagni/Leigh and Midwinter.Google Scholar
  2. Bastholm, E. (1950). The history of muscle physiology. From the natural philosophers to Albrecht von Haller. København: Ejnar Munskgaard.Google Scholar
  3. Bichat, X. (1801). Anatomie Générale Appliquée à la Physiologie et à la Médecine. Paris: Brosson/Gabon.Google Scholar
  4. Birch, Th. (1756/1968). The history of the royal society of London for improving of natural knowledge from its first rise (Vol. II). London: A. Millar in the Strand. (Reprint edition, New York Johnson Reprint Corporation.).Google Scholar
  5. Boerhaave, H. (1737). Aphorismi de cognoscendis et curandis morbis in usum doctrinae domesticae digesti. Editio Leydensis quinta auctior. Lugduni Batavorum: Theodorum Haak, Samuelem Luchtmans, Joh. et Herm. Verbeek, et Rotterodami: Joh. Dan. Beman.Google Scholar
  6. Boerhaave, H. (1744) Dr. Boerhaave’s academical lectures on the theory of physic, being a genuine translation of his institutes and explanatory comment, collated and adjusted to each other, as they were dictated to his students at the University of Leyden (Institutiones medicae) (Vol. III). London: W. Innys.Google Scholar
  7. Descartes, R. (1664/1986). L’Homme. In Ch. Adam & P. Tannery (Eds.), Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. IX, pp. 119–202). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  8. Des Chene, D. (2001). Spirits and clocks: Machine and organism in Descartes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. French, R. K. (1969). Robert Whytt, the soul, and medicine. London: The Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine.Google Scholar
  10. Frixione, E. (2004a). Fibres (Théorie des). In D. Lecourt (Ed.) (Dir.), Dictionnaire de la Pensée Médicale (pp. 488–491). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  11. Frixione, E. (2004b). Irritable glue: The Haller–Whytt controversy over the mechanism of muscle contraction. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 13, 366.Google Scholar
  12. Frixione, E. (2006). Albrecht von Haller (1708–1777). Journal of Neurology, 253, 265–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galvani, L. (1791/1953). Commentary on the effect of electricity on muscular motion. Bononiæ. (De viribus electricitatis in motu musculari. Commentarius, M. G. Foley, Trans.; I. B. Cohen, Introd.; J. F. Fulton, M. E. Stanton, Bibliography). Norwalk: Conn. Burndy Library.Google Scholar
  14. Glisson, F. (1677). Tractatus de ventriculo et intestinis. London: Brome; see also Fulton, J. F., & Wilson, L. G. (1966). Selected readings in the history of physiology (pp. 218–219). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  15. Grmek, M. D. (1970). La notion de fibre vivante chez les médecins de l’école iatrophysique. Clio Medica, 5, 297–318.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, T. S. (1969). History of general physiology 600 B.C. to A.D. 1900 (Vol. I). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. von Haller, A. (1747/1786/1966). First lines of physiology (Primae lineae physiologiae) “Translated from the correct Latin edition. Printed under the inspection of William Cullen, and compared with the edition published by H. A. Wrisberg. Edinburgh”. (Reprint edition, with an introduction by Lester King. New York: Johnson Reprint CorporationGoogle Scholar
  18. von Haller, A. (1752). Relationes de novis libris, no.1, part 3 (cited by French, 1969, p. 9).Google Scholar
  19. von Haller, A. (1753/1755/1936). A dissertation on the sensible and irritable parts of animals (De Partibus Corporis Humani Sensibilibus et Irritabilibus, M. Tissot, Trans.) Republished with an introduction by Owsei Temkin. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  20. von Haller, A. (1760). Mémoires sur les Parties Sensibles et Irritables du Corps Animal (Tome IV). Lausanne: Sigismond D’Arnay.Google Scholar
  21. von Haller, A. (1762). Elementa physiologiæ corporis humani. Lausannæ: Francisci Grasset/Tomus Quartus/Liber Undecimus.Google Scholar
  22. von Haller, A. (1763). Ad Roberti Whyttii nuperum scriptum Apologia (In pamphlet, 1764; cited by Miller, 1939, pp. 101–102).Google Scholar
  23. Kant, I. (1787/1994). The critique of pure reason (Vol. 39) (Critik der reinen Vernunft, J. M. Meiklejohn, Trans., 2nd ed.). Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica/Great Books of the Western World.Google Scholar
  24. Kardel, T. (1994). Stensen’s myology in historical perspective. In Steno on muscles (Vol. 84, Part 1, pp. 1–57). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, Transactions.Google Scholar
  25. King, L. S. (1966). Introduction. In A. von Haller (1747/1786/1986), First lines of Physiology (Primae lineae physiologiae) “Translated from the correct Latin edition. Printed under the inspection of William Cullen, and compared with the edition published by H. A. Wrisberg. Edinburgh”. (Reprint edition, with an introduction by Lester King. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.) pp. ix–lxxii.Google Scholar
  26. de La Mettrie, J. O. (1747/2004). L’Homme machine. In J. P. Jackson (Ed.), La Mettrie–Œuvres Philosophiques. Vendôme: J. P. Jackson & Coda.Google Scholar
  27. Lavoisier, A. L. (1786/1965). Réflexions sur le phlogistique. In J. B. Dumas (Ed.), Oeuvres de Lavoisier publiées par les soins du Ministère de l’Instruction Publique et des Cultes (Tome II, pp. 623–655). Paris: Imprimerie Impériale. (Reprint edition (1862–1893). New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.).Google Scholar
  28. van Leeuwenhoek, A. (1682/1948). Letter to Robert Hooke, March 3rd. In Committee of Dutch Scientists (Ed.) The collected letters of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (Vol. III, pp. 385–415). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  29. Lower, R. (1669/1932). Treatise on the heart. London: Allestry. (De Corde, K. J. Franklin, Trans.) In Early science in Oxford (Vol. 9). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, G. (1939). Albrecht von Haller’s controversy with Robert Whytt. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University (MA Thesis, unpublished).Google Scholar
  31. Nayler, M. (2000). Introduction. In W. Croone (Ed.) (1664/2000), On the reason of the movement of the muscles (De ratione motus musculorum, P. G. Maquet, Trans.) (Vol. 90, Part 1, pp. 2–53). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, Transactions.Google Scholar
  32. Oken, L. (1805). Die Zeugung. Frankfurt bey Wesche.Google Scholar
  33. Pera, M. (1992). The ambiguous frog. The Galvani-Volta controversy on animal electricity (J. Mandelbaum, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Radbill, S. X. (1981). Whytt, Robert. In Ch. C. Gillispie (Ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography (Vol. 14, pp. 319–324). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  35. de Saussure, Raymond (1949). Haller and La Mettrie. Journal of the History of Medicine, 4, 431–449.Google Scholar
  36. Séguin, A., & Lavoisier, A. L. (1789). Premier mémoire sur la respiration des animaux. In J. B. Dumas (Ed.), Oeuvres de Lavoisier publiées par les soins du Ministère de l’Instruction Publique et des Cultes (Tome II, pp. 688–703). Paris: Imprimerie Impériale. (Reprint edition (1862–1893). New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.).Google Scholar
  37. Siegel, R. E. (1976). Galen on the affected parts. Translation from the Greek text with explanatory footnotes. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, C. U. M. (2002). Julien Offray de la Mettrie (1709–1751). Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 11, 110–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steno, N. (1667/1994). Elementorum myologiae specimen. Florence. In T. Kardel (Ed.), Steno on muscles (Vol. 84, part 1, pp. 76–228). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, Transactions.Google Scholar
  40. Swammerdam, J. (1737/1758/1978). The book of nature (Bybel der Natuur, Th. Flloyd, Trans., pp. 122–132). (Reprint edition, New York: Arno Press (Biologists of the World) II, pp. 122–132).Google Scholar
  41. van Swieten, G. (1744). The commentaries upon the aphorisms of Dr. Hermann Boerhaave, the late learned professor of physick in the University of Leyden, concerning the knowledge and cure of the several diseases incident to human bodies, translated into English (Vol. I). London: John and Paul Knapton.Google Scholar
  42. Temkin, O. (1964). The classical roots of Glisson’s doctrine of irritation. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 38, 297–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Verworn, M. (1913). Irritability: A physiological analysis of the general effect of stimuli in living substance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Whytt, R. (1751/1768). An essay on the vital and other involuntary motions of animals. Edinburgh: Hamilton, Balfour, and Neill. In The works of Robert Whytt, M. D., published by his son (pp. 1–208). Edinburgh: Beckett, Hondt, and Balfour.Google Scholar
  45. Whytt, R. (1755/1768). Observations on the sensibility and irritability of the parts of men and other animals, occasioned by the celebrated M. de Haller’s late treatise on those subjects. Edinburgh: Balfour. In The works of Robert Whytt, M. D., published by his son (pp. 255–306). Edinburgh: Beckett, Hondt and Balfour.Google Scholar
  46. Whytt, R. (1761). Appendix, containing a review of the controversy concerning the sensibility and moving power of the parts of men and other animals, in answer to M. de Haller’s late remarks on these subjects in the 4th volume of the Mémoires sur les parties sensibles et irritables. Physiological essays (2nd ed. pp. 219–314). Edinburgh: Hamilton, Balfour, and Neill.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, L. G. (1961). William Croone’s theory of muscular contraction. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 16, 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugenio Frixione
    • 1
  1. 1.Sección de Metodología y Teoría de la CienciaCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados IPNMéxico

Personalised recommendations